Bleeding complications associated with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system: a retrospective study

Seon Woo Yoo; Min-Jong Ki; Dal Kim; Seul Ki Kim; SeungYong Park; Hyo Jin Han; Heung Bum Lee

doi:10.4266/acc.2021.00276

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Acute Crit Care > Volume 36(4); 2021 > Article

Original Article Bleeding complications associated with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system: a retrospective study: Seon Woo Yoo^1,2, Min-Jong Ki^1,2, Dal Kim¹, Seul Ki Kim^2,3, SeungYong Park^2,3,4, Hyo Jin Han^2,4, Heung Bum Lee^2,3,4; Acute and Critical Care 2021;36(4):322-331.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2021.00276
Published online: November 16, 2021

¹Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea

²Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea

³Humidifier Disinfectant Health Center, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea

⁴Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Research Center for Pulmonary Disorders, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea

Corresponding author: Heung Bum Lee Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Research Center for Pulmonary Disorders, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, 20 Geonji-ro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, 54907, Korea Tel: +82-63-250-1685, Fax: +82-63-254-1609, E-mail: lhbmd@jbnu.ac.kr

• Received: March 5, 2021 • Revised: July 2, 2021 • Accepted: August 25, 2021

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

5,366 Views
105 Download
3 Web of Science
4 Crossref
4 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
KEY MESSAGES
NOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES

Abstract

Background
The molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) is a hepatic replacement system that supports excretory liver function in patients with liver failure. However, since MARS has been employed in our hospital, bleeding complications have occurred in many patients during or after MARS. The objective of this study was to determine how MARS affects coagulopathy and identify specific factors associated with bleeding complications.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed data from 17 patients undergoing a total of 41 MARS sessions. Complete blood count, coagulation profiles, and blood chemistry values were compared before and after MARS. To identify pre-MARS factors associated with increased bleeding after MARS, we divided patients into bleeder and non-bleeder groups and compared their pre-MARS laboratory values.
Results
MARS significantly reduced bilirubin and creatinine levels. MARS also increased prothrombin time and reduced platelet and fibrinogen, thus negatively impacting coagulation. Pre-MARS hemoglobin was significantly lower in the bleeder group than in the non-bleeder group (P=0.015). When comparing the upper and lower 33% of MARS sessions based on the hemoglobin reduction rate, hemoglobin reduction was significantly greater in MARS sessions involving patients with low pre-MARS international normalized ratio of prothrombin time (PT-INR) and factor V (P=0.038 and P=0.023, respectively).
Conclusions
MARS could appears to alter coagulation-related factors such as factor V and increase the risk of bleeding complications particularly in patient with low hemoglobin. However, individual differences among patients were large, and various factors, such as low hemoglobin, PT-INR, and factor V levels, appear to be involved.
Key Words: artificial liver; blood coagulation disorders; end stage liver disease; extracorporeal life support; hemorrhage

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of liver failure encompasses symptomatic supportive care as a medical treatment and liver transplantation (LT) as a surgical treatment. The need for intensive critical care is based on the severity of symptoms, such as hemodynamic instability, encephalopathy, bleeding, and hepatorenal syndrome [1]. LT should be considered upon progression to decompensated liver failure [2]. However, as liver failure progresses rapidly and exhibits a varying course, it is difficult to make early decisions regarding LT in practice. In addition, finding living donors for LT is difficult, and obtaining appropriate cadaveric donors takes a considerable amount of time.

The molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) is a hepatic replacement system that supports excretory liver function in patients with liver failure. It is mainly used as a bridge therapy for patients waiting for LT [3,4]. MARS appears to improve bilirubinemia, hepatic encephalopathy, renal function, and systemic hemodynamics [5]. Although it may be a good option for patients with end-stage liver failure [6], many clinicians are reluctant to apply MARS due to its high price, various side effects, and lack of evidence that it reduces mortality and improves long-term survival rate [7-9]. Adverse effects of MARS include infection, hypotension, severe coagulopathy, bleeding, respiratory failure, cardiac failure, acute pancreatitis, severe thrombocytopenia, and seizure. Of these, bleeding complications are closely linked to mortality among liver failure patients [10], and even if donors are obtained, severe coagulopathy, such as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) can impose a major constraint on LT surgery.

Since MARS has been employed in our hospital, bleeding complications have occurred in many patients during or after MARS, even though coagulation-preventing agents, such as heparin or nafamostat, are not administered. One patient died of bleeding complications, and many others could not proceed with additional MARS sessions. However, other patients showed no bleeding-related complications. Therefore, we sought to determine which patients are more likely to experience bleeding complications and any predictive factors. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between MARS and bleeding complications, and to identify pre-MARS factors associated with bleeding complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Institutional Review Board of Jeonbuk National University Hospital approved this study (IRB No. CUH 2020-03-064). As the study is a retrospective observational one, the need for patient consent was waived.

Data Collection

Data from all patients receiving MARS in the intensive care unit (ICU) between December 2016 and February 2020 were analyzed retrospectively, which included 17 patients undergoing a total of 41 MARS sessions. Laboratory data, hospitalization records, progress records, ICU record sheets, nursing records, transfusion records, and medication history were reviewed. The following data were collected: patients' demographics; predisposing factors; pre-existing liver disease or bleeding; computed tomography abdomen and biopsy findings; Child-Turcotte-Pugh score, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) III, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score; use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT); need for mechanical ventilation and/or vasopressor support during MARS; timing and duration of MARS sessions; transfused blood units; pre-, on-, and post-MARS complete blood cell count, blood chemistry test, blood coagulation test, and coagulation factors; occurrence of LT; current patient status. Most pre- and post-MARS laboratory values were collected shortly before and after MARS, respectively. However, in cases of packed red blood cell (RBC) transfusion during MARS, some post-MARS laboratory values were replaced by on-MARS laboratory values to exclude the effect of transfusion. Coagulation factor values were obtained pre-MARS, 2 hours after the start of MARS, and post-MARS.

MARS Protocol

The main reason of MARS application in our cases are treatment of liver failure to enable native liver recovery, or as a bridge to LT. MARS treatment start in patients who has suitable liver transplant recipient with rapid deterioration of hepatic metabolic function, bilirubin ≥30 mg/dl and type 1 hepatorenal syndrome combined hepatic encephalopathy despite usual medical therapy and with or without acute or chronic liver disease. However, patients with active bleeding, a tendency to severe bleeding such as DIC and severe thrombocytopenia, or uncontrolled sepsis were excluded [6,11,12]. In addition, due to its very high cost, a comprehensive judgment was made considering factors such as the patient’s age, possibility of transplantation, and the opinions of the patient or guardians. Eight hours, at least more than 6 hours, of MARS sessions were repeated based on the daily assessment of the intensivist and medical and surgical hepatology specialists until the patient’s clinical condition improved.

