Acute and Critical Care

Review Article

Basic science and research
Barriers and facilitators in the provision of palliative care in adult intensive care units: a scoping review: Christantie Effendy, Yodang Yodang, Sarah Amalia, Erna Rochmawati; Acute Crit Care. 2022;37(4):516-526. Published online October 18, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2022.00745

4,176 View
330 Download
2 Web of Science
4 Crossref

The provision of palliative care in the intensive care unit (ICU) is increasing. While some scholars have suggested the goals of palliative care to not be aligned with the ICU, some evidence show benefits of the integration. This review aimed to explore and synthesize research that identified barriers and facilitators in the provision of palliative care in the ICU. This review utilized Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review guidelines based on population, concept, and context. We searched for eligible studies in five electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, Science Direct, and Sage) and included studies on the provision of palliative care (concept) in the ICU (context) that were published in English between 2005–2021. We describe the provision of palliative care in terms of barriers and facilitators. We also describe the study design and context. A total of 14 papers was included. Several barriers and facilitators in providing palliative care in the ICU were identified and include lack of capabilities, family boundaries, practical issues, cultural differences. Facilitators of the provision of palliative care in an ICU include greater experience and supportive behaviors, i.e., collaborations between health care professionals. This scoping review demonstrates the breadth of barriers and facilitators of palliative care in the ICU. Hospital management can consider findings of the current review to better integrate palliative care in the ICU.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

A necessidade dos cuidados paliativos na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva (UTI)
Larissa Kênia de Oliveira Barros Dos Santos, Isabella Rodrigues Ribeiro, João Pedro Manduca Ferreira, Victor Hugo Oliveira Moraes, Érika Aguiar Lara Pereira
Cuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
End-of-life Care in the Intensive Care Unit and Ethics of Withholding/Withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatments
Andrea Cortegiani, Mariachiara Ippolito, Sebastiano Mercadante
Anesthesiology Clinics.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
What helps or hinders effective end-of-life care in adult intensive care units in Middle Eastern countries? A systematic review
Nabat Almalki, Breidge Boyle, Peter O’Halloran
BMC Palliative Care.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Healthcare Professionals’ Attitudes towards and Knowledge and Understanding of Paediatric Palliative Medicine (PPM) and Its Meaning within the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU): A Summative Content Analysis in a Tertiary Children’s Hospital in Scotlan
Satyajit Ray, Emma Victoria McLorie, Jonathan Downie
Healthcare.2023; 11(17): 2438. CrossRef

Original Articles

Ethics
Decision-making regarding withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment and the role of intensivists in the intensive care unit: a single-center study: Seo In Lee, Kyung Sook Hong, Jin Park, Young-Joo Lee; Acute Crit Care. 2020;35(3):179-188. Published online August 10, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2020.00136

6,477 View
206 Download
8 Web of Science
6 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Background
This study examined the experience of withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in patients hospitalized in the intensive care units (ICUs) of a tertiary care center. It also considers the role that intensivists play in the decision-making process regarding the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 227 patients who decided to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment while hospitalized at Ewha Womans University Medical Center Mokdong between April 9 and December 31, 2018.
Results
The 227 hospitalized patients included in the analysis withheld or withdrew from life-sustaining treatment. The department in which life-sustaining treatment was withheld or withdrawn most frequently was hemato-oncology (26.4%). Among these patients, the most common diagnosis was gastrointestinal tract cancer (29.1%). A majority of patients (64.3%) chose not to receive any life-sustaining treatment. Of the 80 patients in the ICU, intensivists participated in the decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment in 34 cases. There were higher proportions of treatment withdrawal and ICU-to-ward transfers among the cases in whom intensivists participated in decision making compared to those cases in whom intensivists did not participate (50.0% vs. 4.3% and 52.9% vs. 19.6%, respectively).
Conclusions
Through their participation in end-of-life discussions, intensivists can help patients’ families to make decisions about withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment and possibly avoiding futile treatments for these patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with do-not-resuscitate and physician orders for life-sustaining treatment in a medical intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study
Song-I Lee, Ye-Rin Ju, Da Hyun Kang, Jeong Eun Lee
BMC Palliative Care.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of the end-of-life decisions of patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia after the enforcement of the life-sustaining treatment decision act in Korea
Ae-Rin Baek, Sang-Bum Hong, Soohyun Bae, Hye Kyeong Park, Changhwan Kim, Hyun-Kyung Lee, Woo Hyun Cho, Jin Hyoung Kim, Youjin Chang, Heung Bum Lee, Hyun-Il Gil, Beomsu Shin, Kwang Ha Yoo, Jae Young Moon, Jee Youn Oh, Kyung Hoon Min, Kyeongman Jeon, Moon S
BMC Medical Ethics.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Dying in the ICU
Isabel Schulmeyer, Markus A. Weigand, Monika Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, Marco Gruss
Die Anaesthesiologie.2022; 71(12): 930. CrossRef
Changes in the incidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before and after implementation of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act
Hyunjae Im, Hyun Woo Choe, Seung-Young Oh, Ho Geol Ryu, Hannah Lee
Acute and Critical Care.2022; 37(2): 237. CrossRef
Factors Influencing the Initiative Behavior of Intensive Care Unit Nurses toward End-of-Life Decision Making: A Cross-Sectional Study
Jingying Huang, Haiou Qi, Yiting Zhu, Minyan Zhang
Journal of Palliative Medicine.2022; 25(12): 1802. CrossRef
Analysis of high-intensity care in intensive care units and its cost at the end of life among older people in South Korea between 2016 and 2019: a cross-sectional study of the health insurance review and assessment service national patient sample database
Yunji Lee, Minjeong Jo, Taehwa Kim, Kyoungsun Yun
BMJ Open.2021; 11(8): e049711. CrossRef

