Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

ACC : Acute and Critical Care

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search
Advanced Search
mobile menu button

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Acute Crit Care > Volume 39(4); 2024 > Article
Editorial
Surgery The efficacy of intensivist-led closed-system intensive care units in improving outcomes for cancer patients requiring emergent surgical intervention
Eun Young Kimorcid
Acute and Critical Care 2024;39(4):640-642.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2024.01256
Published online: November 28, 2024

Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea

Corresponding Author: Eun Young Kim Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea Tel: +82-2258-2876 Fax: +82-2077-1533 E-mail: freesshs@naver.com
• Received: November 8, 2024   • Revised: November 20, 2024   • Accepted: November 20, 2024

© 2024 The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 239 Views
  • 17 Download
prev next
Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF

With the accelerated aging of the population and advancements in medical devices and therapies, there has been a rise in the number of high-risk patients and complex surgical procedures. This trend has underscored the importance of perioperative management and intensive care for severe postoperative complications, reflecting a growing societal demand for these services. Intensive care for critically ill patients necessitates a specialized approach that differs from that for general patients, involving complex pathophysiological considerations and the use of highly specialized, advanced, and costly equipment and interventions [1]. Therefore, numerous studies have explored how the organizational efficiency and operational frameworks of intensive care units (ICUs) affect clinical outcomes [2-4]. Specifically, analyses comparing open ICUs, where primary physicians manage patient care, to closed ICUs, where dedicated intensivists handle all ICU-related care and decision-making, have indicated that closed ICUs are associated with better clinical outcomes, particularly in units treating critically ill patients with high severity of illness. In the closed ICU model, the intensivist—a physician specialized in critical care—takes on comprehensive responsibility for the treatment planning, execution, and operational management of all ICU-admitted patients. The role of the intensivist is therefore central to the effectiveness of the closed ICU system [5-8].
The care of surgical patients requiring ICU admission, particularly those involved in perioperative and postoperative management, necessitates not only a medical approach to underlying conditions but also a deep understanding of the physiological changes and anatomical complexities introduced by surgery. Among these patients, those undergoing emergency surgery for malignancies account for over 60% of all ICU admissions among cancer patients. These individuals often have poor prognoses due to a combination of nutritional deficits, cachexia, general debilitation, organ dysfunction, and the immunosuppressive effects of cancer treatments, which predispose them to severe infectious complications [9]. Specifically, intra-abdominal complications following surgery can have a mortality rate as high as 20% [10,11]. This highlights the critical importance of specialized medical teams and efficient ICU organizational frameworks in managing the complex pathophysiological changes in these patients.
This study compared clinical outcomes between open and closed ICU systems for critically ill patients undergoing emergency surgery due to acute abdominal complications [12]. It was found that patients in closed ICUs experienced shorter times from diagnosis to ICU admission, surgery, and antibiotic administration compared to those in open ICUs. Additionally, the closed ICU model was identified as an independent factor associated with reduced in-hospital mortality for patients requiring emergency surgery. In closed ICUs, intensivists take full responsibility for patient care from the time of ICU admission. This allows for the implementation of systematic and standardized treatment protocols, as well as the timely administration of specialized therapies such as mechanical ventilation and continuous renal replacement therapy. Although the reductions in time achieved in these processes did not independently correlate with lower in-hospital mortality in this study, the structured ICU model aims to improve clinical outcomes by facilitating earlier intensive treatments and timely interventions with antibiotics and other therapies to support organ function.
However, as the authors note, this retrospective study was limited by its reliance on medical records, which restricted the evaluation of patients' initial clinical conditions and precluded analysis of long-term outcomes. Additionally, the simultaneous implementation of both open and closed ICU models, without standardized criteria for assigning patients, introduces the possibility of selection bias. Most studies that compare open and closed ICU models use retrospective designs, inherently limiting the randomization of patient profiles between the two systems. Furthermore, the relatively low Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores and lactate levels at ICU admission, juxtaposed with high in-hospital mortality rates, suggest limitations in applying these findings to critically ill cancer patients undergoing emergency surgery, who typically exhibit higher severity levels.
Although most ICU model comparison studies to date have concentrated on general ICU populations rather than on surgical oncology patients requiring emergency procedures, the findings of this study are nonetheless valuable. They indicate that a closed ICU system managed by intensivists can enhance outcomes for critically ill cancer patients who require emergency surgery by facilitating timely and specialized interventions. In light of the increasing number of cancer patients needing emergency surgical and ICU care annually, and in light of recent Korean policies that favor the adoption of intensivist-led ICU models to optimize resource use and improve patient outcomes, future research should prioritize prospective comparisons between open and closed ICU systems. These studies should incorporate standardized admission criteria and extend the analysis to longer-term outcomes to draw more definitive conclusions.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Eun Young Kim is an editorial board member of the journal but was not involved in the peer reviewer selection, evaluation, or decision process of this article. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

