Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

ACC : Acute and Critical Care

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Acute Crit Care > Volume 38(4); 2023 > Article
Review Article
Surgery
Early detection and assessment of intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a comprehensive review
Hanan Elkalawy1orcid, Pavan Sekhar1orcid, Wael Abosena2orcid
Acute and Critical Care 2023;38(4):409-424.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2023.00703
Published online: November 30, 2023
  • 1,589 Views
  • 172 Download

1Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA

2Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Gharbeya, Egypt

Corresponding author: Hanan Elkalawy Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, Boston, MA 02111, USA Tel: +1-832-375-0853, Fax: +1-617-636-8384, Email: hananelsaied33@gmail.com
• Received: May 14, 2023   • Revised: October 4, 2023   • Accepted: October 17, 2023

Copyright © 2023 The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • Intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) is a serious complication in critically ill patients. Therefore, timely and accurate diagnosis and monitoring of ICU-AW are crucial for effectively preventing its associated morbidity and mortality. This article provides a comprehensive review of ICU-AW, focusing on the different methods used for its diagnosis and monitoring. Additionally, it highlights the role of bedside ultrasound in muscle assessment and early detection of ICU-AW. Furthermore, the article explores potential strategies for preventing ICU-AW. Healthcare providers who manage critically ill patients utilize diagnostic approaches such as physical exams, imaging, and assessment tools to identify ICU-AW. However, each method has its own limitations. The diagnosis of ICU-AW needs improvement due to the lack of a consensus on the appropriate approach for its detection. Nevertheless, bedside ultrasound has proven to be the most reliable and cost-effective tool for muscle assessment in the ICU. Combining the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score assessment, and ultrasound can be a convenient approach for the early detection of ICU-AW. This approach can facilitate timely intervention and prevent catastrophic consequences. However, further studies are needed to strengthen the evidence.
Skeletal muscle dysfunction is a common issue in intensive care units (ICUs), which can result from ICU admission or be the underlying cause. Muscle weakness and loss of function are common manifestations of this condition [1]. The history of this condition dates to Hippocrates, who described “spontaneous lassitude" and muscle atrophy in patients dying from infection and cancer [2]. Osler also observed weakness in critical illness early [3]. In 1977, a status asthmaticus patient who received greater doses of hydrocortisone and concurrent neuromuscular inhibition was reported to have developed myopathy [4]. Since then, Bolton and his colleagues have conducted significant research on ICU patients with polyneuropathy [5]. In the past 20 years, advances in post-ICU survival have led to a deeper understanding of frailty acquired in the ICU. Healthcare professionals, patients, and families are all aware of the severity of neuromuscular damage in the growing number of patients receiving post-ICU rehabilitation [6]. ICU-Acquired Weakness (ICU-AW) is defined as the weakness and inability to move against resistance in critically ill patients, manifesting as widespread and symmetrical weakness affecting both the extremities and the respiratory muscles following the onset of a severe medical condition, with no discernible underlying cause other than the critical illness itself along with Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score of less than 48/60 or Dominant-hand grip dynamometry scores of less than 11 kg (interquartile range [IQR], 10–40 kg) in males and less than 7 kg (IQR, 0–7.3 kg) in females [2,7]. Healthcare professionals need to know when to suspect ICU-AW, what risk factors to identify, how to diagnose it, what the prognosis is, and how to improve recovery to lower the prevalence of the disorder. [6].
To ensure a thorough and reliable literature review, various steps were taken. Initially, an extensive search was conducted on peer-reviewed journals using a diverse set of keywords such as "bioimpedance," "computed tomography," "dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry," "intensive care unit-acquired weakness," "muscle assessment," and "ultrasound." The search was limited to peer-reviewed journals and excluded conference papers or reports. Two databases, namely PubMed and Google Scholar were used for the search. Additionally, the reference section of each identified article was examined to find more relevant articles. The search included articles published between 2000 and 2022.
ICUs globally care for 13-20 million patients annually [8], with ICU-AW occurring in 25%–31% of medical and 57%–74% of surgical ICUs [9]. The Incidence varies by patient characteristics [10], and can develop rapidly, even within hours of admission or mechanical ventilation [11-13], ICU-AW can persist for years, especially in patients ventilated for over 4–7 days, and is common in elderly patients (up to 70%) [1,14].
ICU-AW can impact the entire neuromuscular system, causing critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP) in the peripheral nerves, critical illness myopathy (CIM) in the muscle, or critical illness neuromyopathy (CINMB), which is a combination of both. These conditions can result in symmetrical weakness and atrophy of the muscles, with CIP primarily affecting lower limbs. In contrast, CIM acts the proximal areas and can lead to respiratory muscle weakness, and descriptions of CINMB have been observed to be transient with flaccid areflexic weakness affecting all four limbs, facial and ocular muscles without sensory impairment, occurring 2 to 10 days after discontinuing non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents [6,7,15]. However, muscle weakness, called ICU-AW, more frequently appears as a secondary problem while patients receive treatment for more serious illnesses. ICU-AW is clinically detectable in critically ill patients without a plausible explanation. These conditions could significantly impact long-term patient outcomes if not addressed [6].
There are many risk factors (Figure 1), including that ICU-AW is strongly linked with continuous APACHE II scores ≥15. Additionally, corticosteroids, aminoglycosides, and neuromuscular blocking agents have been demonstrated to be significantly associated with ICU-AW [16]. Although there is no significant association between Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and ICU-AW, the SOFA score is >7, the first-week total SOFA score is >45, the duration of dysfunction in two organs, and neurologic failure appeared to be independent risk variables for ICU-AW in every single research [17]. Individuals with sepsis were more vulnerable to muscle weakness caused by sepsis-induced myopathy or axonal neuropathy [18]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines have been identified to control muscle mass, so it is important to control sepsis early [19]. It was concluded that no significant association existed between days of norepinephrine administration and ICU-AW [20]. But treatment with norepinephrine was found to be a substantial risk for developing ICU-AW in the single study on multivariable analysis [21]. Several other risk factors were presented, including the female sex, as women were more vulnerable than men, possibly because of their less muscle mass. In every study, hyperosmolarity, hyperglycemia, high lactate, and duration of mechanical ventilation and parenteral nutrition were associated with an increased risk of developing ICU-AW [16].
ICU-AW pathogenesis still needs to be better understood. Two main factors contribute to this condition: decreased muscle mass and reduced muscle function. In critical illness, muscle mass loss occurs due to a reduction in protein production and an increase in protein degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. This catabolic state is characterized by decreased anabolic hormone effect, increased catabolic hormones, and immobilization, all contributing to muscle wasting [17]. Structural muscle changes, such as inflammation or necrosis, substantial infiltration of muscle with adipose tissue, and fibrosis, are commonly observed in severely ill individuals [22]. Microcirculatory disturbances can also jeopardize oxygen supply and perfusion, leading to chronic membrane depolarization of terminal motor axons, neuronal damage, and axonal degeneration [23,24].
Bioenergetic failure caused by cellular damage worsened by inflammation, hyperglycemia, and free radical damage can compromise mitochondrial energy synthesis. Dysfunctional mitochondria generate reactive oxygen species and free radicals, leading to a macromolecular and organelle damage cycle [24]. Impaired autophagy activation during acute disease allows damage to accumulate to mitochondria and other cellular components, leading to degenerative alterations that impair muscle function [22,24-26]. The inactivation of sodium channels in neuronal and muscle cell membranes leads to reversible hypo- or inexcitability. Altered excitation-contraction coupling and intracellular calcium homeostasis contribute to reduced muscle contractility [24].
Recent research suggests that failure of coordinated repeated firing within motor neurons may occur early, involving the central nervous system. This failure may occur before the electrical breakdown of axons and nerve-muscle coupling [27]. Muscle inactivity during ICU stays leads to a rapid decline in protein synthesis and proteolysis in respiratory and limb muscles, indicating early disturbances in proteostasis (Figure 1). These effects are independent of muscle function or type, emphasizing the need for therapeutic interventions to prevent skeletal muscle wasting in critical care patients. Studies show that anabolic signaling and protein synthesis decrease rapidly while key proteolytic systems activate during ICU care [28].
ICU-AW can cause a variety of short- and long-term negative effects (Figure 1).
Short‐Term Consequences
A higher risk of ICU death has been independently linked to the onset and severity of ICU-AW, which has been linked to limb muscle loss. Although not conclusive, it has also been seen in diaphragm malfunction [29]. Additionally, it has been discovered that respiratory muscle and limb weakness are separate predictors of a protracted need for artificial ventilation [30]. Elevated extubation failure rates in medical patients were independently correlated with limb muscular weakness [31]. Reintubation was required in 50% of them after extubation failed; of them, 50% died in the ICU. Additionally, muscle weakness is linked to longer ICU and hospital stays and costs [29]. Furthermore, neuromuscular weakening has been cited as a major factor causing ICU-acquired swallowing difficulties, such as post-extubation dysphagia [32]. Effective coughing may be hampered by abdominal muscular weakness [15]. More patients were sent to rehabilitation facilities, and worse short-term results were linked to ICU-acquired frailty.
Long‐Term Consequences
The survivors of critical illnesses have a higher chance of dying later in life [26,33], which is exacerbated in patients suffering from ICU-acquired frailty. A lower compound muscle action potential on ICU day 8, regardless of clinical weakness identified by the MRC total score [34], and respiratory muscle weakness demonstrated by a low maximal inspiratory pressure field [35] was also independently associated with greater 1-year mortality. A 5-year survival rate is also linked to a low (MRC sum score of 48) at hospital discharge [36]. Five years following ICU admission, a diverse sample of patients with critical illness demonstrated decreased physical quality of life, significantly shortened 6-minute walking distance (6-MWD), and lower handgrip force [33]. A significant independent predictor for long-term weakness, various illnesses, and poor quality of life after ICU discharge appeared to be the development of weakness [37]. A myogenic origin of ICU-AW seemed to have a more favorable outcome in nearly full recovery than a neurogenic origin, which left 50 to 75% of patients with persisting weakness or even tetraparesis [29,38].
