Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

ACC : Acute and Critical Care

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Acute Crit Care > Volume 38(4); 2023 > Article
Corrigendum
Meta-analysis
Comparison of safety and efficacy between therapeutic or intermediate versus prophylactic anticoagulation for thrombosis in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hyeon-Jeong Lee1,*, Hye Jin Jang2,*, Won-Il Choi2, Joonsung Joh3, Junghyun Kim3, Jungeun Park1, Miyoung Choi1
Acute and Critical Care 2023;38(4):516-516.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2022.01424.e1
Published online: November 20, 2023

1Division of Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea

2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University, Goyang, Korea

3Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea

Corresponding author: Miyoung Choi Division of Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Health and Welfare Administration Town, 400 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 04933, Korea Tel: +82-2-2174-2867, Fax: +82-2-747-4916, Email: myhams95@gmail.com
*These authors contributed equally to this work.
• Received: November 28, 2023   • Accepted: November 20, 2023

Copyright © 2023 The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 1,169 Views
  • 44 Download
prev
This corrects the article "Comparison of safety and efficacy between therapeutic or intermediate versus prophylactic anticoagulation for thrombosis in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis" on page 160.
Acute and Critical Care 2023;38:160-71
https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2022.01424
In the article entitled “Comparison of safety and efficacy between therapeutic or intermediate versus prophylactic anticoagulation for thrombosis in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” there was an error in Results section of the abstract. In the sentence “In the severe patients, the incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events in the therapeutic or intermediate.” should be:
“In the severe group, the incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events in the therapeutic and prophylaxis groups was not statistically different.”
Furthermore, the city of Myongji Hospital was inadvertently omitted, and it should be included as “Goyang.”

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • PubReader PubReader
      • ePub LinkePub Link
      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Comparison of safety and efficacy between therapeutic or intermediate versus prophylactic anticoagulation for thrombosis in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
        Acute Crit Care. 2023;38(4):516-516.   Published online November 28, 2023
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Related articles
      Comparison of safety and efficacy between therapeutic or intermediate versus prophylactic anticoagulation for thrombosis in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
      Comparison of safety and efficacy between therapeutic or intermediate versus prophylactic anticoagulation for thrombosis in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      ACC : Acute and Critical Care
      TOP