The Baxter Gambro Mars kit was used, and heparin priming was performed. A Becton Dickinson arterial cannula was inserted into the brachial or radial artery, and an Arrow's You-Bend double-lumen hemodialysis (HD) catheter (12 Fr) for MARS and Arrow's multi-lumen central venous catheter (7 French, 3-lumen) were inserted into the right jugular, subclavian or femoral vein. HD catheter insertion was performed by radiologic intervention specialists under ultrasound and fluoroscopy to minimize the risk of bleeding as well as possible risks. No agent for preventing coagulation, such as heparin or nafamostat, was administered. Packed RBC, platelet concentrate (PC), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), fibrinogen, cryoprecipitate were transfused for suitable hemodynamics and preventing spontaneous bleeding. According to our medical ICU transfusion protocol, regardless of bleeding, blood products transfusions were performed with the target of hemoglobin ≥7–8 g/dl, platelet ≥ 30 ×10³/mm³–50×10³/mm³, prothrombin time and international normalized ratio (PT-INR) ≤2, and fibrinogen ≥150 mg/dl.

Data Analysis and Statistics Analysis

We first sought to determine the effect of MARS by comparing laboratory values before and after MARS. To identify pre-MARS factors associated with increased bleeding after MARS, we also divided patients into bleeder and non-bleeder groups, according to whether there was visually confirmed or strong suspicion of bleeding after MARS and compared their pre-MARS laboratory values. The bleeder group included patients with suddenly increased catheter insertion site hematoma or ecchymosis, hemoglobin reduction by ≥2 g/dl, need for RBC transfusion with two or more packs, or a marked increase in bleeding after MARS. The non-bleeder group consisted of patients not included in the bleeder group (i.e., patients without catheter insertion site hematoma or ecchymosis, hemoglobin reduction <2 g/dl after MARS, need for RBC transfusion with one or fewer packs, and no marked increase in any bleeding after MARS). We also compared the upper and lower 33% of MARS sessions based on the amount of hemoglobin reduction after MARS, which were designated as bleeding and non-bleeding sessions, respectively. Based on the results, potential factors associated with hemoglobin change rate were analyzed by multiple linear regression analysis.

Patient demographics and baseline values were compared using independent t-tests or chi-square test, as appropriate. Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests were used to determine whether data were normally distributed, after which groups were compared using independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney nonparametric tests. Changes over time in factors were tested using repeated measures analysis of variance. All statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS ver. 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

We examined data from 17 patients undergoing a total of 41 MARS sessions (Tables 1 and 2). The average age of patients was 50 years. Twelve were men, and five were women. Five patients had acute liver failure (ALF; 2 hepatitis A virus, 1 alcoholic, 1 pregnancy-induced, 1 toxic hepatitis), and 12 patients had acute-on-chronic liver failure (AoCLF; 9 alcoholic, 3 hepatitis B virus-related liver cirrhosis). MARS was administered one to six times per patient. At the time of MARS application, 13 of 17 patients were receiving either CRRT or HD, and one started CRRT after MARS was terminated. Ten of the 17 patients died, seven were on an outpatient follow-up. Seven patients underwent LT, one of them died 3 days after surgery and the other died 5 months after surgery. Ten patients did not received LT and two of them recovered spontaneously. Thus, two out of five patients with ALF died, two had native liver recovery, and one survived after LT. On the other hand, eight out of 12 patients with AoCLF died and four survived after LT. Forty MARS sessions were uninterrupted, but one MARS session was stopped after 1 hour due to malfunction of the blood leak detector. The average duration of MARS sessions was 8 hours and 18 minutes.

Eight of the 15 patients presented clinical bleeding complications during or after MARS and were classified into the bleeder group. Seven of these eight patients had catheter bleeding, and three had worsening ecchymosis. In two patient, hemoglobin decreased by <2 g/dl, and in two patients, more than two packs of RBCs were transfused. One patient exhibited subdural hematoma 3 days after MARS and eventually died. In addition, various bleeding events including oral bleeding, bloody sputum, hematuria, melena, or vaginal bleeding occurred or worsened in one or more patients. In patients in the bleeder group, hemoglobin decreased by 1.21 g/dl after MARS, and they received a daily average of 2.18 packs of RBCs, 7.20 packs of PC, 3.82 packs of FFP, and 5.02 packs of cryoprecipitate during the period receiving MARS (from the beginning of the initial MARS to the day following the end of the last MARS). The remaining nine out of 15 patients were classified into the non-bleeder group. Six patients exhibited little bleeding, and three had ecchymosis and catheter bleeding, but did not show much change after MARS. Hemoglobin before MARS decreased by 0.40 g/dl after MARS in the non-bleeder group. During the same period, patients in the non-bleeder group received a daily average of 0.54 packs of RBCs, 2.73 packs of PC, 2.77 packs of FFP, and 2.95 packs of cryoprecipitate.

The amount of change in laboratory values before and after MARS was compared across all patients (Table 3). We found significant changes before and after MARS in hemoglobin, platelet, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, creatinine, PT-INR, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen, fibrinogen degradation product (FDP), and D-dimer. Total bilirubin and direct bilirubin decreased from 33.0 and 19.5 mg/dl to 28.8 and 16.1 mg/dl though MARS (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). Creatinine decreased by 0.4 mg/dl from 1.8 mg/dl to 1.4 mg/dl (P<0.001). Changes in coagulation profiles after MARS were indicative of a negative coagulation effect. That is, PT-INR, aPTT, FDP, and D-dimer significantly increased, and platelet and fibrinogen significantly decreased after MARS. PT-INR and aPTT was 2.4 INR and 48.1 seconds before MARS but increased to 4.6 INR and 77.6 seconds after MARS (P=0.022 and P=0.017, respectively). Fibrinogen decreased from 155.4 mg/dl to 98.1 mg/dl (P=0.021), and platelet also decreased from 78.8 ×10³/mm³ to 63.5 ×10³/mm³ (P=0.002). These resulted in a decrease in hemoglobin from 9.4 g/dl to 8.8 g/dl (P<0.001). In addition, Figure 1 shows changes in coagulation factors measured before MARS, 2 hours after the start of MARS, and after MARS finish. There were no significant differences changes before and after MARS in other chemistry profiles, or inflammatory markers.