The consensus across various studies is that early identification of ICU-AW is important in its prevention. However, there is no precise designated day for such assessments. Based on consensus, patients who remain in the ICU beyond the 8th day from admission, referred to as "long-stay patients," undergo a systematic evaluation to assess awakening and cooperation. So, it is preferred that as soon as admission to ICU, we start with SOFA and APACHE screening accompanied by an ultrasound assessment in the first week is the most beneficial approach [11,39]. Early detection, diagnosis, and successful prevention are crucial measures to reduce ICU-AW incidence, given the absence of an effective treatment for this condition. The importance of timely identification and management of ICU-AW must be considered [40]. A cross-sectional survey study conducted in 2021 focused on assessing ICU-AW in some low-income countries; insufficient diagnosis and early identification of ICU-AW are common due to staff-related, patient-related, and management-related factors. Staff obstacles include limited understanding, lack of guidelines for high-risk patients, and low priority for ICU-AW. Patient-related barriers involve cognitive decline, inability to participate, unconsciousness, and excessive sedation. Management-related challenges are perceived as low priority and inadequate staffing for ICU-AW assessment. However, achieving a clinical diagnosis, performing appropriate testing, and maintaining clear communication with patients and ICU colleagues is crucial [14]. This study also found that the MRC scores (79%), Manual Muscle Tests scale (73%), and electrophysiological assessments (70%) were the top three preferred tools for assessing ICU-AW [14]. The most used voluntary methodology for evaluating ICU-AW is the 6-grade MRC sum score [2,15,41,42]. A score below 48 on the 6-grade MRC sum score indicates clinically evident muscle weakness. In contrast, a score below 36 suggests severe muscle weakness. However, it can be challenging to differentiate between higher scores [43]. Compared to the conventional 6-grade assessment, a modified 4-grade score demonstrated improved reliability in identifying ICU-AW. However, this approach still needs to undergo validation [44]. Hand-held dynamometry is commonly utilized to assess handgrip and quadriceps strength. However, concerns have been raised regarding its ability to provide a continuous quantitative measure [15,42,45]. Less commonly employed tools for assessing ICU-AW include the Scored Physical Function in Intensive Care Test, Functional Status Score for the ICU, and Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool. However, their use is less widespread [46]. The 6-MWD test is another assessment tool that measures patients' functional capacity and is utilized to evaluate their motor function [47]. Electrophysiological assessments are possible even when patients are unconscious and can distinguish between CIP and CIM. However, this approach is time-consuming, and expertise in this area may be limited.
Additionally, the significant co-occurrence of CIP and CIM can further complicate the differential diagnosis [41,48]. Direct muscle stimulation helps distinguish between CIP and CIM. Imaging techniques can measure muscle mass and quality, but the 4-compartment model is not practical in clinical settings. Clinicians must rely on accessible methods for assessing muscle mass and quality [49]. Numerous methods have been developed for identifying ICU-AW. However, in practical terms, the diagnosis relies primarily on clinical tests and electrophysiological studies after excluding underlying causes of neuromuscular disorders [29].
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) are all methods to measure and quantify muscle size and quality [50]. MRIs and CTs are gold standards for evaluating muscle quality and quantity [50]. However, they are expensive, require extensive measurements, are not portable, and cannot assess larger individuals, along with radiation exposure [50]. DXA is a fast and simple method for measuring lean mass, which comprises both skeletal muscle mass and non-skeletal elements such as skin, connective tissue, and the fat-free portion of adipose tissue cells. However, DXA has some limitations, including high costs, exposure to radiation, limited equipment availability, and immobility of the patient [51,52]. BIA is an indirect method that uses electrical impedance to estimate muscle, lean, or fat-free mass. It involves running a low-level electrical current through the body and measuring the resistance, which is then used to calculate the amount of muscle present in the body. However, several variables, including the instrument itself, the electrodes, the operator, the participant, and the surrounding environment, can affect the precision and reliability of the measurements. Therefore, BIA measurements must be interpreted cautiously and in conjunction with other assessment methods to obtain more accurate muscle mass estimation [52-54].
Computed Tomography
CT analysis offers precise body composition data divided into lean and fat tissue depots. Unlike other techniques that only measure overall lean body mass, CT can provide more detailed information [55]. Single-slice scans can predict whole-body muscular and fat mass in healthy and cancer-bearing populations. Still, this association needs to be better understood in ICU patients and can vary from image to image [55]. An important bone landmark is the third lumbar vertebra for measuring skeletal muscle mass [56]. Skeletal muscle boundaries are identified based on Hounsfield units (HUs) and specialized software, including ImageJ and Slice-O-Matic, can be utilized to determine the muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) [57]. CSA indicates how much the tissue attenuates the X-ray beam during the scan. Attenuation of muscle, a measure of muscle density, is associated with lipid deposition in skeletal muscle. It acts as a proxy for muscle quality [55,58]. Both CSA and muscle attenuation have a strong prognostic value, with lower values linked to poorer outcomes. Analysts' variability is generally less than 2% [59].
CT scans can provide valuable information on body composition but have limitations. One of the main drawbacks is the high radiation exposure during prospective CT scans. Consequently, CT can only be used to measure body composition if a CT scan has been performed for a medical condition [60]. Additionally, the thickness of slices and patient placement are crucial variables to consider. A patient's position during the scan and the relaxation state of muscles in the L3 region can influence the number of slices in the L3 and CSAs during the scan [60]. Another concern is that HUs can be altered by various factors, even though they primarily represent tissue attenuation. While some researchers have used average CT HUs to assess muscle quality, the validity of this method is still being determined and requires further research with muscle biopsies [61].
Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
DXA is an advanced method for assessing body fat, lean muscle mass, and bone mineral mass that relies on X-ray attenuation principles like those used in CT but with considerably lower radiation exposure [62-65]. A DXA scan is preferred over a CT scan because of its safety and ease of access [66]. However, DXA scans only pass the energy beam down one side of the body, resulting in a planar image. DXA imaging uses two separate energy spectra—a "high" and a "low" energy level—to detect attenuation [67]. By calculating the RST in which R value represents the ratio of photon attenuation of soft tissue which is defined as the ratio of soft tissue attenuation at two photon energies (e.g., 40 keV and 70 keV), it can be predicted what the percentage of body mass is composed of the percentage of body fat (%fat) [67].
Common technological limitations in DXA include issues related to patient location, as well as differences between devices and software [68]. Physical limitations include the patient's height and weight, their level of hydration, and the timing of the scan about daily activities such as meal timing, bathroom habits, and exercise [69-71]. While slight variations in hydration are generally not thought to affect body composition measurements, disease-related fluid accumulation such as ascites or oedema can impact the results [70-72]. Additionally, this procedure is highly costly [49].
Bioimpedance
Bioimpedance is a technique for estimating body composition involving devices that fall into three categories: single-frequency, multiple-frequency, and spectroscopy. All these devices work by applying a low-intensity alternating electric current via surface electrodes at one or more radio frequencies. This current helps to determine the body's conductive and non-conductive tissue and fluid components [52,73]. The rate of the applied current varies based on the body's composition, including total body water, fat-free mass, or fat mass. Tissues rich in water and electrolytes, such as blood and muscle, conduct the current well, while tissues with more fat, bone, and air-filled spaces conduct the current poorly [49].
Bioimpedance involves measuring the body's resistance and reactance to a weak electrical current at different radio frequencies, which depends on the body's composition. Reactance refers to how the current interacts with membrane surfaces, while resistance generally refers to the current's ability to travel through fluid and tissues like cell membranes [73]. Equations based on impedance measurements estimate fluid and other body composition compartments [52]. Bioimpedance measurements are useful for estimating metabolic activity and can be used therapeutically [74].
Bioimpedance, like DXA, is a reliable and convenient method for accumulating normative body composition data using single-frequency measurements. It can also measure nutrition-related markers beyond body composition, such as the 50-kHz phase angle, 200/5-kHz impedance ratio, and bioimpedance vector analysis [75]. Bioimpedance-generated estimates of body composition are subject to several assumptions that may not hold in a clinical setting, including fluid status, tissue hydration, and body geometry [76]. Obesity and fluid overload further complicate these methods' accuracy. Although BIS algorithms use different constants customized for each patient, they may still introduce errors. While improved algorithms can be applied in a research setting, applying them at the bedside presents significant challenges [49]. Currently, bioimpedance is the most convenient and precise tool for measuring body composition at the patient's bedside. However, notable variations between the different techniques need to be considered. Irrespective of the approach, standardized procedures are imperative when performing bioimpedance measurements. For investigations, it is recommended that only one technician use the same device and equation/algorithm [76].
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
MRI is a method for determining muscle CSA and volume that is non-invasive and free of radioactivity, and it provides excellent tissue differentiation capabilities. As a result, MRI is regarded as the standard for evaluating changes in muscle size. However, MRI imaging requires highly trained personnel and is limited by the cost of operations, availability and time-consuming post-acquisition processing [77].
Ultrasound
Clinical assessment is supplemented with volition and neurophysiology testing to diagnose ICU-AW. However, when patients receive mechanical ventilation, many are administered strong sedatives during the initial stages of critical illness. As a consequence, diagnosing ICU-AW may be delayed [78]. Ultrasound is a promising diagnostic tool for identifying individuals at risk of ICU-AW. It is a low-cost, non-invasive, widely available, and efficient imaging technique that can assess skeletal and respiratory muscles. The five main parameters used for ultrasound muscle assessment include muscle thickness, CSA, pennation angle, fascicle length, and echo intensity. Furthermore, researchers have identified four new potential parameters for ultrasound muscle assessment. These parameters include muscle volume, measuring muscle stiffness through elastography, evaluating the ability of a muscle to contract by comparing its CSA at rest and during maximal contraction, and assessing the microcirculation of a muscle [79].