FUNDING

None.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

None.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

All the work was done by EYK.

  • 1. Gajic O, Afessa B, Hanson AC, Krpata T, Yilmaz M, Mohamed SF, et al. Effect of 24-hour mandatory versus on-demand critical care specialist presence on quality of care and family and provider satisfaction in the intensive care unit of a teaching hospital. Crit Care Med 2008;36:36-44.
  • 2. Penoyer DA. Nurse staffing and patient outcomes in critical care: a concise review. Crit Care Med 2010;38:1521-8.ArticlePubMed
  • 3. Banerjee R, Naessens JM, Seferian EG, Gajic O, Moriarty JP, Johnson MG, et al. Economic implications of nighttime attending intensivist coverage in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2011;39:1257-62.ArticlePubMed
  • 4. van der Sluis FJ, Slagt C, Liebman B, Beute J, Mulder JW, Engel AF. The impact of open versus closed format ICU admission practices on the outcome of high risk surgical patients: a cohort analysis. BMC Surg 2011;11:18. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 5. Nawaz FA, Deo N, Surani S, Maynard W, Gibbs ML, Kashyap R. Critical care practices in the world: results of the global intensive care unit need assessment survey 2020. World J Crit Care Med 2022;11:169-77.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 6. Sakr Y, Moreira CL, Rhodes A, Ferguson ND, Kleinpell R, Pickkers P, et al. The impact of hospital and ICU organizational factors on outcome in critically ill patients: results from the Extended Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care study. Crit Care Med 2015;43:519-26.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 7. Yang Q, Du JL, Shao F. Mortality rate and other clinical features observed in Open vs closed format intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e16261. ArticlePubMed
  • 8. Hackner D, Shufelt CL, Balfe DD, Lewis MI, Elsayegh A, Braunstein GD, et al. Do faculty intensivists have better outcomes when caring for patients directly in a closed ICU versus consulting in an open ICU? Hosp Pract (1995) 2009;37:40-50.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 9. Soares M, Caruso P, Silva E, Teles JM, Lobo SM, Friedman G, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer requiring admission to intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study. Crit Care Med 2010;38:9-15.ArticlePubMed
  • 10. Yaroustovsky M, Abramyan M, Krotenko N, Popov D, Plyushch M, Rogalskaya E. A pilot study of selective lipopolysaccharide adsorption and coupled plasma filtration and adsorption in adult patients with severe sepsis. Blood Purif 2015;39:210-7.ArticlePubMed
  • 11. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med 2001;29:1303-10.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 12. Lee JH, Kim JH, You KH, Han WH. Effects of closed- versus open-system intensive care units on mortality rates in patients with cancer requiring emergent surgical intervention for acute abdominal complications: a single-center retrospective study in Korea. Acute Crit Care 2024;39:554-64.Article

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • PubReader PubReader
      • ePub LinkePub Link
      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.
        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        The efficacy of intensivist-led closed-system intensive care units in improving outcomes for cancer patients requiring emergent surgical intervention
        Acute Crit Care. 2024;39(4):640-642.   Published online November 28, 2024
        DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2024.01256
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Related articles
      The efficacy of intensivist-led closed-system intensive care units in improving outcomes for cancer patients requiring emergent surgical intervention
      The efficacy of intensivist-led closed-system intensive care units in improving outcomes for cancer patients requiring emergent surgical intervention
      ACC : Acute and Critical Care
      © The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine.
      TOP