Transforming rapid response team through artificial intelligence

Article information

Acute Crit Care. 2025;40(1):136-137
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 February 19
doi : https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.000425
1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
2Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
3Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
Address for correspondence: Kwangha Lee Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, 179 Gudeok-ro, Seo-gu, Busan 49241, Korea Tel: +82-51-240-7743 Fax: +82-52-245-3127 Email: jubilate@pusan.ac.kr
Received 2025 February 4; Accepted 2025 February 5.

The rapid response team (RRT) plays a crucial role in reducing the incidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation among hospitalized patients in general wards. RRTs contribute to the prevention of cardiopulmonary arrest and help lower overall and unexpected hospital mortality rates. However, to make a tangible impact, RRTs must be effectively and frequently utilized. Despite clear activation criteria, many clinicians hesitate to call RRTs, delaying or entirely omitting activation even when patients meet the necessary conditions. Such delays or failures to respond in time significantly increase patient morbidity and mortality [1].

In this issue of Acute and Critical Care, Lim et al. [2] examined the perspectives of nurses and residents regarding RRTs in a 1,400-bed tertiary hospital in South Korea. Their findings suggest that while the majority acknowledge the importance of RRTs in preventing patient deterioration, several barriers hinder their optimal use. One of the main challenges is a lack of awareness and confidence in activation protocols, with only 22% of respondents reporting familiarity with RRT criteria. Additionally, cultural dynamics—such as strong hierarchical structures—caused 85.7% of respondents to seek approval from senior physicians before initiating RRT activation. The reluctance to activate RRTs due to fear of criticism for unnecessary alerts further exacerbates the issue. The authors emphasize that addressing these barriers through targeted educational initiatives, modifications in institutional culture, and structural enhancements is crucial to improving RRT efficiency and ensuring better patient outcomes.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning offer promising avenues to address these challenges. These advanced technologies enable more precise early warning systems, surpassing traditional detection methods for patient deterioration. AI-powered systems can eliminate human hesitations and inefficiencies by autonomously recognizing warning signs and triggering RRT activation, leading to improved patient care. Various AI-driven solutions have been designed to facilitate timely RRT activation and reduce delays. One such innovation is the Deep Learning–Based Cardiac Arrest Risk Management System (DeepCARS), which has demonstrated superior accuracy in predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest and unplanned intensive care unit admissions compared to conventional early warning score systems. DeepCARS integrates vast amounts of electronic health record data to provide real-time alerts, enabling proactive clinical interventions and improving patient survival rates [3]. Moreover, a recent study demonstrated the effectiveness of another AI-based deterioration detection model, which significantly reduced the likelihood of care escalation events—including RRT activations, intensive care unit transfers, and cardiopulmonary arrests. This provides strong evidence supporting the role of AI-driven innovations in enhancing RRT effectiveness and optimizing patient management [4].

The integration of AI and machine learning into RRT frameworks holds transformative potential for patient care by resolving long-standing barriers to RRT activation. By refining early warning systems, enhancing predictive accuracy, and enabling swift interventions, these technologies can substantially reduce the risks associated with delayed or missed RRT activations. Furthermore, the widespread adoption of AI-powered critical care platforms reflects a global trend toward leveraging digital innovations to promote equitable healthcare access and improve outcomes. Moving forward, continued investment in clinician education, cultural shifts, and technological advancements will be essential to ensuring that RRTs function optimally, safeguarding patient well-being, and elevating the standard of hospital care.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Kwangha Lee is an editorial board member of the journal but was not involved in the peer reviewer selection, evaluation, or decision process of this article. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

FUNDING

None.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

None.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

All the work was done by KL.

References

1. Winters BD. Rapid response systems. Crit Care Clin 2024;40:583–98. 10.1016/j.ccc.2024.03.008. 38796229.
2. Lim SY, Woo HG, Park JS, Cho YJ, Lee JH, Lee YJ. Resident and nurse attitudes toward a rapid response team in a tertiary hospital in South Korea. Acute and Crit Care 2025;40:18–36.
3. Cho KJ, Kim JS, Lee DH, Lee SM, Song MJ, Lim SY, et al. Prospective, multicenter validation of the deep learning-based cardiac arrest risk management system for predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest or unplanned intensive care unit transfer in patients admitted to general wards. Crit Care 2023;27:346. 10.1186/s13054-023-04609-0. 37670324.
4. Gallo RJ, Shieh L, Smith M, Marafino BJ, Geldsetzer P, Asch SM, et al. Effectiveness of an artificial intelligence-enabled intervention for detecting clinical deterioration. JAMA Intern Med 2024;184:557–62. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0084. 38526472.

Article information Continued