Ethics
The Current Status of Medical Decision-Making for Dying Patients in a Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Center Study: Kyunghwa Shin, Jeong Ha Mok, Sang Hee Lee, Eun Jung Kim, Na Ri Seok, Sun Suk Ryu, Myoung Nam Ha, Kwangha Lee; Korean J Crit Care Med. 2014;29(3):160-165. Published online August 31, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2014.29.3.160

5,157 View
61 Download
5 Crossref

Abstract PDF

BACKGROUND
Many terminally ill patients die while receiving life-sustaining treatment. Recently, the discussion of life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units (ICUs) has increased. This study is aimed to evaluate the current status of medical decision-making for dying patients.
METHODS
The medical records of patients who had died in the medical ICU from March 2011 to February 2012 were reviewed retrospectively.
RESULTS
Eighty-nine patients were enrolled. Their mean age was 65.8 +/- 13.3 years and 73.0% were male. The most common diagnosis was acute respiratory failure, and the most common comorbidity was hemato-oncologic malignancy. Withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining treatment including do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders was discussed for 64 (71.9%) patients. In almost all cases, the discussion involved a physician and the patient's family. No patient wrote advance directives themselves before ICU admission. Of the patients for whom withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining treatment was discussed, the decisions were recorded in formal consent documents in 36 (56.3%) cases, while 28 (43.7%) cases involved verbal consent. In patients granting verbal consent, death within one day of the consent was more common than in those with formal document consent (85.7% vs. 61.1%, p < 0.05). The most common demand was a DNR order. Patients died 2.7 +/- 1.0 days after the decision for removal of life-sustaining treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
The decision-making for life-sustaining treatment of dying patients in the ICU very often involves conflict. There is a general need to heighten our sensitivity on the objective decision-making based on patient autonomy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Agreement between Family Members and the Physician’s View in the ICU Environment: Personal Experience as a Factor Influencing Attitudes towards Corresponding Hypothetical Situations
Paraskevi Stamou, Dimitrios Tsartsalis, Georgios Papathanakos, Elena Dragioti, Mary Gouva, Vasilios Koulouras
Healthcare.2023; 11(3): 345. CrossRef
Family's Perception of Proxy Decision Making to Authorize Do Not Resuscitate Order of Elderly Patients in Long Term Care Facility: A Q-Methodological Study
Hyeon Jin Cho, Jiyeon Kang
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2021; 51(1): 15. CrossRef
Decision-making regarding withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment and the role of intensivists in the intensive care unit: a single-center study
Seo In Lee, Kyung Sook Hong, Jin Park, Young-Joo Lee
Acute and Critical Care.2020; 35(3): 179. CrossRef
Factors Associated With Quality of Death in Korean ICUs As Perceived by Medical Staff: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Survey
Jun Yeun Cho, Ju-Hee Park, Junghyun Kim, Jinwoo Lee, Jong Sun Park, Young-Jae Cho, Ho Il Yoon, Sang-Min Lee, Jae-Ho Lee, Choon-Taek Lee, Yeon Joo Lee
Critical Care Medicine.2019; 47(9): 1208. CrossRef
Transcultural Adaptation and Validation of Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire in Medical Intensive Care Units in South Korea
Jun Yeun Cho, Jinwoo Lee, Sang-Min Lee, Ju-Hee Park, Junghyun Kim, Youlim Kim, Sang Hoon Lee, Jong Sun Park, Young-Jae Cho, Ho Il Yoon, Jae Ho Lee, Choon-Taek Lee, Yeon Joo Lee
Acute and Critical Care.2018; 33(2): 95. CrossRef

A Survey of Patients Who Were Admitted for Life-Sustaining Therapy in Nationwide Medical Institutions: Jong Myon Bae, Joo Young Gong, Jae Ran Lee, Dae Seog Heo, Younsuck Koh; Korean J Crit Care Med. 2010;25(1):16-20.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2010.25.1.16