Table 2 presents pre-MARS values for patients in the bleeder and non-bleeder groups. Pre-MARS hemoglobin was significantly lower in the bleeder group (9.1 g/dl) than in the non-bleeder group (10.3 g/dl; P=0.015). Apart from hemoglobin, however, there were no significant differences between patient groups.

Table 4 shows a comparison of the upper and lower 33% of MARS sessions based on hemoglobin reduction rate. After MARS, hemoglobin decreased by 1.49 g/dl on average in the upper 33% of sessions (i.e., bleeding sessions) and increased by 0.15 g/dl in the lower 33% of sessions (i.e., non-bleeding sessions). Pre-MARS PT-INR was significantly higher for bleeding sessions (2.7 INR) than for non-bleeding sessions (2.0 INR; P=0.038). Also, pre-MARS factor V was significantly lower for bleeding sessions (24.8%) than for non-bleeding sessions (45.6%; P=0.023). Other values did not significantly differ between groups.

Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to verify the effect of pre-MARS factors potentially associated with hemoglobin change rate through MARS (Table 5). The results of verifying the significance of the regression coefficient show that pre-MARS hemoglobin, PT-INR, and factor V have a significant effect on the hemoglobin change rate, whereas pre-MARS platelet, total bilirubin, albumin, fibrinogen, and anti-thrombin do not. That is, the B value of the pre-MARS PT-INR was –5.227 (P=0.036), and as the pre-MARS PT-INR increased by 1 INR, the post-MARS hemoglobin decreased by 5.227%. The decrease of 1 g/dl hemoglobin and 1% factor V in pre-MARS can also be predicted to decrease post-MARS hemoglobin by 2.443% and 0.281%, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Our results show that MARS acts as a liver support system by reducing total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, and creatinine. However, MARS may increase the risk of bleeding by increasing PT and aPTT and reducing platelet and fibrinogen. As a result, hemoglobin levels decreased by 0.6 g/dl on average after MARS compared to before MARS. When comparing MARS sessions between two groups according to bleeding and hemoglobin change, parameters that differed significantly between two groups were pre-MARS hemoglobin, PT-INR, and factor V, and multiple linear regression analysis also indicates that these three factors are independently related to the hemoglobin change rate. This suggests that low hemoglobin, low factor V, and prolonged PT-INR in the blood test performed before MARS may have a high likelihood of bleeding complication.

Lower pre-MARS hemoglobin in the bleeding group suggests that bleeding, including micro-bleeding, may have been present prior to MARS, unless the patient had underlying anemia, chronic kidney disease, or hematological disease. There were no differences in pre-MARS parameters between bleeder and non-bleeder groups except for hemoglobin, and no patient had underlying chronic kidney disease. Thus, our results suggest that MARS increases bleeding risk when a tendency toward bleeding already exists. Pre-MARS platelet count, PT, and aPTT did not significantly differ between groups. As individual differences in bleeding tendency exist, laboratory values may not fully reflect a patient's bleeding tendency.

The liver is the site where fibrinogen and factors II, V, VII, IX, X, XI, and XII are synthesized. In patients with hepatic insufficiency, levels of these factors are low due to protein dysfunction and poor synthetic function. Defects in ℽ-carboxy-glutamic acid residues introduced by vitamin K-dependent carboxylase result in deterioration of the functions of factor II, VII, IX, and X and proteins C and S. By contrast, although factor V is mainly synthesized in the liver, it is a vitamin K-independent coagulation factor [13]. This may be the basis for the fact that the plasma half-life of factor V is relatively short, about 12–24 hours, and a decrease in factor V is the most sensitive indicator of liver failure [14,15]. Many studies also suggest that factor V levels are related to survival and can serve as a prognostic indicator [16-18]. Interestingly, the gene for factor V related to the family of multi-copper oxidases, and is homologous to coagulation factor VIII. Activated factor V (factor Va) is a major cofactor of the prothrombinase complex. The activated factor X enzyme requires calcium and factor Va to convert prothrombin to thrombin on the cell surface membrane. Factor Va is degraded by activated protein C, one of the principal physiological inhibitors of coagulation. In the presence of thrombomodulin, thrombin acts to decrease clotting by activating protein C; therefore, the concentration and action of protein C are important determinants in the negative feedback loop through which thrombin limits its own activation. Because this study was a simple retrospective observational study, we did not predict the association of factor V related-MARS complication and not check the protein C and von Willebrand factor. There is a limitation in studying additional associations such as protein C and other factors related to coagulation.

Many studies suggest that MARS reduces bilirubin and creatinine and improves hepatic encephalopathy [3]. However, its side effects such as bleeding complication and survival rate are somewhat controversial. A meta-analysis published in 2012 [5] reported that MARS reduced total bilirubin and clinical symptoms of hepatic encephalopathy, but had no effect on survival. In a meta-analysis published in 2019 [7], there was no difference in the survival of patients receiving standard medical support or MARS, but patients receiving high-intensity therapy with five or more MARS sessions showed better survival than those receiving low-intensity therapy with four or fewer sessions. They also found that the incidence of bleeding complications in the MARS group was 24.1% compared to 10.2% of patients receiving standard medical care (P=0.007). A meta-analysis published in 2020 [19] reports that MARS reduces mortality (relative risk [RR], 0.84; moderate certainty) among patients with ALF or AoCLF and is associated with bleeding-related side effects, such as hypotension (RR, 1.46; low certainty), bleeding (RR, 1.21; moderate certainty), and thrombocytopenia (RR, 1.62; very low certainty). Bleeding complications of MARS can induce an unstable hemodynamic state, increase blood transfusion demand, and impede the procedure [20,21]. Bleeding complications can also promote DIC in patients with liver failure, making medical staff hesitant to proceed with LT [10].

Many recent studies of MARS mention bleeding-associated side effects, such as thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy, hypofibrinogenemia, and anemia, but few studies focus on these outcomes. Among them, several studies using viscoelastic tests such as thromboelastography (TEG) or rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) indicate that MARS induces platelet-mediated coagulopathy, both mechanically and immunologically [22,23]. MARS is an extracorporeal circulation system that potentially activates coagulation by putting blood in contact with artificial materials, resulting in the consumption of coagulation factors and platelets. We found that MARS significantly reduced platelet count by 15.3 ×10³/mm³ and also reduced coagulation factors, especially factor V. Moreover, the large-bore venous cannulation (12 Fr) required for MARS may be a factor that causes bleeding in liver failure patients with coagulopathy. In this study, nine out of 17 patients (53%) had a bleeding complication, and eight out of nine patients (89%) had muscle or subcutaneous bleeding or hematoma related to catheter insertion. This differs significantly from the study in patients with ALF who received supportive care without MARS. The study found a 10.6% incidence of bleeding complications, of which 11% were procedure-related [10]. Double-lumen HD catheter (12Fr) and arterial line catheters were inserted in all patients so that bleeding tendency could be evaluated under the similar conditions. Unlike previous studies, we did not use heparin during MARS treatment and controlled the effects of blood transfusions such as packed RBCs, PC, and FFP.