Assessment of peripheral skeletal muscle

Research has shown that sarcopenia, which refers to the deterioration of muscle mass and strength with age, is more prominent in the lower limb muscles than in the upper limb muscles. Furthermore, there is a strong correlation between muscle strength and the CSA of the rectus femoris (RF) muscle. Studies conducted in ICU have shown that muscle mass can decrease rapidly, with a 10% decline in the RF' CSA within 7 days [80].

Assessment of respiratory muscles by ultrasound

Ultrasound technology has been used to assess respiratory muscles since Kai Haber et al., first utilized it to evaluate diaphragmatic motion in patients with intra-abdominal illnesses [81]. The diaphragm is the most significant respiratory muscle, accounting for almost 70% of total lung capacity [82]. Diaphragm excursion (DE) and diaphragm thickening fraction (TFdi) are the two most used ultrasonography markers for assessing diaphragm function. DE represents the distance the diaphragm extends from the end of expiration to the end of inspiration. TFdi represents the percentage by which the diaphragm thickens during inspiration. A healthy individual breathing deeply typically has a DE of 4.7–7.6 cm and a TFdi of 42%–78%. Although DE and TFdi are commonly considered indicators of extubation outcomes, their accuracy has been debated [83].
For successful extubation, compensatory action from the intercostal, sternocleidomastoid, abdominal muscles, and other accessory respiratory muscles is necessary when the diaphragm is not functioning properly. Thus, muscle ultrasonography to assess respiratory muscle weakness should include these additional muscles, particularly the parasternal intercostal muscles, which play an important role as supplementary inspiratory muscles. TFic, the thickening fraction of the parasternal intercostal muscle during inspiration, indicates respiratory muscle function when the diaphragm is ineffective [83].
The parasternal intercostal muscle's thickness at end-expiration is 3.3 mm in healthy males and 2.2 mm in healthy females, with a typical TFic of 3% [84]. In Dres et al.'s study [84], which examined the relationship between TFic and respiratory stress, diaphragm function, and spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) outcomes, patients with lower levels of pressure support, diaphragm dysfunction, or SBT failure exhibited greater TFic than healthy individuals. Mechanically ventilated patients' TFic decreased with increasing pressure support, indicating a dose-response relationship between TFic and respiratory load. The predictive ability of TFdi >28.7% for extubation outcomes was comparable to that of TFic >9.5% in sensitivity and accuracy. While TFic and TFic/TFdi may not have significantly improved DE and TFdi as predictors of extubation outcomes, they provide healthcare providers with an alternative method and contribute to understanding the patient's balance between respiratory volume and capacity [83]. Evaluating the severity of respiratory problems can help determine when tracheostomies will be necessary and when mechanical ventilation will be weaned. If mechanical ventilation is prolonged or extubation fails, a tracheostomy may be required, while noninvasive mechanical ventilation and mechanically assisted coughing can help safely extubate patients with difficulty extubating [85]. Although ICU-AW complications are associated with higher mortality rates [86], longer ICU and hospital stays [87,88], and increased costs, it is often reversible within three weeks [89], though recovery may be incomplete [90,91], and prognosis may vary depending on the electrophysiological subtype, with CIP having a worse recovery prognosis compared to CIM [38,92]. The abdominal expiratory and lower limb muscles can also be evaluated by ultrasound to predict extubation outcomes in addition to the diaphragm and intercostals, especially for patients with suboptimal diaphragm or parasternal intercostal muscle function [93]. Muscle ultrasonography has yet to be extensively studied in diagnosing and predicting the prognosis of ICU-AW. Still, one study found that using ultrasound to measure the CSA of the RF and comparing it with frailty can effectively forecast the outcome of critically ill patients [94]. Another study observed that a larger CSA of the RF muscle on admission was associated with less muscle atrophy and fibre necrosis [95]. Additionally, the size of the quadriceps muscle as determined by ultrasound, has been linked with an increased risk of unplanned readmissions or mortality. Nevertheless, research has indicated that using ultrasound to measure muscle thickness (TH) for multiple muscles is not an accurate diagnostic tool [96]. According to a study in 2021 by Zhang et al. [39], changes in muscle ultrasound measurements using MRC criteria can effectively diagnose ICU-AW. The most effective cutoff ratios were a reduction of over 15% for muscle thickness (ΔTH day 10) and over 12% for CSA (ΔCSA day 10) in the lower extremity on the right side. As a result, muscle ultrasound can be considered a useful supplementary diagnostic tool for ICU-AW [39]. Although certain muscle parameter changes within 10 days effectively predict ICU-AW, SOFA and APACHE II scores during ICU admission are more advantageous in predicting ICU-AW occurrence. The latter scores are more time-efficient and easier to implement, with similar receiver operating characteristic-area under curve (ROC-AUC) scores compared to the changes in muscle parameters [97,98], even though muscle parameter changes over 10 days effectively predict ICU-AW, relying exclusively on them may not be necessary. At the same time, there are many validated predictors of ICU-AW; the SOFA and APACHE II scores can serve as indicators of multiple high-risk factors combined, making them more time-efficient and easier to implement. However, previous studies have shown that the SOFA and APACHE II scores alone are inadequate diagnostic tools [11,99]. Therefore, it is necessary to validate these findings further, considering the small sample size of the current study [39]. Table 1 shows the criteria for diagnosing ICU-AW from various imaging tests [100-107].
Preventive and Therapeutic Measures of ICU-AW
Unfortunately, there is still no cure for ICU-AW, while prevention has been successful when focusing on particular risk factors.
Avoiding Hyperglycemia
In two large trials, intensive insulin therapy with blood glucose levels below 110 mg/dl has been shown to reduce the risk of CIP and CIM, resulting in shorter periods of mechanical ventilation, shorter stays in the ICU, and a lower mortality rate over 180 days [20,108,109]. A study on Guillain-Barre syndrome also found blood glucose control to improve functional outcomes [6].
Avoiding Early Parenteral Nutrition
The optimal approach to nutritional management in the ICU, particularly in relation to early parenteral nutrition, is not fully comprehended. There is a recognized concern that using parenteral nutrition might have unfavorable consequences on ICU-AW risk, making enteral nutrition a more favorable choice [110]. Notably, it's intriguing to note that obesity offers some protection against ICU-AW risk. This safeguarding effect could likely be attributed to the presence of ketone bodies [111].
Amount of Calories
Even after adjusting for the severity of the illness, obtaining 80% of the recommended calories was related to lower mortality. However, significance needed to be recovered when accounting for the amount of proteins. This study shows that delivery of ≥80% of prescribed protein is associated with substantially reduced mortality, independently of energy intake. Furthermore, in the more severely injured or ill patients who stay in the ICU for 12 or more days, achieving ≥80% of prescribed protein also predicted a shorter time to discharge alive, an outcome that was independent of energy intake. The converse, that greater energy intake affected outcomes positively when adjusting for protein intake, could not be demonstrated. they could not see any beneficial association between greater energy intake and outcomes. Efforts to achieve >80% of the prescribed protein intake are warranted. However, further studies are needed to determine the optimal amount of protein that critically ill patients require to maximize their chances of survival and recovery [112]. Muscle atrophy and weakness have been linked to the caloric deficit caused by critical illness-related anorexia and gastrointestinal dysfunction [113].
Number of Proteins and Route of Nutrition
Early and complete enteral feeding is recommended to prevent muscle atrophy in critically ill patients, with parenteral supplementation as an option if necessary. Increasing protein supply in nutritional support is important to counter muscle protein depletion. Delaying the administration of parenteral nutrition beyond the first week may protect against ICU- AW, but the optimal timing for its introduction is uncertain [114-116].
Quality of Protein
It is advisable to consider the specific types of proteins or amino acids proven particularly advantageous in preserving muscle mass. A third or more of the proteins that make up muscle mass are branched-chain amino acids. Despite this, administering branched-chain amino acids has not improved the prognosis. The most extensively researched branched-chain amino acid is leucine. Research has linked its metabolites, alpha-isocaproate and beta-hydroxy-beta-methyl butyrate (HMB), to reduced protein catabolism under acute stress conditions and to ergogenic effects in muscle [117]. HMB has been demonstrated to minimize proteolysis and muscle damage, enhance lean mass and strength in young and older adults when accompanied by a physical exercise program [118-120], and prevent muscle loss associated with bed confinement in healthy participants [121]. Obesity is found to have a protective effect on the risk of ICU-AW, which may be due to the presence of ketone bodies [111].
Minimizing Sedation and Early Mobilization
Early movement and physical therapy can lower the risk of ICU-AW. At the same time, daily sedative infusion stoppage can shorten mechanical ventilation and ICU stay, indirectly reducing the risk of ICU-AW [122]. High-frequency physiotherapy in the ICU has been suggested to improve quality of life at 6 months. Early rehabilitation has been found to strengthen only short-term physical-related outcomes. There is low-quality evidence for a reduced likelihood of ICU-AW compared to standard treatment or no early rehabilitation [123]. The current ICU approach emphasizes early mobilization through exercises, but more clinical trials are needed while considering patient pain. One-third of ICU-AW patients die in the acute phase, another third regain mobility within 4 months, and many experience long-term sensory loss, atrophy, or focal weakness [124].
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
The use of Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) as a substitute for mobilization has been suggested. Despite a few small randomized controlled trials (RCTs) being carried out on critically ill patients with NMES of varying frequency, intensity, and duration, with some encouraging results, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that there was no significant difference between standard care and NMES in terms of muscular strength or reliance on mechanical ventilation and intensive care [125].
Drugs
(1) Anabolic hormones: although anabolic hormones such as growth hormone, insulin like growth factor -1, and nandrolone can increase muscle mass, they do not qualify as first-line therapy due to complications. Their use may be restricted to chronic critically ill patients [126]. (2) Beta-blockers: these are effective but only for oral use (propranolol). Inotropic medications which emphasize muscular dysfunction rather than atrophy by boosting intracellular calcium flux, beta-adrenergic agonists (fenoterol, not albuterol) have beneficial inotropic effects. Additionally, individuals with chronic bronchitis (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) who had mechanical ventilation with the infusion of dopamine reported positive outcomes (diaphragmatic perfusion and cardiac output). Levosimendan, a calcium sensitizer, increases neuromechanical effectiveness and reduces contraction fatigue. These treatments were all identified in a systematic assessment of initially promising pharmaceutical approaches as unsuitable for routine use [127].
(3) Inflammatory modulation: treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) was linked to a lower incidence of ICU-AW, according to a retrospective review [128]. A RCT was conducted to determine whether early treatment with IgM-enriched IVIg could reduce ICU-AW in patients with multi-organ failure. Still, the problem was prematurely stopped due to the interventions [129]. (4) Cytokines are produced less when NF-kB is inhibited. On the other hand, although toll-like receptor 4's proteolytic effects are known, using a blocker of these receptors (eritoran) did not help septic patients' prognoses. New perspectives have been opened with the identification of novel inflammatory mediators such as GFD-15 [130].
(5) Contradictory effects of corticosteroids include the fact that. In contrast, low dosages of methylprednisolone (5 mg/kg) increase diaphragmatic dysfunction. In comparison, large doses of the drug (30 mg/kg) seem to shield the diaphragm from the negative effects of mechanical ventilation [131]. (6) Mesenchymal stem cell therapy has been shown to restore mitochondrial function in satellite cells in a mouse model of sepsis [132].
ICU-AW is a common and potentially life-threatening complication in ICU patients which can be prevented through reducing sedation, insulin therapy, and early mobilization. Although multiple methods have been developed for the detection of ICU-AW, each method has its own advantages and limitations. The bedside ultrasound has proven to be the most reliable, safe, and cost-effective tool for muscle assessment and detection of ICU-AW. The combination of the SOFA score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score assessment, and Ultrasound can be a convenient approach for the early detection of ICU-AW. This approach can facilitate timely intervention and prevent the catastrophic consequences associated with ICU-AW. However, further studies are necessary to reinforce the evidence supporting this approach.
▪ Intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) is a common and potentially life-threatening complication in critically ill patients, and early detection is crucial for timely intervention.
▪ Bedside ultrasound is the most reliable and cost-effective tool for muscle assessment and detection of ICU-AW, and a combination of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores with ultrasound can be a convenient approach for early detection and monitoring of ICU-AW.
▪ As there is no treatment, prevention of ICU-AW is so important and can be achieved through early mobility, avoiding hyperglycemia, optimizing nutrition, and minimizing sedation.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

FUNDING

None.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization: HE, WA. Methodology: HE, WA. Formal analysis: HE, WA. Data curation: HE, WA.

