Acute and Critical Care

Original Articles

Nursing
The Glasgow Coma Scale and Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score evaluation to predict patient outcomes with neurological illnesses in intensive care units in West Bank: a prospective cross-sectional study: Wourod Mahmoud Omar, Imad Rasheed Abu Khader, Salam Bani Hani, Mohammed ALBashtawy; Acute Crit Care. 2024;39(3):408-419. Published online August 30, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2024.00570

5,356 View
270 Download
1 Crossref

Background
Determining the clinical neurological state of the patient is essential for making decisions and forecasting results. The Glasgow Coma Scale and the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) Scale are commonly used tools for measuring behavioral consciousness. This study aims to compare scales among patients with neurological disorders in intensive care units (ICUs) in the West Bank.
Methods
A prospective cross-sectional design was employed. All patients admitted to ICUs who met inclusion criteria were involved in this study. Data were collected from from An-Najah National University, Al-Watani, and Rafedia Hospital. Both tools were used to collect data.
Results
A total of 84 patients were assessed, 69.0% of the patients were male, and the average length of stay was 6.4 days. The mean score on the Glasgow Coma scale was 11.2 on admission 11.6 after 48 hours, and 12.2 on discharge. The mean FOUR Scale score was 12.2 on admission, 12.4 after 48 hours, and 12.5 at discharge.
Conclusions
This study indicates that both the Glasgow Coma Scale and the FOUR scale are effective in predicting outcomes for neurologically deteriorated critically ill patients. However, the FOUR scale proved to be more reliable when assessing outcomes in ICU patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The impact of The Quality and Safety Education (QSEN) program on the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of junior nurses
Salam AlRatrout, Imad Abu Khader, Mohammed ALBashtawy, Mohammed Asia, Abdullah Alkhawaldeh, Salam Bani Hani, Majed Sulaiman Alamri
PLOS ONE.2025; 20(1): e0317448. CrossRef

Trauma
Comparison of admission GCS score to admission GCS-P and FOUR scores for prediction of outcomes among patients with traumatic brain injury in the intensive care unit in India: Nishant Agrawal, Shivakumar S Iyer, Vishwanath Patil, Sampada Kulkarni, Jignesh N Shah, Prashant Jedge; Acute Crit Care. 2023;38(2):226-233. Published online May 25, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2023.00570

6,218 View
260 Download
7 Web of Science
5 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Background
This study aimed to determine the predictive power of the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) score and the Glasgow Coma Scale Pupil (GCS-P) score in determining outcomes for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was used to evaluate patients at 1 month and 6 months after the injury.
Methods
We conducted a 15-month prospective observational study. It included 50 TBI patients admitted to the ICU who met our inclusion criteria. We used Pearson’s correlation coefficient to relate coma scales and outcome measures. The predictive value of these scales was determined using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calculating the area under the curve with a 99% confidence interval. All hypotheses were two-tailed, and significance was defined as P<0.01.
Results
In the present study, the GCS-P and FOUR scores among all patients on admission as well as in the subset of patients who were mechanically ventilated were statistically significant and strongly correlated with patient outcomes. The correlation coefficient of the GCS score compared to GCS-P and FOUR scores was higher and statistically significant. The areas under the ROC curve for the GCS, GCS-P, and FOUR scores and the number of computed tomography abnormalities were 0.912, 0.905, 0.937, and 0.324, respectively.
Conclusions
The GCS, GCS-P, and FOUR scores are all excellent predictors with a strong positive linear correlation with final outcome prediction. In particular, the GCS score has the best correlation with final outcome.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Development of a Novel Neurological Score Combining GCS and FOUR Scales for Assessment of Neurosurgical Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: GCS-FOUR Scale
Ali Ansari, Sina Zoghi, Amirabbas Khoshbooei, Mohammad Amin Mosayebi, Maryam Feili, Omid Yousefi, Amin Niakan, Seyed Amin Kouhpayeh, Reza Taheri, Hosseinali Khalili
World Neurosurgery.2024; 182: e866. CrossRef
Comparison of Glasgow Coma Scale Full Outline of UnResponsiveness and Glasgow Coma Scale: Pupils Score for Predicting Outcome in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury
Indu Kapoor, Hemanshu Prabhakar, Arvind Chaturvedi, Charu Mahajan, Abraham L Chawnchhim, Tej P Sinha
Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine.2024; 28(3): 256. CrossRef
Machine learning for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in intensive care unit
Baojie Mao, Lichao Ling, Yuhang Pan, Rui Zhang, Wanning Zheng, Yanfei Shen, Wei Lu, Yuning Lu, Shanhu Xu, Jiong Wu, Ming Wang, Shu Wan
Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The assessment of consciousness status in primary brainstem hemorrhage (PBH) patients can be achieved by monitoring changes in basic vital signs
Shiyi Zuo, Yuting Feng, Juan Sun, Guofang Liu, Hanxu Cai, Xiaolong Zhang, Zhian Hu, Yong Liu, Zhongxiang Yao
Geriatric Nursing.2024; 59: 498. CrossRef
Traumatic brain injury in companion animals: Pathophysiology and treatment
Molly Wart, Thomas H. Edwards, Julie A. Rizzo, Geoffrey W. Peitz, Armi Pigott, Jonathan M. Levine, Nicholas D. Jeffery
Topics in Companion Animal Medicine.2024; 63: 100927. CrossRef

