Chul Park, Nam Su Ku, Dae Won Park, Joo Hyun Park, Tae Sun Ha, Do Wan Kim, So Young Park, Youjin Chang, Kwang Wook Jo, Moon Seong Baek, Yijun Seo, Tae Gun Shin, Gina Yu, Jongmin Lee, Yong Jun Choi, Ji Young Jang, Yun Tae Jung, Inseok Jeong, Hwa Jin Cho, Ala Woo, Sua Kim, Dae-Hwan Bae, Sung Wook Kang, Sun Hyo Park, Gee Young Suh, Sunghoon Park
Acute Crit Care. 2024;39(4):445-472. Published online November 18, 2024
Background Despite recent advances and global improvements in sepsis recognition and supportive care, mortality rates remain high, and adherence to sepsis bundle components in Korea is low. To address this, the Korean Sepsis Alliance, affiliated with the Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine, developed the first sepsis treatment guidelines for Korea based on a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods A de novo method was used to develop the guidelines. Methodologies included determining key questions, conducting a literature search and selection, assessing the risk of bias, synthesizing evidence, and developing recommendations. The certainty of evidence and the strength of recommendations were determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. Draft recommendations underwent internal and external review processes and public hearings. The development of these guidelines was supported by a research grant from the Korean Disease Control and Prevention Agency.
Results In these guidelines, we focused on early treatments for adult patients with sepsis and septic shock. Through the guideline development process, 12 key questions and their respective recommendations were formulated. These include lactate measurement, fluid therapies, target blood pressure, antibiotic administration, use of vasopressors and dobutamine, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and echocardiography.
Conclusions These guidelines aim to support medical professionals in making appropriate decisions about treating adult sepsis and septic shock. We hope these guidelines will increase awareness of sepsis and reduce its mortality rate.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Comparison between norepinephrine plus epinephrine and norepinephrine plus vasopressin after return of spontaneous circulation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Sejoong Ahn, Bo-Yeong Jin, Sukyo Lee, Jong-Hak Park, Hanjin Cho, Sungwoo Moon, Sang Kuk Han, Phil Cho Choi, Young Hwan Lee, Sang O. Park, Jong Seok Lee, Ki Young Jeong, Sung Hyuk Choi, Young Hoon Yoon, Su Jin Kim, Kap Su Han, Min Seob Sim, Gun Tak Lee, Yo Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Recommendations for the use of biomarkers for the management of adults with sepsis: a scoping review and critical appraisal Miriam Mateos-Haro, Ana Garcia-Santa-Vinuela, Daniel Molano-Franco, Ivan Solà, Federico Gordo-Vidal, María Cruz Martín-Delgado, Jesus Lopez-Alcalde, Javier Zamora BMJ Open.2025; 15(7): e090922. CrossRef
Regional Adherence to Early Sepsis Management Bundle and Associated Mortality in Hong Kong Between 2009–2018 Jack Zhenhe Zhang, Chun Hei Chan, Lok Ching Chang, Lok Ching Sandra Chiu, Pauline Yeung Ng, Manimala Dharmangadan, Eunise Ho, Steven Ling, Man Yee Man, Ka Man Fong, Ting Liong, Alwin Wai Tak Yeung, Ka Fai Au, Jacky Ka Hing Chan, Michele Tang, Katy Hoi Ki Open Forum Infectious Diseases.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Outcomes of septic shock from urinary and non-urinary sources in nonagenarians and centenarians admitted to intensive care units Je Min Suh, Laurence Weinberg, Nattaya Raykateeraroj, Jerry Lim, Angelina Yoon, David Pilcher, Dong-Kyu Lee Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Association between emergency department–to–intensive care unit transfer time and mortality in patients with septic shock: a target trial emulation with septic shock in South Korea Ji Hyun Cha, Danbee Kang, Ryoung-Eun Ko, Won Young Kim, Dong-gon Hyun, Yeon Joo Lee, Woo Hyun Cho, Sunghoon Park, Juhee Cho, Gee Young Suh Acute and Critical Care.2025; 40(4): 548. CrossRef
Early Versus Delayed Norepinephrine Initiation in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Observational Studies Chibuzo C Manafa, Oluwayemisi E Ekor, Akintunde C Akinboboye, Okelue E Okobi, Gift Ojukwu, Osemwegie O Ugbo, Michael U Mochu, Emasenyie Isikwei, Sergio Hernandez Borges, Miguel Diaz-Miret Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and variations in recommendations Hong-Yan Li, Shan-Ling Jiang, Jing Wang, Hai-Shan Wang, Li-Hong Wang BMC Infectious Diseases.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Evidence-Based Interventions for Sepsis Management in Critically Ill Adults: A Systematic Review Elsa Jardim Sousa, Michelle de Soresa Virissimo, Abel Mendonça Viveiros, Ana Alves, Valter Gonçalves European Journal of Medical and Health Research.2025; 3(6): 232. CrossRef