Visualization: HE, WA. Project administration: HE, WA. Writing–original draft: HE, WA. Writing–review & editing: all authors.

None.
Figure 1.
Pathophysiology, risk factors, and consequences of intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW). ADLS: activity of daily livings; TNF: tumor necrosis factor; IL: interleukin.
a) Drugs: like vasoactive medication as B-Blockers (+), corticosteroids (±), neuromuscular blocking agents (–) combined with corticosteroids infused for more than 48 hours (+), certain antibiotics as clindamycin, erythromycin, quinolones, polymyxin, tetracycline and vancomycin which act on neuromuscular junction but not proven to be the sole cause for ICU-AW (±).
acc-2023-00703f1.jpg
Table 1.
Criteria for diagnosing ICU-AW from various imaging tests
Different types of imaging Diagnostic criteria
Computed tomography Through measured Fat volume: the total volume ratio to provide the overall fat percentage as a surrogate for muscle atrophy. Fat volume was defined as the summated volume of pixels with attenuation coefficients between –50 and –250 Hounsfield units, the known attenuation range for fat [100].
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry Percent fat mass increased, whereas the lean mass decreased for the whole body, trunk, and legs [101].
Bioimpedance Bioimpedance equation was developed for fat-free mass and may produce substantial scaling errors when compared against total body water measures. Studies that focus on evaluating a bioimpedance method’s ability to measure changes in muscle volume or mass [102].
Magnetic resonance imaging Extensive muscle atrophy, fatty infiltration (replacement of muscle with fat), and edema (fluid accumulation) within muscles show hyperintensity, which was more florid in the lower limbs and pelvic muscles. There is a lesser extent of involvement in the upper limbs, possibly due to a smaller volume of muscles in the upper extremity [103].
Ultrasound • Decrease of muscle strength relates to muscle volume, the latter may be inferred from its CSA. Some authors tried to predict CSA directly from muscle thickness [104].
• Change in muscle composition can be gathered by quantification of muscle echogenicity [105].
• The angle of insertion of muscle fibers into the aponeurosis. This angle provides information about muscle strength, as the greater the pennation angle, the more the contractile material packed within a given volume and by inference, the higher is the muscle’s capacity to generate force. The loss of pennation angle seemed to have high diagnostic accuracy for ICU-AW and could be assessed before patients became able to perform volitional tests, allowing for earlier diagnosis. Even if these results are considered as an exploratory background for more focused studies, the monitoring of changes to muscle architecture may lead to timely detection and better quantification of muscle loss [106,107].

ICU-AW: intensive care unit-acquired weakness; CSA: cross-sectional area.