Our study has several limitations. First, the number of patients was somewhat small, and the data collection period was long. Second, Due to its retrospective design, the time that laboratory testing was performed differed slightly across patients. Moreover, there was an inevitable difference in timing because we had to select two time points between which blood transfusion was not performed. Third, we cannot rule out the subjectivity of the researcher, as we grouped patients primarily based on their visible bleeding. The frequency of bleeding complications after MARS in our study was much higher than that in previous studies, even though heparin was not used. To explain this discrepancy, we reviewed the MARS procedure several times and contacted the MARS kit manufacturer to ensure that there were no changes in the kit or its recommended use instructions. Forth, as a retrospective study, viscoelastic tests such as TEG or ROTEM were not performed during the study period. These were not our routine practice.

In conclusion, MARS could appears to alter coagulation-related factors, such as platelet count, PT, aPTT, fibrinogen, and coagulation factors, and increase the tendency toward bleeding complications particularly in patients with low hemoglobin. Therefore, the progression of coagulopathy should be considered when proceeding with MARS. However, the differences observed among patients were large, and various factors, such as pre-MARS hemoglobin, PT-INR and factor V, appear to contribute to these differences. Further research on this subject is warranted given that the ability to predict bleeding complications, before their onset, would be useful to clinicians when making decisions regarding the use of MARS.

KEY MESSAGES

▪ Molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) is a liver support system that can be useful, but bleeding complication needs to be considered.

▪ MARS was found to cause significant coagulopathy, resulting in increased bleeding complication.

▪ Low hemoglobin, low factor V, and prolonged international normalized ratio of prothrombin time in the blood test performed before MARS may have a high likelihood of bleeding complication.

NOTES

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization: HBL. Data curation: DK, SKK. Formal analysis: HJH. Methodology: SYP. Project administration: MJK. Visualization: MJK. Writing–original draft: SWY. Writing–review & editing: MJK, HBL.

Acknowledgments

This paper was presented at the Acute and Critical Care Conference 2020 and was supported by Fund of Biomedical Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University Hospital.

We would like to thank the continuous renal replacement therapy nurse and medical intensive care unit nurses for their assistance with this study.

Figure 1.

Sequential measurements of coagulation factors (n=27). All factors (factor II, V, VII, and X) decreased significantly over time (P=0.012, P<0.001, P=0.001, and P=0.002, respectively). Note that factor V sharply decreased from 30.1% before molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) to 25.8% and 21.9%, respectively, 2 hours after MARS started and after MARS finished.

Table 1.

Patient’s data

No.	Gender/age (yr)	Predisposing factor	Reason for MARS	No. of MARS	New or increased bleeding sites at the time of MARS	LT	Final outcome
1	M/42	HAV	ALF complicated by HEP and renal dysfunction	3	No	Yes	Expire after 3 days of LT
2	M/47	Herb	ALF complicated by HEP and renal dysfunction	3	No	Yes	Outpatient FU
3	M/62	Alcohol	AoCLF complicated by progressive jaundice and renal dysfunction	3	Catheter insertion site hematoma	No	Expire
4	M/64	Alcohol	AoCLF complicated by progressive jaundice and renal dysfunction	2	No	No	Expire
5	F/28	Pregnancy	ALF complicated by renal dysfunction	1	Vaginal bleeding, catheter insertion site hematoma	No	Outpatient FU
6	M/42	Alcohol, GI bleeding	AoCLF complicated by HEP and renal dysfunction	1	GI bleeding, catheter insertion site hematoma	No	Expire
7	F/51	HBV	AoCLF complicated by progressive jaundice and renal dysfunction	2	Catheter insertion site hematoma	Yes	Outpatient FU, HD
8	M/62	Drug, HBV	AoCLF complicated by progressive jaundice and renal dysfunction	2	No	Yes	Outpatient FU, HD
9	F/35	HAV	ALF complicated by HEP	2	No	No	Outpatient FU
10	F/62	Alcohol	AoCLF complicated by progressive jaundice	2	Brain subdural hemorrhage	No	Expire
11	M/48	Alcohol	AoCLF complicated by progressive jaundice	1	Oral bleeding, catheter insertion site hematoma	Yes	Outpatient FU
12	M/59	HBV	AoCLF complicated by progressive jaundice and renal dysfunction	6	No	Yes	Outpatient FU, HD
13	M/66	Alcohol	AoCLF complicated by progressive jaundice	2	Catheter insertion site hematoma	No	Expire
14	F/26	Alcohol	AoCLF complicated by progressive jaundice	3	No	Yes	Expire after 5 months of LT
15	M/35	Alcohol, GI bleeding	AoCLF complicated by HEP, progressive jaundice, and renal dysfunction	3	No	No	Expire
16	M/42	HBV	AoCLF complicated by HEP, progressive jaundice	2	No	No	Expire
17	M/49	Alcohol, herb	ALF complicated by HEP, progressive jaundice	3	Catheter insertion site hematoma	No	Expire

MARS: molecular adsorbent recirculating system; LT: liver transplantation; HAV: hepatitis A virus; ALF: acute liver failure; HEP: hepatic encephalopathy; FU: follow-up; AoCLF: acute-on-chronic liver failure; GI: gastro-intestinal; HBV: hepatitis B virus; HD: hemodialysis.

Table 2.