Trauma
Association of Glasgow coma scale and endotracheal intubation in predicting mortality among patients admitted to the intensive care unit: Nader Markazi Moghaddam, Mohammad Fathi, Sanaz Zargar Balaye Jame, Mohammad Darvishi, Morteza Mortazavi; Acute Crit Care. 2023;38(1):113-121. Published online February 22, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2022.00927

5,601 View
181 Download
1 Web of Science
2 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Background
We assessed predictors of mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) and investigated if Glasgow coma scale (GCS) is associated with mortality in patients undergoing endotracheal intubation (EI).
Methods
From February 2020, we performed a 1-year study on 2,055 adult patients admitted to the ICU of two teaching hospitals. The outcome was mortality during ICU stay and the predictors were patients’ demographic, clinical, and laboratory features.
Results
EI was associated with a decreased risk for mortality compared with similar patients (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.32; P=0.030). This shows that EI had been performed correctly with proper indications. Increasing age (AOR, 1.04; P<0.001) or blood pressure (AOR, 1.01; P<0.001), respiratory problems (AOR, 3.24; P<0.001), nosocomial infection (AOR, 1.64; P=0.014), diabetes (AOR, 5.69; P<0.001), history of myocardial infarction (AOR, 2.52; P<0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AOR, 3.93; P<0.001), immunosuppression (AOR, 3.15; P<0.001), and the use of anesthetics/sedatives/hypnotics for reasons other than EI (AOR, 4.60; P<0.001) were directly; and GCS (AOR, 0.84; P<0.001) was inversely related to mortality. In patients with trauma surgeries (AOR, 0.62; P=0.014) or other surgical categories (AOR, 0.61; P=0.024) undergoing EI, GCS had an inverse relation with mortality (accuracy=82.6%, area under the receiver operator characteristic curve=0.81).
Conclusions
A variety of features affected the risk for mortality in patients admitted to the ICU. Considering GCS score for EI had the potential of affecting prognosis in subgroups of patients such as those with trauma surgeries or other surgical categories.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Airway management and functional outcomes in intubated patients with ischemic stroke
Jae Wook Jung, Ilmo Kang, Jin Park, Sang-Beom Jeon
Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The Glasgow Coma Scale: an international standard for education and practice with adults
Neal Cook, Ruth Trout, Catheryne Waterhouse, Mary Braine, Chris Barrett, Paul Brennan, Graham Teasdale, Ole Abildgaard Hansen, Valeria Caponnetto, Pedro Raúl Castellano Santana, Hilalnur Küçükakgün, Claire Lynch, Andrea Shepherd, Zeliha Tulek, Zoé Wahl
British Journal of Neuroscience Nursing.2025; 21(Sup1c): S1. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search