  • 1. Wang W, Xu C, Ma X, Zhang X, Xie P. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a review of recent progress with a look toward the future. Front Med (Lausanne) 2020;7:559789. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 2. Stevens RD, Marshall SA, Cornblath DR, Hoke A, Needham DM, de Jonghe B, et al. A framework for diagnosing and classifying intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Crit Care Med 2009;37:S299-308.ArticlePubMed
  • 3. Kramer CL. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Neurol Clin 2017;35:723-36.ArticlePubMed
  • 4. Wilcox SR. Corticosteroids and neuromuscular blockers in development of critical illness neuromuscular abnormalities: a historical review. J Crit Care 2017;37:149-55.ArticlePubMed
  • 5. Pattanshetty RB, Gaude GS. Critical illness myopathy and polyneuropathy: a challenge for physiotherapists in the intensive care units. Indian J Crit Care Med 2011;15:78-81.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 6. Tortuyaux R, Davion JB, Jourdain M. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness: questions the clinician should ask. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2022;178:84-92.ArticlePubMed
  • 7. Piva S, Fagoni N, Latronico N. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness: unanswered questions and targets for future research. F1000Res 2019;8:F1000 Faculty Rev-508. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 8. Murthy S, Leligdowicz A, Adhikari NK. Intensive care unit capacity in low-income countries: a systematic review. PLoS One 2015;10:e0116949.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 9. Farhan H, Moreno-Duarte I, Latronico N, Zafonte R, Eikermann M. Acquired muscle weakness in the surgical intensive care unit: nosology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and prevention. Anesthesiology 2016;124:207-34.PubMed
  • 10. Li Z, Zhang Q, Zhang P, Sun R, Jiang H, Wan J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for intensive care unit acquired weakness: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:e22013.PubMedPMC
  • 11. Wieske L, Witteveen E, Verhamme C, Dettling-Ihnenfeldt DS, van der Schaaf M, Schultz MJ, et al. Early prediction of intensive care unit-acquired weakness using easily available parameters: a prospective observational study. PLoS One 2014;9:e111259.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 12. Schweickert WD, Pohlman MC, Pohlman AS, Nigos C, Pawlik AJ, Esbrook CL, et al. Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;373:1874-82.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 13. Rodriguez PO, Setten M, Maskin LP, Bonelli I, Vidomlansky SR, Attie S, et al. Muscle weakness in septic patients requiring mechanical ventilation: protective effect of transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation. J Crit Care 2012;27:319. Article
  • 14. Wu Y, Zhang Z, Jiang B, Wang G, Wei H, Li B, et al. Current practice and barriers to ICU-acquired weakness assessment: a cross-sectional survey. Physiotherapy 2021;112:135-42.ArticlePubMed
  • 15. Latronico N, Herridge M, Hopkins RO, Angus D, Hart N, Hermans G, et al. The ICM research agenda on intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Intensive Care Med 2017;43:1270-81.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 16. Yang T, Li Z, Jiang L, Wang Y, Xi X. Risk factors for intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurol Scand 2018;138:104-14.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 17. Li M, Shao H, Wang C, Chen C, Ye L, Ding M, et al. Risk factors and their predictive value for intensive care unit acquired weakness in patients with sepsis. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 2021;33:648-53.PubMed
  • 18. Eikermann M, Koch G, Gerwig M, Ochterbeck C, Beiderlinden M, Koeppen S, et al. Muscle force and fatigue in patients with sepsis and multiorgan failure. Intensive Care Med 2006;32:251-9.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 19. Gordon BS, Kelleher AR, Kimball SR. Regulation of muscle protein synthesis and the effects of catabolic states. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2013;45:2147-57.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 20. Hermans G, Wilmer A, Meersseman W, Milants I, Wouters PJ, Bobbaers H, et al. Impact of intensive insulin therapy on neuromuscular complications and ventilator dependency in the medical intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;175:480-9.ArticlePubMed
  • 21. Brunello AG, Haenggi M, Wigger O, Porta F, Takala J, Jakob SM. Usefulness of a clinical diagnosis of ICU-acquired paresis to predict outcome in patients with SIRS and acute respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med 2010;36:66-74.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 22. Derde S, Hermans G, Derese I, Güiza F, Hedström Y, Wouters PJ, et al. Muscle atrophy and preferential loss of myosin in prolonged critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2012;40:79-89.ArticlePubMed
  • 23. Kress JP, Hall JB. ICU-acquired weakness and recovery from critical illness. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1626-35.ArticlePubMed
  • 24. Friedrich O, Reid MB, Van den Berghe G, Vanhorebeek I, Hermans G, Rich MM, et al. The sick and the weak: neuropathies/myopathies in the critically ill. Physiol Rev 2015;95:1025-109.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 25. Vanhorebeek I, Gunst J, Derde S, Derese I, Boussemaere M, Güiza F, et al. Insufficient activation of autophagy allows cellular damage to accumulate in critically ill patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:E633-45.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 26. Hermans G, Casaer MP, Clerckx B, Güiza F, Vanhullebusch T, Derde S, et al. Effect of tolerating macronutrient deficit on the development of intensive-care unit acquired weakness: a subanalysis of the EPaNIC trial. Lancet Respir Med 2013;1:621-9.ArticlePubMed
  • 27. Latronico N, Friedrich O. Electrophysiological investigations of peripheral nerves and muscles: a method for looking at cell dysfunction in the critically ill patients. Crit Care 2019;23:33. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 28. Ozdemir M, Bomkamp MP, Hyatt HW, Smuder AJ, Powers SK. Intensive care unit acquired weakness is associated with rapid changes to skeletal muscle proteostasis. Cells 2022;11:4005. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 29. Vanhorebeek I, Latronico N, Van den Berghe G. ICU-acquired weakness. Intensive Care Med 2020;46:637-53.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 30. De Jonghe B, Bastuji-Garin S, Durand MC, Malissin I, Rodrigues P, Cerf C, et al. Respiratory weakness is associated with limb weakness and delayed weaning in critical illness. Crit Care Med 2007;35:2007-15.ArticlePubMed
  • 31. Jeong BH, Nam J, Ko MG, Chung CR, Suh GY, Jeon K. Impact of limb weakness on extubation failure after planned extubation in medical patients. Respirology 2018;Apr 11; [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.13305.Article
  • 32. Zuercher P, Moret CS, Dziewas R, Schefold JC. Dysphagia in the intensive care unit: epidemiology, mechanisms, and clinical management. Crit Care 2019;23:103. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 33. Hermans G, Van Aerde N, Meersseman P, Van Mechelen H, Debaveye Y, Wilmer A, et al. Five-year mortality and morbidity impact of prolonged versus brief ICU stay: a propensity score matched cohort study. Thorax 2019;74:1037-45.ArticlePubMed
  • 34. Dres M, Dubé BP, Mayaux J, Delemazure J, Reuter D, Brochard L, et al. Coexistence and impact of limb muscle and diaphragm weakness at time of liberation from mechanical ventilation in medical intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;195:57-66.ArticlePubMed