Patient’s baseline values before molecular adsorbent recirculating system

Variable	All patients (n=17)	Bleeder (n=8)	Non-bleeder (n=9)	P-value
Male	12 (70.6)	5 (62.5)	7 (77.8)	0.490
Age (yr)	50.0±13.9	51.3±13.5	46.3±14.2	0.673
Underlying liver cirrhosis	12 (70.6)	6 (75.0)	6 (66.7)	0.707
End stage renal disease	0	0	0	1.000
Disease severity
CTP score	10.9±1.4	10.8±1.4	11.0±1.6	0.888
MELD score	38.5±6.8	39.9±5.7	37.3±7.9	0.481
SAPS III score	62.3±10.0	63.0±10.7	61.7±10.0	1.000
APACHE II score	16.1±6.9	17.5±7.3	14.9±6.6	0.481
Support modality
CRRT	13 (76.5)	7 (87.5)	6 (66.7)	0.312
Mechanical ventilation	4 (23.5)	3 (37.5)	1 (11.1)	0.079
Vasopressor	6 (35.3)	4 (50.0)	2 (22.2)	0.079
Laboratory parameter
Hemoglobin (g/dl)	9.7±2.1	9.1±2.4	10.3±1.6	0.015
Platelet (×10³/mm³)	77.4±46.2	84.6±55.6	70.9±38.2	0.606
AST (IU/L)	673±1,360	352±635	958±1,776	0.200
ALT (IU/L)	600±1045	359±678	814±1,293	0.200
Total bilirubin (mg/dl)	30.9±12.7	30.2±11.7	31.5±14.3	0.743
Direct bilirubin (mg/dl)	18.8±8.9	15.4±5.9	21.7±10.4	0.139
Albumin (g/dl)	3.2±0.3	3.3±0.3	3.2±0.3	0.236
Creatinine (mg/dl)	1.9±1.1	1.7±0.4	2.1±1.5	0.673
Ammonia (µmol/L)	89.7±46.9	91.5±61.8	88.2±32.6	0.541
LD (IU/l)	1,491±1,692	1,316±1,348	1,647±2,019	0.673
PT-INR	2.5±0.8	2.7±1.0	2.3±0.4	0.606
aPTT (sec)	48.0±10.9	46.1±7.4	49.8±13.6	0.963
Fibrinogen (mg/dl)	151.7±51.6	133.9±56.4	169.5±42.4	0.161
FDP (mg/ml)	62.0±58.4	69.4±55.7	53.5±64.6	0.613
Anti-thrombin Ⅲ (%)	28.0±14.5	25.6±13.7	30.4±15.9	0.645
D-dimer (mg/L FEU)	15.3±15.7	14.9±13.2	15.9±19.3	0.955
Factor Ⅱ (%)	31.5±7.9	31.3±6.9	31.7±9.1	1.000
Factor V (%)	27.4±16.9	16.0±7.7	35.0±17.4	0.067
Factor Ⅶ (%)	19.1±7.8	17.5±9.8	20.2±6.9	0.914
Factor X (%)	39.8±15.4	35.5±11.1	42.7±18.2	1.000
Procalcitonin (ng/ml)	2.0±1.9	1.3±0.8	2.6±2.4	0.321
Lactate (mmol/L)	3.2±2.0	3.3±2.5	3.0±1.6	0.673

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.

CTP: Child-Turcotte-Pugh; MELD: model for end-stage liver disease; SAPS: Simplified Acute Physiology Score; APACHE: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; CRRT: continuous renal replacement therapy; AST: aspartate transaminase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; LD: lactate dehydrogenase; PT-INR: international normalized ratio of prothrombin time; aPTT: activated partial thromboplastin time; FDP: fibrinogen degradation product; FEU: fibrinogen equivalent unit.

Table 3.

Changes in values before and after MARS (n=41)

Variable	Before MARS	After MARS	P-value
Complete blood count
Hemoglobin (g/dl)	9.4±1.7	8.8±1.8	<0.001^a
Platelet (×10³/mm³)	78.8±35.2	63.5±35.1	0.002
Chemistry profile
AST (IU/L)	444±924	389±654	0.586
ALT (IU/L)	470±836	422±713	0.126
Total bilirubin (mg/dl)	33.0±11.6	28.8±9.0	<0.001
Direct bilirubin (mg/dl)	19.5±7.7	16.1±5.7	<0.001
Albumin (g/dl)	3.3±0.4	3.4±0.5	0.119
Creatinine (mg/dl)	1.8±1.0	1.4±0.7	<0.001
Ammonia (µmol/L)	92.2±52.5	87.6±45.7	0.133
LD (IU/L)	1,320±1,157	1,266±787	0.728
Coagulation profile
PT-INR	2.4±0.8	4.6±6.0	0.022
aPTT (sec)	48.1±14.2	77.6±76.4	0.017
Fibrinogen (mg/dl)	155.4±28.1	98.1±64.1	<0.001
FDP (mg/ml)	107±107	189±121	<0.001
Anti-thrombin Ⅲ (%)	30.6±13.6	34.4±13.2	0.141
D-dimer (mg/L FEU)	34.2±44.8	66.6±53.6	<0.001
Coagulation factor
Factor Ⅱ (%)	34.7±9.3	32.0±10.6	0.014
Factor Ⅴ (%)	30.1±17.6	21.9±17.1	<0.001
Factor Ⅶ (%)	21.2±9.8	19.7±9.3	0.008
Factor Ⅹ (%)	44.4±16.0	41.4±16.3	0.003

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

MARS: molecular adsorbent recirculating system; AST: aspartate transaminase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; LD: lactate dehydrogenase; PT-INR: international normalized ratio of prothrombin time; aPTT: activated partial thromboplastin time; FDP: fibrinogen degradation product; FEU: fibrinogen equivalent unit.

Table 4.

Pre-MARS values for bleeding and non-bleeding sessions based on rate of hemoglobin decrease during MARS

Variable	Bleeding sessions (n=14)	Non-bleeding sessions (n=13)	P-value
Support modality
CRRT	11 (78.6)	9 (69.2)	0.685
Mechanical ventilation	4 (28.6)	1 (7.7)	0.375
Vasopressor	4 (28.6)	1 (7.7)	0.375
Complete blood count
Hemoglobin (g/dl)	9.4±2.2	10.1±1.5	0.054
Platelet (×10³/mm³)	87.2±41.3	89.7±30.4	0.616
Laboratory parameter
AST (IU/L)	347±499	857±1506	0.519
ALT (IU/L)	350±599	986±1213	0.239
Total bilirubin (mg/dl)	34.1±11.1	25.1±13.3	0.066
Direct bilirubin (mg/dl)	19.6±7.7	16.7±9.1	0.379
Albumin (g/dl)	3.3±0.4	3.4±0.4	0.820
Creatinine (mg/dl)	1.8±0.9	1.5±0.8	0.759
Ammonia (µmol/L)	95.5±72.0	96.0±40.9	0.350
LD (IU/L)	1,265±1,088	1,534±1,690	0.943
Coagulation profile
PT-INR	2.7±1.1	2.0±0.3	0.038
aPTT (sec)	46.4±5.8	45.5±13.5	0.141
Fibrinogen (mg/dl)	163±84	159±43	0.859
FDP (mg/ml)	106.9±106.8	98.4±98.7	0.810
Anti-thrombin Ⅲ (%)	26.6±12.4	26.4±7.7	0.955
D-dimer (mg/L FEU)	32.1±45.6	32.3±39.5	0.689
Coagulation factor
Factor Ⅱ (%)	33.5±8.8	39.6±10.8	0.270
Factor Ⅴ (%)	24.8±16.8	45.6±21.2	0.023
Factor Ⅶ (%)	19.3±9.2	25.0±8.3	0.222
Factor Ⅹ (%)	41.5±15.2	52.3±18.9	0.212

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.

