KSCCM
Search
- Page Path
- HOME > Search
Original Article
- Ethics
- Comparison of factors influencing the decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment in intensive care unit patients after implementation of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Act in Korea
- Claire Junga Kim, Kyung Sook Hong, Sooyoung Cho, Jin Park
- Acute Crit Care. 2024;39(2):294-303. Published online May 24, 2024
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2023.01130
- 5,903 View
- 157 Download
- 3 Web of Science
- 5 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
Supplementary Material - Background
The decision to discontinue intensive care unit (ICU) treatment during the end-oflife stage has recently become a significant concern in Korea, with an observed increase in life-sustaining treatment (LST) withdrawal. There is a growing demand for evidence-based support for patients, families, and clinicians in making LST decisions. This study aimed to identify factors influencing LST decisions in ICU inpatients and to analyze their impact on healthcare utilization.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed medical records of ICU patients with neurological disorders, infectious disorders, or cancer who were treated at a single university hospital between January 1, 2019 and July 7, 2021. Factors influencing the decision to withdraw LST were compared between those who withdrew LST and those who did not.
Results
Among 54,699 hospital admissions, LST was withdrawn in 550 cases (1%). Cancer was the most common diagnosis, followed by pneumonia and cerebral infarction. Among ICU inpatients, LST was withdrawn from 215 (withdrawal group). The withdrawal group was older (78 vs. 75 years, P=0.002), had longer total hospital stays (16 vs. 11 days, P<0.001), and higher ICU readmission rates than the control group. There were no significant differences in the healthcare costs of ICU stay between the two groups. Most LST decisions (86%) were made by family.
Conclusions
The decisions to withdraw LST of ICU inpatients were influenced by age, readmission, and disease category. ICU costs were similar between the withdrawal and control groups. Further research is needed to tailor LST decisions in the ICU. -
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Awareness, attitudes, and educational needs regarding the life-sustaining treatment decision-making act in Korea among healthcare providers and medical students: a comparative analysis
Jooseon Lee, So-yun Kim, Duk-ki Kim, Green Hong, Song I Lee
BMC Medical Ethics.2026;[Epub] CrossRef - Cardiac arrest after hanging: A scoping review
Thomas Fisher, Clodagh Beattie, Quentin Otto, Joanna Hooper, Jerry P. Nolan, Jasmeet Soar
Resuscitation.2025; 207: 110510. CrossRef - Determinants of Limiting Life-Sustaining Treatment in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study in Korean Intensive Care Units
I Re Heo, Tae Hoon Kim, Won Jai Jung, Gil Myeong Seong, Sun Jung Kwon, Jae Young Moon, Song-I Lee, Do Sik Moon, Tae-Ok Kim, Chul Park, Eun Young Choi, Jung-Wan Yoo, Sunghoon Park, Ae Rin Baek, Sung Yoon Lim, Jung Soo Kim, Jongmin Lee, Chi Ryang Chung, San
Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases.2025; 88(3): 557. CrossRef - Public Perspectives on Palliative and Hospice Care: Social Media Content Analysis Using Topic Modeling and Multiclass Sentiment Analysis
Aeri Kim, Kyungmi Woo
Journal of Medical Internet Research.2025; 27: e70836. CrossRef - End-of-life care among Koreans in critical care and community-dwelling Korean Americans: A cross-cultural scoping review
Soo Hyun Kim, Changhwan Kim, Erh-Chi Hsu, Zackary Berger, Hae-Ra Han, Binu Koirala, Jung Kwak, Katherine A. Ornstein, Rebecca Wright
Palliative and Supportive Care.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
- Awareness, attitudes, and educational needs regarding the life-sustaining treatment decision-making act in Korea among healthcare providers and medical students: a comparative analysis
First
Prev