  • 35. Medrinal C, Prieur G, Frenoy É, Robledo Quesada A, Poncet A, Bonnevie T, et al. Respiratory weakness after mechanical ventilation is associated with one-year mortality: a prospective study. Crit Care 2016;20:231. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 36. Dinglas VD, Aronson Friedman L, Colantuoni E, Mendez-Tellez PA, Shanholtz CB, Ciesla ND, et al. Muscle weakness and 5-year survival in acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors. Crit Care Med 2017;45:446-53.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 37. Wieske L, Dettling-Ihnenfeldt DS, Verhamme C, Nollet F, van Schaik IN, Schultz MJ, et al. Impact of ICU-acquired weakness on post-ICU physical functioning: a follow-up study. Crit Care 2015;19:196. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 38. Guarneri B, Bertolini G, Latronico N. Long-term outcome in patients with critical illness myopathy or neuropathy: the Italian multicentre CRIMYNE study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:838-41.ArticlePubMed
  • 39. Zhang W, Wu J, Gu Q, Gu Y, Zhao Y, Ge X, et al. Changes in muscle ultrasound for the diagnosis of intensive care unit acquired weakness in critically ill patients. Sci Rep 2021;11:18280. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 40. Amador T, Saturnino S, Veloso A, Ziviani N. Early identification of ICU patients at risk of complications: regularization based on robustness and stability of explanations. Artif Intell Med 2022;128:102283. ArticlePubMed
  • 41. Kelmenson DA, Quan D, Moss M. What is the diagnostic accuracy of single nerve conduction studies and muscle ultrasound to identify critical illness polyneuromyopathy: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care 2018;22:342. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 42. Vanpee G, Hermans G, Segers J, Gosselink R. Assessment of limb muscle strength in critically ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2014;42:701-11.PubMed
  • 43. Hermans G, Clerckx B, Vanhullebusch T, Segers J, Vanpee G, Robbeets C, et al. Interobserver agreement of Medical Research Council sum-score and handgrip strength in the intensive care unit. Muscle Nerve 2012;45:18-25.ArticlePubMed
  • 44. Parry SM, Berney S, Granger CL, Dunlop DL, Murphy L, El-Ansary D, et al. A new two-tier strength assessment approach to the diagnosis of weakness in intensive care: an observational study. Crit Care 2015;19:52. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 45. Mehmet H, Yang AW, Robinson SR. Measurement of hand grip strength in the elderly: a scoping review with recommendations. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2020;24:235-43.Article
  • 46. Denehy L, Skinner EH, Edbrooke L, Haines K, Warrillow S, Hawthorne G, et al. Exercise rehabilitation for patients with critical illness: a randomized controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up. Crit Care 2013;17:R156. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 47. Salbach NM, O'Brien KK, Brooks D, Irvin E, Martino R, Takhar P, et al. Reference values for standardized tests of walking speed and distance: a systematic review. Gait Posture 2015;41:341-60.ArticlePubMed
  • 48. Latronico N, Bertolini G, Guarneri B, Botteri M, Peli E, Andreoletti S, et al. Simplified electrophysiological evaluation of peripheral nerves in critically ill patients: the Italian multi-centre CRIMYNE study. Crit Care 2007;11:R11. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 49. Teigen LM, Kuchnia AJ, Mourtzakis M, Earthman CP. The use of technology for estimating body composition: strengths and weaknesses of common modalities in a clinical setting. Nutr Clin Pract 2017;32:20-9.PubMed
  • 50. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019;48:16-31.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 51. Meza-Valderrama D, Marco E, Muñoz-Redondo E, Morgado-Pérez A, Sánchez MT, Curbelo Peña Y, et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasound shows muscle mass changes during post-acute care hospitalization in older men: a prospective cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:15150. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 52. Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Gómez JM, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis: part I. Review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr 2004;23:1226-43.ArticlePubMed
  • 53. Beaudart C, Bruyère O, Geerinck A, Hajaoui M, Scafoglieri A, Perkisas S, et al. Equation models developed with bioelectric impedance analysis tools to assess muscle mass: a systematic review. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2020;35:47-62.ArticlePubMed
  • 54. Gonzalez MC, Barbosa-Silva TG, Heymsfield SB. Bioelectrical impedance analysis in the assessment of sarcopenia. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2018;21:366-74.ArticlePubMed
  • 55. Paris M, Mourtzakis M. Assessment of skeletal muscle mass in critically ill patients: considerations for the utility of computed tomography imaging and ultrasonography. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2016;19:125-30.PubMed
  • 56. Shen W, Punyanitya M, Wang Z, Gallagher D, St-Onge MP, Albu J, et al. Total body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes: estimation from a single abdominal cross-sectional image. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2004;97:2333-8.ArticlePubMed
  • 57. Lambell KJ, Tierney AC, Wang JC, Nanjayya V, Forsyth A, Goh GS, et al. Comparison of ultrasound-derived muscle thickness with computed tomography muscle cross-sectional area on admission to the intensive care unit: a pilot cross-sectional study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2021;45:136-45.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 58. Landrum LM, Java J, Mathews CA, Lanneau GS, Copeland LJ, Armstrong DK, et al. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2013;130:12-8.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 59. Jones EJ, Bishop PA, Woods AK, Green JM. Cross-sectional area and muscular strength: a brief review. Sports Med 2008;38:987-94.PubMed
  • 60. Bowden JC, Williams LJ, Simms A, Price A, Campbell S, Fallon MT, et al. Prediction of 90 day and overall survival after chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer: role of performance status and body composition. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2017;29:576-84.ArticlePubMed
  • 61. Kumar A, Moynagh MR, Multinu F, Cliby WA, McGree ME, Weaver AL, et al. Muscle composition measured by CT scan is a measurable predictor of overall survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2016;142:311-6.ArticlePubMed
  • 62. El Ghoch M, Pourhassan M, Milanese C, Müller MJ, Calugi S, Bazzani PV, et al. Changes in lean and skeletal muscle body mass in adult females with anorexia nervosa before and after weight restoration. Clin Nutr 2017;36:170-8.ArticlePubMed
  • 63. Barbour LA, Hernandez TL, Reynolds RM, Reece MS, Chartier-Logan C, Anderson MK, et al. Striking differences in estimates of infant adiposity by new and old DXA software, PEAPOD and skin-folds at 2 weeks and 1 year of life. Pediatr Obes 2016;11:264-71.PubMed
  • 64. Orgel E, Mueske NM, Sposto R, Gilsanz V, Freyer DR, Mittelman SD. Limitations of body mass index to assess body composition due to sarcopenic obesity during leukemia therapy. Leuk Lymphoma 2018;59:138-45.ArticlePubMed
  • 65. Pelletier CA, Miyatani M, Giangregorio L, Craven BC. Sarcopenic obesity in adults with spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016;97:1931-7.ArticlePubMed
  • 66. Mourtzakis M, Prado CM, Lieffers JR, Reiman T, McCargar LJ, Baracos VE. A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2008;33:997-1006.ArticlePubMed
  • 67. Plank LD. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2005;8:305-9.ArticlePubMed