MARS: molecular adsorbent recirculating system; CRRT: continuous renal replacement therapy; AST: aspartate transaminase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; LD: lactate dehydrogenase; PT-INR: international normalized ratio of prothrombin time; aPTT: activated partial thromboplastin time; FDP: fibrinogen degradation product; FEU: fibrinogen equivalent unit.

Table 5.

Multiple linear regression analysis of pre-MARS factors potentially associated with hemoglobin change rate (%)

Independent variable	Unstandardized coefficient		Standardized coefficient	P
Independent variable	B	SE	β	P
Hemoglobin (g/dl)	2.443	0.994	0.460	0.020
Platelet (×10³/mm³)	–0.072	0.046	–0.281	0.132
Total bilirubin (mg/dl)	0.153	0.157	0.198	0.338
Albumin (g/dl)	6.657	3.948	0.280	0.101
PT (INR)	–5.227	2.389	–0.462	0.036
Fibrinogen (mg/dl)	–0.030	0.027	–0.185	0.284
Anti-thrombin Ⅲ (%)	–0.132	0.102	–0.199	0.206
Factor V (%)	0.281	0.125	0.434	0.032

F=2.582 (P=0.027), _adjR²=0.240, Durbin-Watson=2.154.

MARS: molecular adsorbent recirculating system; SE: standard error; PT-INR: international normalized ratio of prothrombin time.

REFERENCES

1. Nanchal R, Subramanian R, Karvellas CJ, Hollenberg SM, Peppard WJ, Singbartl K, et al. Guidelines for the management of adult acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure in the ICU: cardiovascular, endocrine, hematologic, pulmonary and renal considerations: executive summary. Crit Care Med 2020;48:415-9.Article PubMed
2. Lim YS. Acute liver failure in Korea: etiology, prognosis and treatment. Korean J Hepatol 2010;16:5-18.Article PubMed
3. Gerth HU, Pohlen M, Thölking G, Pavenstädt H, Brand M, Hüsing-Kabar A, et al. Molecular adsorbent recirculating system can reduce short-term mortality among patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure-a retrospective analysis. Crit Care Med 2017;45:1616-24.Article PubMed PMC
4. Choi JW, Yoon KT, Park JY, Kim JK, Ahn SH, Paik YH, et al. Usefulness and safety of extracorporeal liver support therapy using MARSR for patients with liver failure: a preliminary report. Korean J Gastroenterol 2009;54:28-35.Article PubMed
5. Vaid A, Chweich H, Balk EM, Jaber BL. Molecular adsorbent recirculating system as artificial support therapy for liver failure: a meta-analysis. ASAIO J 2012;58:51-9.PubMed
6. Saliba F. The Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) in the intensive care unit: a rescue therapy for patients with hepatic failure. Crit Care 2006;10:118. Article PubMed PMC
7. Bañares R, Ibáñez-Samaniego L, Torner JM, Pavesi M, Olmedo C, Catalina MV, et al. Meta-analysis of individual patient data of albumin dialysis in acute-on-chronic liver failure: focus on treatment intensity. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2019;12:1756284819879565. Article PubMed PMC
8. He GL, Feng L, Duan CY, Hu X, Zhou CJ, Cheng Y, et al. Meta-analysis of survival with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system for liver failure. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8:17046-54.PubMed PMC
9. Khuroo MS, Khuroo MS, Farahat KL. Molecular adsorbent recirculating system for acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure: a meta-analysis. Liver Transpl 2004;10:1099-106.Article PubMed
10. Stravitz RT, Ellerbe C, Durkalski V, Schilsky M, Fontana RJ, Peterseim C, et al. Bleeding complications in acute liver failure. Hepatology 2018;67:1931-42.Article PubMed
11. Boyle M, Kurtovic J, Bihari D, Riordan S, Steiner C. Equipment review: the molecular adsorbents recirculating system (MARS). Crit Care 2004;8:280-6.Article PubMed PMC
12. Jalan R, Sen S, Williams R. Prospects for extracorporeal liver support. Gut 2004;53:890-8.Article PubMed PMC
13. Duga S, Asselta R, Tenchini ML. Coagulation factor V. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2004;36:1393-9.Article PubMed
14. Izumi S, Langley PG, Wendon J, Ellis AJ, Pernambuco RB, Hughes RD, et al. Coagulation factor V levels as a prognostic indicator in fulminant hepatic failure. Hepatology 1996;23:1507-11.Article PubMed
15. Bernuau J, Goudeau A, Poynard T, Dubois F, Lesage G, Yvonnet B, et al. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in fulminant hepatitis B. Hepatology 1986;6:648-51.Article PubMed
16. Ichai P, Laurent-Bellue A, Saliba F, Moreau D, Besch C, Francoz C, et al. Acute liver failure/injury related to drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms: outcomes and prognostic factors. Transplantation 2017;101:1830-7.PubMed
17. Zulian MC, Chedid MF, Chedid AD, Grezzana Filho TJ, Leipnitz I, de Araujo A, et al. Low serum factor V level: early predictor of allograft failure and death following liver transplantation. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2015;400:589-97.Article PubMed
18. Elinav E, Ben-Dov I, Hai-Am E, Ackerman Z, Ofran Y. The predictive value of admission and follow up factor V and VII levels in patients with acute hepatitis and coagulopathy. J Hepatol 2005;42:82-6.Article PubMed
19. Alshamsi F, Alshammari K, Belley-Cote E, Dionne J, Albrahim T, Albudoor B, et al. Extracorporeal liver support in patients with liver failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Intensive Care Med 2020;46:1-16.Article
20. Kim Y, Kim CK, Jung S, Ko SB. Brain oxygen monitoring via jugular venous oxygen saturation in a patient with fulminant hepatic failure. Korean J Crit Care Med 2016;31:251-5.Article
21. Ha SJ, Hwang YJ, Lim DG. Hemodynamic changes during isolated liver hemoperfusion of hepatoma. Korean J Crit Care Med 2004;19:115-20.
22. Faybik P, Bacher A, Kozek-Langenecker SA, Steltzer H, Krenn CG, Unger S, et al. Molecular adsorbent recirculating system and hemostasis in patients at high risk of bleeding: an observational study. Crit Care 2006;10:R24. Article PubMed PMC
23. Doria C, Mandalà L, Smith JD, Caruana G, Scott VL, Gruttadauria S, et al. Thromboelastography used to assess coagulation during treatment with molecular adsorbent recirculating system. Clin Transplant 2004;18:365-71.Article PubMed

