Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

ACC : Acute and Critical Care



Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "communication"
Article category
Publication year
Review Article
Theoretical definition of nurse–conscious mechanically ventilated patient communication: a scoping review with qualitative content analysis
Arezoo Mohamadkhani Ghiasvand, Meimanat Hosseini, Foroozan Atashzadeh-Shoorideh
Acute Crit Care. 2023;38(1):8-20.   Published online February 27, 2023
  • 884 View
  • 68 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Providing critical nursing care for conscious mechanically ventilated patients is mediated via effective communication. This study aimed to identify and map the antecedents, attributes, consequences, and definition of nurse–conscious mechanically ventilated patient communication (N-CMVPC). This scoping review was conducted by searching the Cochrane Library and the CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, between 2001 and 2021. The keywords queried included "nurses," "mechanically ventilated patients," "mechanical ventilation," "intubated patients," "communication," "interaction," "relationships," "nurse–patient communication," "nurse–patient relations," "intensive care units," and "critical care." Studies related to communication with healthcare personnel or family members were excluded. The results indicated that N-CMVPC manifests as a set of attributes in communication experiences, emotions, methods, and behaviors of the nurse and the patient and is classified into three main themes, nurse communication, patient communication, and quantitative-qualitative aspects. N-CMVPC is a complex, multidimensional, and multi-factor concept. It is often nurse-controlled and can express itself as questions, sentences, or commands in the context of experiences, feelings, and positive or negative behaviors involving the nurse and the patient.
Original Article
Implementing a Sepsis Resuscitation Bundle Improved Clinical Outcome: A Before-and-After Study
Jeongmin Kim, Sungwon Na, Young Chul Yoo, Shin Ok Koh
Korean J Crit Care Med. 2014;29(4):250-256.   Published online November 30, 2014
  • 4,613 View
  • 74 Download
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Unlike other diseases, the management of sepsis has not been fully integrated in our daily practice. The aim of this study was to determine whether repeated training could improve compliance with a 6-h resuscitation bundle in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.
Repeated education regarding a sepsis bundle was provided to the intensive care unit and emergency department residents, nurses, and faculties in a single university hospital. The educational program was led by a multidisciplinary team. A total of 175 adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock were identified (88 before and 87 after the educational program). Hemodynamic resuscitation bundle and timely antibiotics administration were measured for all cases and mortality at 28 days after sepsis diagnosis was evaluated.
The compliance rate for the sepsis resuscitation bundle before the educational program was poor (0%), and repeated training improved it to 80% (p < 0.001). The 28-day mortality was significantly lower in the intervention group (16% vs. 32%, p = 0.040). Within the intervention group, patients for whom the resuscitation bundle was successfully completed had a significantly lower 28-day mortality than other patients (11% vs. 41%, p = 0.004).
Repeated education led by a multidisciplinary team and interdisciplinary communication improved the compliance rate of the 6-h resuscitation bundle in severe sepsis and septic shock patients. Compliance with the sepsis resuscitation bundle was associated with improved 28-day mortality in the study population.


Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Hemodynamic monitoring with Hypotension Prediction Index versus arterial waveform analysis alone and incidence of perioperative hypotension
    Carla D. Grundmann, Jan M. Wischermann, Philipp Fassbender, Petra Bischoff, Ulrich H. Frey
    Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.2021; 65(10): 1404.     CrossRef
  • Barriers to Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation for Septic Patients in the Emergency Department
    Elizabeth N. Reich, Karen L. Then, James A. Rankin
    Journal of Emergency Nursing.2018; 44(6): 552.     CrossRef

ACC : Acute and Critical Care