  • 68. Kerr A, Slater GJ, Byrne N, Nana A. Reliability of 2 different positioning protocols for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement of body composition in healthy adults. J Clin Densitom 2016;19:282-9.ArticlePubMed
  • 69. Nana A, Slater GJ, Hopkins WG, Burke LM. Effects of daily activities on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of body composition in active people. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012;44:180-9.ArticlePubMed
  • 70. Norcross J, Van Loan MD. Validation of fan beam dual energy X ray absorptiometry for body composition assessment in adults aged 18-45 years. Br J Sports Med 2004;38:472-6.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 71. Jayanama K, Putadechakun S, Srisuwarn P, Vallibhakara SA, Chattranukulchai Shantavasinkul P, Sritara C, et al. Evaluation of body composition in hemodialysis thai patients: comparison between two models of bioelectrical impedance analyzer and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Nutr Metab 2018;2018:4537623. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 72. Shepherd JA, Ng BK, Sommer MJ, Heymsfield SB. Body composition by DXA. Bone 2017;104:101-5.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 73. Matthie JR. Bioimpedance measurements of human body composition: critical analysis and outlook. Expert Rev Med Devices 2008;5:239-61.ArticlePubMed
  • 74. Earthman C, Traughber D, Dobratz J, Howell W. Bioimpedance spectroscopy for clinical assessment of fluid distribution and body cell mass. Nutr Clin Pract 2007;22:389-405.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 75. Ward LC. Bioelectrical impedance analysis for body composition assessment: reflections on accuracy, clinical utility, and standardisation. Eur J Clin Nutr 2019;73:194-9.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 76. Earthman CP. Body composition tools for assessment of adult malnutrition at the bedside: a tutorial on research considerations and clinical applications. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2015;39:787-822.PubMed
  • 77. Erlandson MC, Lorbergs AL, Mathur S, Cheung AM. Muscle analysis using pQCT, DXA and MRI. Eur J Radiol 2016;85:1505-11.ArticlePubMed
  • 78. Harvey PD. Clinical applications of neuropsychological assessment. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2012;14:91-9.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 79. Perkisas S, Bastijns S, Baudry S, Bauer J, Beaudart C, Beckwée D, et al. Application of ultrasound for muscle assessment in sarcopenia: 2020 SARCUS update. Eur Geriatr Med 2021;12:45-59.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 80. van Ruijven IM, Stapel SN, Molinger J, Weijs PJ. Monitoring muscle mass using ultrasound: a key role in critical care. Curr Opin Crit Care 2021;27:354-60.ArticlePubMed
  • 81. Boussuges A, Rives S, Finance J, Brégeon F. Assessment of diaphragmatic function by ultrasonography: current approach and perspectives. World J Clin Cases 2020;8:2408-24.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 82. Fayssoil A, Behin A, Ogna A, Mompoint D, Amthor H, Clair B, et al. Diaphragm: pathophysiology and ultrasound imaging in neuromuscular disorders. J Neuromuscul Dis 2018;5:1-10.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 83. Xue S, Xu M, Gu XP, Ma ZL, Liu Y, Zhang W. Advances in ultrasound assessment of respiratory muscle function. J Clin Anesth 2022;81:110914. ArticlePubMed
  • 84. Dres M, Dubé BP, Goligher E, Vorona S, Demiri S, Morawiec E, et al. Usefulness of parasternal intercostal muscle ultrasound during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 2020;132:1114-25.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 85. Bernardes Neto SC, Torres-Castro R, Lima Í, Resqueti VR, Fregonezi GA. Weaning from mechanical ventilation in people with neuromuscular disease: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2021;11:e047449.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 86. Garnacho-Montero J, Madrazo-Osuna J, García-Garmendia JL, Ortiz-Leyba C, Jiménez-Jiménez FJ, Barrero-Almodóvar A, et al. Critical illness polyneuropathy: risk factors and clinical consequences. A cohort study in septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2001;27:1288-96.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 87. Wolfe KS, Patel BK, MacKenzie EL, Giovanni SP, Pohlman AS, Churpek MM, et al. Impact of vasoactive medications on ICU-acquired weakness in mechanically ventilated patients. Chest 2018;154:781-7.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 88. Garnacho-Montero J, Amaya-Villar R, García-Garmendía JL, Madrazo-Osuna J, Ortiz-Leyba C. Effect of critical illness polyneuropathy on the withdrawal from mechanical ventilation and the length of stay in septic patients. Crit Care Med 2005;33:349-54.ArticlePubMed
  • 89. De Jonghe B, Sharshar T, Lefaucheur JP, Authier FJ, Durand-Zaleski I, Boussarsar M, et al. Paresis acquired in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter study. JAMA 2002;288:2859-67.ArticlePubMed
  • 90. Herridge MS, Cheung AM, Tansey CM, Matte-Martyn A, Diaz-Granados N, Al-Saidi F, et al. One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2003;348:683-93.ArticlePubMed
  • 91. Herridge MS, Tansey CM, Matté A, Tomlinson G, Diaz-Granados N, Cooper A, et al. Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1293-304.ArticlePubMed
  • 92. Koch S, Wollersheim T, Bierbrauer J, Haas K, Mörgeli R, Deja M, et al. Long-term recovery In critical illness myopathy is complete, contrary to polyneuropathy. Muscle Nerve 2014;50:431-6.ArticlePubMed
  • 93. Formenti P, Umbrello M, Dres M, Chiumello D. Ultrasonographic assessment of parasternal intercostal muscles during mechanical ventilation. Ann Intensive Care 2020;10:120. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 94. Mueller N, Murthy S, Tainter CR, Lee J, Riddell K, Fintelmann FJ, et al. Can sarcopenia quantified by ultrasound of the rectus femoris muscle predict adverse outcome of surgical intensive care unit patients as well as frailty? A prospective, observational cohort study. Ann Surg 2016;264:1116-24.ArticlePubMed
  • 95. Puthucheary ZA, Phadke R, Rawal J, McPhail MJ, Sidhu PS, Rowlerson A, et al. Qualitative ultrasound in acute critical illness muscle wasting. Crit Care Med 2015;43:1603-11.ArticlePubMed
  • 96. Greening NJ, Harvey-Dunstan TC, Chaplin EJ, Vincent EE, Morgan MD, Singh SJ, et al. Bedside assessment of quadriceps muscle by ultrasound after admission for acute exacerbations of chronic respiratory disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;192:810-6.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 97. Horn J, Hermans G. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Handb Clin Neurol 2017;141:531-43.ArticlePubMed
  • 98. de Jonghe B, Lacherade JC, Sharshar T, Outin H. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness: risk factors and prevention. Crit Care Med 2009;37:S309-15.ArticlePubMed
  • 99. Witteveen E, Wieske L, Sommers J, Spijkstra JJ, de Waard MC, Endeman H, et al. Early prediction of intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a multicenter external validation study. J Intensive Care Med 2020;35:595-605.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 100. Kubiak CA, Ranganathan K, Matusko N, Jacobson JA, Wang SC, Park PK, et al. Computed tomography evidence of psoas muscle atrophy without concomitant tendon wasting in early sepsis. J Surg Res 2019;234:210-6.ArticlePubMed
