Background The use of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in sepsis patients from bowel perforation is still debatable. However, few studies have evaluated the effect of IVIG as an adjuvant therapy after source control. This study aimed to analyze the effect of IVIG in critically ill patients who underwent surgery due to secondary peritonitis.
Methods In total, 646 medical records of surgical patients who were treated for secondary peritonitis were retrospectively analyzed. IVIG use, initial clinical data, and changes in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score over the 7-day admission in the intensive care unit for sepsis check, base excess, and delta neutrophil index (DNI) were analyzed. Mortalities and periodic profiles were assessed. Propensity scoring matching as comparative analysis was performed in the IVIG group and non-IVIG group.
Results General characteristics were not different between the two groups. The survival curve did not show a significantly reduced mortality in the IVIG. Moreover, the IVIG group did not have a lower risk ratio for mortality than the non-IVIG group. However, when the DNI were compared during the first 7 days, the reduction rate in the IVIG group was statistically faster than in the non-IVIG group (P<0.01).
Conclusions The use of IVIG was significantly associated with faster decrease in DNI which means faster reduction of inflammation. Since the immune system is rapidly activated, the additional use of IVIG after source control surgery in abdominal sepsis patients, especially those with immunocompromised patients can be considered. However, furthermore clinical studies are needed.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
USING INTRAVENOUS IMMUNOGLOBULIN IN A PATIENT WITH SEPTIC SHOCK AND MULTIPLE COMORBIDITIES: A REVIEW BASED ON A CLINICAL CASE Nataliya Matolynets, Jacek Rolinski, Khrystyna Lishchuk-Yakymovych, Yaroslav Tolstyak Proceeding of the Shevchenko Scientific Society. Medical Sciences.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Background Several recent studies have shown that preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) effectively produces hemostasis in patients with unstable pelvic fractures. However, few studies have examined the rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing PPP following an unstable pelvic fracture. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate factors associated with SSI in such patients.
Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of 188 patients who developed hemorrhagic shock due to pelvic fracture between April 2012 and May 2021. Forty-four patients were enrolled in this study.
Results SSI occurred in 15 of 44 patients (34.1%). The SSIs occurred more frequently in cases of repacking during the second-look surgery (0 vs. 4 [26.7%], P=0.010) and combined bladder-urethra injury (1 [3.4%] vs. 4 [26.7%], P=0.039). The incidence of SSIs was not significantly different between patients undergoing depacking within or after 48 hours (12 [41.4%] vs. 5 [33.3%], P=0.603). The mean time to diagnosis of SSI was 8.1±3.9 days from PPP. The most isolated organism was Staphylococcus epidermidis.
Conclusions Repacking and combined bladder-urethra injury are potential risk factors for SSI in patients with unstable pelvic fracture. Close observation is recommended for up to 8 days in patients with these risk factors. Further, 48 hours after PPP, removing the packed gauze on cessation of bleeding and not performing repacking can help prevent SSI. Additional analyses are necessary with a larger number of patients with the potential risk factors identified in this study.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Angioembolization Has Similar Efficacy and Lower Total Charges than Preperitoneal Pelvic Packing in Patients with Pelvic Ring or Acetabulum Fractures Aaron Singh, Travis Kotzur, Ezekial Koslosky, Rishi Gonuguntla, Lorenzo Canseco, David Momtaz, Ali Seifi, Case Martin Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Factors Associated With Pelvic Infection After Pre-Peritoneal Pelvic Packing for Hemodynamically Unstable Pelvic Fractures Jennifer E. Baker, Husayn A. Ladhani, Caitlyn McCall, Chelsea R. Horwood, Nicole L. Werner, Barry Platnick, Clay Cothren Burlew Surgical Infections.2024; 25(5): 399. CrossRef
Comparison of Conventional versus Modified Preperitoneal Pelvic Packing in Patients with Bleeding Pelvic Fractures: A Single-Center Retrospective Pilot Study Sebeom Jeon, Byungchul Yu, Gil Jae Lee, Min A Lee, Jungnam Lee, Kang Kook Choi Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(14): 4062. CrossRef
Current Management of Hemodynamically Unstable Patients with Pelvic Fracture Kevin Harrell, Chelsea Horwood, Clay Cothren Burlew Current Surgery Reports.2023; 11(4): 92. CrossRef
Open Fixation After Preperitoneal Pelvic Packing Is Associated With a High Surgical Site Infection Rate Ye Joon Kim, Bryan L. Scott, Fredric M. Pieracci, Ernest E. Moore, Cyril Mauffrey, Joshua A. Parry Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma.2023; 37(11): 547. CrossRef
Extraperitoneal pelvic packing in trauma – a review Sajad Ahmad Salati Polish Journal of Surgery.2022; 95(3): 46. CrossRef