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Fractionated plasma separation and adsorption integrated with continuous veno‐venous hemofiltration in patients with acute liver failure: A single center experience from China
Jianhua Dong, Li Huang, Chuan Li, Bian Wu, Xi Yang, Yongchun Ge
Journal of Clinical Apheresis.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Crosslinked Bifunctional Particles for the Removal of Bilirubin in Hyperbilirubinemia Cases
María del Prado Garrido, Ana Maria Borreguero, Maria Jesús Ramos, Manuel Carmona, Francisco Javier Redondo Calvo, Juan Francisco Rodriguez
Materials.2023; 16(8): 2999. CrossRef
The Effect of Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System in Patients With Liver Failure: A Case Series of 44 Patients
Shahin Isha, Anna S. Jenkins, Abby J. Hanson, Parthkumar H. Satashia, Sai Abhishek Narra, Gunjan D. Mundhra, Mohammed Mustafa Hasan, Ashrita Donepudi, Abishek Giri, Patrick W. Johnson, Dolores Villar, Christan Santos, Juan Canabal, Philip Lowman, Pablo Mo
Transplantation Proceedings.2023; 55(9): 2126. CrossRef
Extracorporeal organ support and the kidney
Maria-Jimena Muciño-Bermejo
Frontiers in Nephrology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Bleeding complications associated with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system: a retrospective study

Acute Crit Care. 2021;36(4):322-331. Published online November 16, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2021.00276

XML Download

Figure

Bleeding complications associated with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system: a retrospective study

Figure 1. Sequential measurements of coagulation factors (n=27). All factors (factor II, V, VII, and X) decreased significantly over time (P=0.012, P<0.001, P=0.001, and P=0.002, respectively). Note that factor V sharply decreased from 30.1% before molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) to 25.8% and 21.9%, respectively, 2 hours after MARS started and after MARS finished.

Figure 1.

Bleeding complications associated with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system: a retrospective study

No.	Gender/age (yr)	Predisposing factor	Reason for MARS	No. of MARS	New or increased bleeding sites at the time of MARS	LT	Final outcome
1	M/42	HAV	ALF complicated by HEP and renal dysfunction	3	No	Yes	Expire after 3 days of LT
2	M/47	Herb	ALF complicated by HEP and renal dysfunction	3	No	Yes	Outpatient FU
3	M/62	Alcohol	AoCLF complicated by progressive jaundice and renal dysfunction	3	Catheter insertion site hematoma	No	Expire
4	M/64	Alcohol	AoCLF complicated by progressive jaundice and renal dysfunction	2	No	No	Expire
5	F/28	Pregnancy	ALF complicated by renal dysfunction	1	Vaginal bleeding, catheter insertion site hematoma	No	Outpatient FU
6	M/42	Alcohol, GI bleeding	AoCLF complicated by HEP and renal dysfunction	1	GI bleeding, catheter insertion site hematoma	No	Expire
7	F/51	HBV	AoCLF complicated by progressive jaundice and renal dysfunction	2	Catheter insertion site hematoma	Yes	Outpatient FU, HD
8	M/62	Drug, HBV	AoCLF complicated by progressive jaundice and renal dysfunction	2	No	Yes	Outpatient FU, HD
9	F/35	HAV	ALF complicated by HEP	2	No	No	Outpatient FU
10	F/62	Alcohol	AoCLF complicated by progressive jaundice	2	Brain subdural hemorrhage	No	Expire
11	M/48	Alcohol	AoCLF complicated by progressive jaundice	1	Oral bleeding, catheter insertion site hematoma	Yes	Outpatient FU
12	M/59	HBV	AoCLF complicated by progressive jaundice and renal dysfunction	6	No	Yes	Outpatient FU, HD
13	M/66	Alcohol	AoCLF complicated by progressive jaundice	2	Catheter insertion site hematoma	No	Expire
14	F/26	Alcohol	AoCLF complicated by progressive jaundice	3	No	Yes	Expire after 5 months of LT
15	M/35	Alcohol, GI bleeding	AoCLF complicated by HEP, progressive jaundice, and renal dysfunction	3	No	No	Expire
16	M/42	HBV	AoCLF complicated by HEP, progressive jaundice	2	No	No	Expire
17	M/49	Alcohol, herb	ALF complicated by HEP, progressive jaundice	3	Catheter insertion site hematoma	No	Expire

Variable	All patients (n=17)	Bleeder (n=8)	Non-bleeder (n=9)	P-value
Male	12 (70.6)	5 (62.5)	7 (77.8)	0.490
Age (yr)	50.0±13.9	51.3±13.5	46.3±14.2	0.673
Underlying liver cirrhosis	12 (70.6)	6 (75.0)	6 (66.7)	0.707
End stage renal disease	0	0	0	1.000
Disease severity
CTP score	10.9±1.4	10.8±1.4	11.0±1.6	0.888
MELD score	38.5±6.8	39.9±5.7	37.3±7.9	0.481
SAPS III score	62.3±10.0	63.0±10.7	61.7±10.0	1.000
APACHE II score	16.1±6.9	17.5±7.3	14.9±6.6	0.481
Support modality
CRRT	13 (76.5)	7 (87.5)	6 (66.7)	0.312
Mechanical ventilation	4 (23.5)	3 (37.5)	1 (11.1)	0.079
Vasopressor	6 (35.3)	4 (50.0)	2 (22.2)	0.079
Laboratory parameter
Hemoglobin (g/dl)	9.7±2.1	9.1±2.4	10.3±1.6	0.015
Platelet (×10³/mm³)	77.4±46.2	84.6±55.6	70.9±38.2	0.606
AST (IU/L)	673±1,360	352±635	958±1,776	0.200
ALT (IU/L)	600±1045	359±678	814±1,293	0.200
Total bilirubin (mg/dl)	30.9±12.7	30.2±11.7	31.5±14.3	0.743
Direct bilirubin (mg/dl)	18.8±8.9	15.4±5.9	21.7±10.4	0.139
Albumin (g/dl)	3.2±0.3	3.3±0.3	3.2±0.3	0.236
Creatinine (mg/dl)	1.9±1.1	1.7±0.4	2.1±1.5	0.673
Ammonia (µmol/L)	89.7±46.9	91.5±61.8	88.2±32.6	0.541
LD (IU/l)	1,491±1,692	1,316±1,348	1,647±2,019	0.673
PT-INR	2.5±0.8	2.7±1.0	2.3±0.4	0.606
aPTT (sec)	48.0±10.9	46.1±7.4	49.8±13.6	0.963
Fibrinogen (mg/dl)	151.7±51.6	133.9±56.4	169.5±42.4	0.161
FDP (mg/ml)	62.0±58.4	69.4±55.7	53.5±64.6	0.613
Anti-thrombin Ⅲ (%)	28.0±14.5	25.6±13.7	30.4±15.9	0.645
D-dimer (mg/L FEU)	15.3±15.7	14.9±13.2	15.9±19.3	0.955
Factor Ⅱ (%)	31.5±7.9	31.3±6.9	31.7±9.1	1.000
Factor V (%)	27.4±16.9	16.0±7.7	35.0±17.4	0.067
Factor Ⅶ (%)	19.1±7.8	17.5±9.8	20.2±6.9	0.914
Factor X (%)	39.8±15.4	35.5±11.1	42.7±18.2	1.000
Procalcitonin (ng/ml)	2.0±1.9	1.3±0.8	2.6±2.4	0.321
Lactate (mmol/L)	3.2±2.0	3.3±2.5	3.0±1.6	0.673