  • 101. Chan KS, Mourtzakis M, Aronson Friedman L, Dinglas VD, Hough CL, Ely EW, et al. Evaluating muscle mass in survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a 1-year multicenter longitudinal study. Crit Care Med 2018;46:1238-46.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 102. Baldwin CE, Fetterplace K, Beach L, Kayambu G, Paratz J, Earthman C, et al. Early detection of muscle weakness and functional limitations in the critically ill: a retrospective evaluation of bioimpedance spectroscopy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2020;44:837-48.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 103. Maramattom BV. Screening power of short tau inversion recovery muscle magnetic resonance imaging in critical illness myoneuropathy and guillain-barre syndrome in the intensive care unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26:204-9.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 104. Dupont AC, Sauerbrei EE, Fenton PV, Shragge PC, Loeb GE, Richmond FJ. Real-time sonography to estimate muscle thickness: comparison with MRI and CT. J Clin Ultrasound 2001;29:230-6.ArticlePubMed
  • 105. Pillen S, van Dijk JP, Weijers G, Raijmann W, de Korte CL, Zwarts MJ. Quantitative gray-scale analysis in skeletal muscle ultrasound: a comparison study of two ultrasound devices. Muscle Nerve 2009;39:781-6.ArticlePubMed
  • 106. Strasser EM, Draskovits T, Praschak M, Quittan M, Graf A. Association between ultrasound measurements of muscle thickness, pennation angle, echogenicity and skeletal muscle strength in the elderly. Age (Dordr) 2013;35:2377-88.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 107. Paolo F, Valentina G, Silvia C, Tommaso P, Elena C, Martin D, et al. The possible predictive value of muscle ultrasound in the diagnosis of ICUAW in long-term critically ill patients. J Crit Care 2022;71:154104. ArticlePubMed
  • 108. Van den Berghe G, Schoonheydt K, Becx P, Bruyninckx F, Wouters PJ. Insulin therapy protects the central and peripheral nervous system of intensive care patients. Neurology 2005;64:1348-53.ArticlePubMed
  • 109. Hermans G, De Jonghe B, Bruyninckx F, Van den Berghe G. Interventions for preventing critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;2014:CD006832. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 110. Singer P, Blaser AR, Berger MM, Alhazzani W, Calder PC, Casaer MP, et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr 2019;38:48-79.ArticlePubMed
  • 111. Goossens C, Weckx R, Derde S, Dufour T, Vander Perre S, Pauwels L, et al. Adipose tissue protects against sepsis-induced muscle weakness in mice: from lipolysis to ketones. Crit Care 2019;23:236. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 112. Nicolo M, Heyland DK, Chittams J, Sammarco T, Compher C. Clinical outcomes related to protein delivery in a critically ill population: a multicenter, multinational observation study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2016;40:45-51.PubMed
  • 113. Gunst J, Van den Berghe G. Intensive care nutrition and post-intensive care recovery. Crit Care Clin 2018;34:573-83.ArticlePubMed
  • 114. Singer P, Berger MM, Van den Berghe G, Biolo G, Calder P, Forbes A, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: intensive care. Clin Nutr 2009;28:387-400.ArticlePubMed
  • 115. Casaer MP, Mesotten D, Hermans G, Wouters PJ, Schetz M, Meyfroidt G, et al. Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med 2011;365:506-17.ArticlePubMed
  • 116. Walters J. Weakness in the intensive care unit. Pract Neurol 2022;22:358-75.Article
  • 117. Wilson GJ, Wilson JM, Manninen AH. Effects of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB) on exercise performance and body composition across varying levels of age, sex, and training experience: a review. Nutr Metab (Lond) 2008;5:1. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 118. Panton LB, Rathmacher JA, Baier S, Nissen S. Nutritional supplementation of the leucine metabolite beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (hmb) during resistance training. Nutrition 2000;16:734-9.ArticlePubMed
  • 119. Vukovich MD, Stubbs NB, Bohlken RM. Body composition in 70-year-old adults responds to dietary beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate similarly to that of young adults. J Nutr 2001;131:2049-52.PubMed
  • 120. Gallagher PM, Carrithers JA, Godard MP, Schulze KE, Trappe SW. Beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate ingestion, Part I: effects on strength and fat free mass. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32:2109-15.PubMed
  • 121. Deutz NE, Pereira SL, Hays NP, Oliver JS, Edens NK, Evans CM, et al. Effect of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB) on lean body mass during 10 days of bed rest in older adults. Clin Nutr 2013;32:704-12.ArticlePubMed
  • 122. Kress JP, Pohlman AS, O'Connor MF, Hall JB. Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1471-7.ArticlePubMed
  • 123. Fuke R, Hifumi T, Kondo Y, Hatakeyama J, Takei T, Yamakawa K, et al. Early rehabilitation to prevent postintensive care syndrome in patients with critical illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2018;8:e019998.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 124. Cameron S, Ball I, Cepinskas G, Choong K, Doherty TJ, Ellis CG, et al. Early mobilization in the critical care unit: a review of adult and pediatric literature. J Crit Care 2015;30:664-72.ArticlePubMed
  • 125. Knutson JS, Makowski NS, Kilgore KL, Chae J. 43: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation applications. In: Webster JB, Murphy DP, editors. Atlas of orthoses and assistive devices. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2019. p. 432-9.e3.
  • 126. Anderson LJ, Tamayose JM, Garcia JM. Use of growth hormone, IGF-I, and insulin for anabolic purpose: pharmacological basis, methods of detection, and adverse effects. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2018;464:65-74.ArticlePubMed
  • 127. Shepherd SJ, Newman R, Brett SJ, Griffith DM, Enhancing Rehabilitation After Critical Illness Programme Study Investigators. Pharmacological therapy for the prevention and treatment of weakness after critical illness: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2016;44:1198-205.ArticlePubMed
  • 128. Werdan K. Pathophysiology of septic shock and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and various therapeutic approaches with special emphasis on immunoglobulins. Ther Apher 2001;5:115-22.ArticlePubMed
  • 129. Brunner R, Rinner W, Haberler C, Kitzberger R, Sycha T, Herkner H, et al. Early treatment with IgM-enriched intravenous immunoglobulin does not mitigate critical illness polyneuropathy and/or myopathy in patients with multiple organ failure and SIRS/sepsis: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial. Crit Care 2013;17:R213. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 130. Su CM, Wang L, Yoo D. Activation of NF-κB and induction of proinflammatory cytokine expressions mediated by ORF7a protein of SARS-CoV-2. Sci Rep 2021;11:13464. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 131. García-Martínez MÁ, Montejo González JC, García-de-Lorenzo Y Mateos A, Teijeira S. Muscle weakness: understanding the principles of myopathy and neuropathy in the critically ill patient and the management options. Clin Nutr 2020;39:1331-44.ArticlePubMed
  • 132. Rocheteau P, Chatre L, Briand D, Mebarki M, Jouvion G, Bardon J, et al. Sepsis induces long-term metabolic and mitochondrial muscle stem cell dysfunction amenable by mesenchymal stem cell therapy. Nat Commun 2015;6:10145. ArticlePubMedPDF

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • PubReader PubReader
      • ePub LinkePub Link
      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Early detection and assessment of intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a comprehensive review
        Acute Crit Care. 2023;38(4):409-424.   Published online November 30, 2023
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Figure
      We recommend

      ACC : Acute and Critical Care