3,095 View
59 Download
16 Crossref

Abstract PDF

BACKGROUND
The study focused on figuring out the present status and distribution of the underlying diseases of Korean terminally ill patients (TIP) who were on life-support care (LSC) by conducting a nationwide health care survey.
METHODS
The authors of this study requested that the 308 nationwide hospitals that operate intensive care units answer a questionnaire that asked about the number of admitted TIPs and their underlying diseases at 12 Am, 22 July, 2009. The proportion of TIPs among all the admitted patients and the percentages of the TIP's underlying diseases were calculated.
RESULTS
In a total of 83.1% of the eligible hospitals responded, the proportion of TIP was 1.6 of 100 admitted patients. Terminal cancer was the leading underlying disease in the TIPs (42.4%). Five % of the patients on LSC were brain dead. More TIPs were admitted in the national/public or university hospitals than in the private or non-university hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS
Futile treatment seems to be administered to the TIPs in Korean hospitals. The quality of terminal care in Korean hospitals should be improved by the application of socially acceptable LSC guidelines. Timely government health plans, including hospice care, to improve the quality of palliative care should be launched and maintained.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Attitudes, Perceptions, and Experiences toward End-of-Life Care Decision-Making among Intensive Care Unit Nurses in Korea : An Integrative Review
JiYeon Choi, Youn-Jung Son, Kyounghoon Lee
Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing.2020; 13(1): 27. CrossRef
Transcultural Adaptation and Validation of Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire in Medical Intensive Care Units in South Korea
Jun Yeun Cho, Jinwoo Lee, Sang-Min Lee, Ju-Hee Park, Junghyun Kim, Youlim Kim, Sang Hoon Lee, Jong Sun Park, Young-Jae Cho, Ho Il Yoon, Jae Ho Lee, Choon-Taek Lee, Yeon Joo Lee
Acute and Critical Care.2018; 33(2): 95. CrossRef
A literature review on end-of-life care among Korean Americans
Hye-young K Park, Cristina C Hendrix
International Journal of Palliative Nursing.2018; 24(9): 452. CrossRef
Attitude, Role Perception and Nursing Stress on Life Sustaining Treatment among Intensive Care Unit Nurses
Su Jeong Lee, Hye Young Kim
Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2017; 29(2): 131. CrossRef
End‐of‐life communication in Korean older adults: With focus on advance care planning and advance directives
Dong Wook Shin, Ji Eun Lee, BeLong Cho, Sang Ho Yoo, SangYun Kim, Jun‐Hyun Yoo
Geriatrics & Gerontology International.2016; 16(4): 407. CrossRef
The Current Status of End-of-Life Care in Korea and Legislation of Well-Dying Act
Ji Eun Lee, Ae Jin Goo, Be Long Cho
Journal of the Korean Geriatrics Society.2016; 20(2): 65. CrossRef
The Current Status of Medical Decision-Making for Dying Patients in a Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Center Study
Kyunghwa Shin, Jeong Ha Mok, Sang Hee Lee, Eun Jung Kim, Na Ri Seok, Sun Suk Ryu, Myoung Nam Ha, Kwangha Lee
Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine.2014; 29(3): 160. CrossRef
Comparing the Preference for Terminal Care in Nurses and Patients
Dong Soon Kim, AeYoung So, Kyung-Sook Lee, Jung Sook Choi
Journal of muscle and joint health.2013; 20(3): 214. CrossRef
Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment for Terminal Patients in Korea
Dae Seog Heo
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2013; 28(1): 1. CrossRef
The End-of-Life Care in the Intensive Care Unit
Jae Young Moon, Yong Sup Shin
Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine.2013; 28(3): 163. CrossRef
Factors Affecting Shared Decision Making at End of Life in Korean Adults
Jo Kae-Hwa, An Gyeong-Ju
Holistic Nursing Practice.2013; 27(6): 329. CrossRef
On the life-sustaining treatment in Korea
Yoon-seong Lee
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2012; 55(12): 1161. CrossRef
Current status of end-of-life care in Korean hospitals
Younsuck Koh
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2012; 55(12): 1171. CrossRef
Medical Residents' Perception and Emotional Stress on Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Therapy
Jae Young Moon, Hee Young Lee, Chae-Man Lim, Younsuck Koh
Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine.2012; 27(1): 16. CrossRef
Predictive Factor s for City Dweller s’ Attitudes toward Death with Dignity
Kae Hwa Jo, Gyeong Ju An, Gyun Moo Kim, Yeon Ja Kim
The Korean Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care.2012; 15(4): 193. CrossRef
Charactersitics and issues of guideline to withdrawal of a life-sustaining therapy
Younsuck Koh, Dae-Seog Heo, Young Ho Yun, Jeong-Lim Moon, Hyoung Wook Park, Ji Tae Choung, Hyo Sung Jung, Bark Jang Byun, Yoon-Seong Lee
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2011; 54(7): 747. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search