Variable	Before MARS	After MARS	P-value
Complete blood count
Hemoglobin (g/dl)	9.4±1.7	8.8±1.8	<0.001^a
Platelet (×10³/mm³)	78.8±35.2	63.5±35.1	0.002
Chemistry profile
AST (IU/L)	444±924	389±654	0.586
ALT (IU/L)	470±836	422±713	0.126
Total bilirubin (mg/dl)	33.0±11.6	28.8±9.0	<0.001
Direct bilirubin (mg/dl)	19.5±7.7	16.1±5.7	<0.001
Albumin (g/dl)	3.3±0.4	3.4±0.5	0.119
Creatinine (mg/dl)	1.8±1.0	1.4±0.7	<0.001
Ammonia (µmol/L)	92.2±52.5	87.6±45.7	0.133
LD (IU/L)	1,320±1,157	1,266±787	0.728
Coagulation profile
PT-INR	2.4±0.8	4.6±6.0	0.022
aPTT (sec)	48.1±14.2	77.6±76.4	0.017
Fibrinogen (mg/dl)	155.4±28.1	98.1±64.1	<0.001
FDP (mg/ml)	107±107	189±121	<0.001
Anti-thrombin Ⅲ (%)	30.6±13.6	34.4±13.2	0.141
D-dimer (mg/L FEU)	34.2±44.8	66.6±53.6	<0.001
Coagulation factor
Factor Ⅱ (%)	34.7±9.3	32.0±10.6	0.014
Factor Ⅴ (%)	30.1±17.6	21.9±17.1	<0.001
Factor Ⅶ (%)	21.2±9.8	19.7±9.3	0.008
Factor Ⅹ (%)	44.4±16.0	41.4±16.3	0.003

Variable	Bleeding sessions (n=14)	Non-bleeding sessions (n=13)	P-value
Support modality
CRRT	11 (78.6)	9 (69.2)	0.685
Mechanical ventilation	4 (28.6)	1 (7.7)	0.375
Vasopressor	4 (28.6)	1 (7.7)	0.375
Complete blood count
Hemoglobin (g/dl)	9.4±2.2	10.1±1.5	0.054
Platelet (×10³/mm³)	87.2±41.3	89.7±30.4	0.616
Laboratory parameter
AST (IU/L)	347±499	857±1506	0.519
ALT (IU/L)	350±599	986±1213	0.239
Total bilirubin (mg/dl)	34.1±11.1	25.1±13.3	0.066
Direct bilirubin (mg/dl)	19.6±7.7	16.7±9.1	0.379
Albumin (g/dl)	3.3±0.4	3.4±0.4	0.820
Creatinine (mg/dl)	1.8±0.9	1.5±0.8	0.759
Ammonia (µmol/L)	95.5±72.0	96.0±40.9	0.350
LD (IU/L)	1,265±1,088	1,534±1,690	0.943
Coagulation profile
PT-INR	2.7±1.1	2.0±0.3	0.038
aPTT (sec)	46.4±5.8	45.5±13.5	0.141
Fibrinogen (mg/dl)	163±84	159±43	0.859
FDP (mg/ml)	106.9±106.8	98.4±98.7	0.810
Anti-thrombin Ⅲ (%)	26.6±12.4	26.4±7.7	0.955
D-dimer (mg/L FEU)	32.1±45.6	32.3±39.5	0.689
Coagulation factor
Factor Ⅱ (%)	33.5±8.8	39.6±10.8	0.270
Factor Ⅴ (%)	24.8±16.8	45.6±21.2	0.023
Factor Ⅶ (%)	19.3±9.2	25.0±8.3	0.222
Factor Ⅹ (%)	41.5±15.2	52.3±18.9	0.212

Independent variable	Unstandardized coefficient		Standardized coefficient	P
Independent variable	B	SE	β	P
Hemoglobin (g/dl)	2.443	0.994	0.460	0.020
Platelet (×10³/mm³)	–0.072	0.046	–0.281	0.132
Total bilirubin (mg/dl)	0.153	0.157	0.198	0.338
Albumin (g/dl)	6.657	3.948	0.280	0.101
PT (INR)	–5.227	2.389	–0.462	0.036
Fibrinogen (mg/dl)	–0.030	0.027	–0.185	0.284
Anti-thrombin Ⅲ (%)	–0.132	0.102	–0.199	0.206
Factor V (%)	0.281	0.125	0.434	0.032

Table 1. Patient’s data

Table 2. Patient’s baseline values before molecular adsorbent recirculating system

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.

Table 3. Changes in values before and after MARS (n=41)

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

Table 4. Pre-MARS values for bleeding and non-bleeding sessions based on rate of hemoglobin decrease during MARS

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.

Table 5. Multiple linear regression analysis of pre-MARS factors potentially associated with hemoglobin change rate (%)

F=2.582 (P=0.027), _adjR²=0.240, Durbin-Watson=2.154.

MARS: molecular adsorbent recirculating system; SE: standard error; PT-INR: international normalized ratio of prothrombin time.