Background Recent advances in diagnosis and treatment have improved long-term outcomes in cancer patients. As a result, the requirement for a rapid response team (RRT) for cancer patients is also increasing. This study aimed to analyze utilization of an RRT and the associations between related factors and mortality in a population of cancer patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included hospitalized patients at a single academic medical center in Seoul, Korea, who required RRT activation during a 6-year period from June 2013 to December 2018. Results: Overall, 164 of the 457 patients who met the above criteria were cancer patients, and they had a significantly higher Charlson comorbidity score than the non-cancer patients (5.0 vs. 7.0, P<0.001). A significantly larger proportion of cancer patients required intensive care unit transfer (51.8% vs. 41.0%, P=0.032). Cancer patients also had significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared with other patients (39.6% vs. 10.9%, P<0.001). Furthermore, presence of cancer was independently associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11 to 3.93). Among cancer patients, higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II at the time of RRT activation was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality regardless of malignancy (adjusted OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.15). Conclusions: Cancer patients requiring RRT activation have significantly higher rates of inhospital mortality than patients not using RRT. Higher severity score at the time of RRT activation in patients with malignancy was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Intensivmedizinisches Kontinuum in der Versorgung von Krebskranken Catherina Lück InFo Hämatologie + Onkologie.2023; 26(5): 10. CrossRef
Characteristics and outcomes of patients screened by rapid response team who transferred to the intensive care unit Song-I. Lee, Jeong Suk Koh, Yoon Joo Kim, Da Hyun Kang, Jeong Eun Lee BMC Emergency Medicine.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Characteristics and Prognosis of Hospitalized Patients at High Risk of Deterioration Identified by the Rapid Response System: a Multicenter Cohort Study Sang Hyuk Kim, Ji Young Hong, Youlim Kim Journal of Korean Medical Science.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Novel Adaptive T-Cell Oncological Treatments Lead to New Challenges for Medical Emergency Teams: A 2-Year Experience From a Tertiary-Care Hospital in Switzerland Anna Sarah Messmer, Yok-Ai Que, Christoph Schankin, Yara Banz, Ulrike Bacher, Urban Novak, Thomas Pabst Critical Care Explorations.2021; 3(10): e0552. CrossRef
Outcomes of second-tier rapid response activations in a tertiary referral hospital: A prospective observational study Ken Junyang Goh, Hui Zhong Chai, Lit Soo Ng, Joanna Phone Ko, Deshawn Chong Xuan Tan, Hui Li Tan, Constance Wei-Shan Teo, Ghee Chee Phua, Qiao Li Tan Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.2021; 50(11): 838. CrossRef
Effectiveness of Rapid Response Team on In-hospital Mortality in Patients with Hematologic Malignancy So-Jung Park, Sang-Bum Hong, Chae-Man Lim, Youn-Suck Koh, Jin-Won Huh Quality Improvement in Health Care.2021; 27(2): 18. CrossRef
Background Aging is a significant issue worldwide, and Korea is one of the most rapidly aging countries. Along with the demographic transition, the age structure of intensive care unit (ICU) patients changes as well.
Methods The aim of this study was to analyze the change in age distribution of the ICU patients over the last 10 years and its effect on clinical outcomes. Single-center, retrospective analysis of all patients aged ≥18 years admitted to either the medical or surgical ICU at St. Paul’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, between January 2005 and December 2014 was conducted. For clinical outcome, in-hospital mortality, duration of ICU stay, and hospital stay were analyzed. Cost analysis was performed to show the economic burden of each age strata.
Results A total of 10,366 ICU patients were admitted to the chosen ICUs during the study period. The proportion of elderly patients aged ≥65 years increased from 47.9% in 2005 to 63.7% in 2014, and the proportion of the very elderly patients aged ≥80 years increased from 12.8% to 20.7%. However, this increased proportion of elderly patients did not lead to increased in-hospital mortality. The percent of ICU treatment days attributable to elderly patients increased from 51.1% in year 2005 to 64.0% in 2014. The elderly ICU patients were associated with higher in-hospital mortality compared to younger age groups.
Conclusions The proportion of elderly patients admitted to ICUs increased over the last decade. However, overall in-hospital mortality has not increased during the same period.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Korean Guidelines for the Management and Antibiotic Therapy in Adult Patients with Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia Hayoung Choi, Kyung Hoon Min, Young Seok Lee, Youjin Chang, Bo Young Lee, Jee Youn Oh, Ae-Rin Baek, Jongmin Lee, Kyeongman Jeon Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases.2025; 88(1): 69. CrossRef
Ethical issues surrounding appropriate care for older persons in the Intensive Care Unit Jean-Louis VINCENT Panminerva Medica.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Age Distribution and Clinical Results of Critically Ill Patients above 65-Year-Old in an Aging Society: A Retrospective Cohort Study Song I Lee, Jin Won Huh, Sang-Bum Hong, Younsuck Koh, Chae-Man Lim Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases.2024; 87(3): 338. CrossRef
The impact of age on mortality in the intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study in Malaysia Abdul Jabbar Ismail, W Mohd Nazaruddin W Hassan, Mohd Basri Mat Nor, Wan Fadzlina Wan Muhd Shukeri Acute and Critical Care.2024; 39(3): 390. CrossRef
Impact of lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in aged mice Sukjin Bae, In Kyoung Kim, Jeonghyeon Im, Heayon Lee, Sang Haak Lee, Sei Won Kim Experimental Lung Research.2023; 49(1): 193. CrossRef
Perfil de mortalidade de idosos jovens hospitalizados em uma unidade de terapia intensiva Jeferson Moreira dos Santos, Ricardo Franklin De Freitas Mussi , Jessica Lane Pereira Santos , Larissa Chaves Pedreira Silva, Maria Antônia Alves de Souza Ciência, Cuidado e Saúde.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Characteristics and prognostic factors of very elderly patients admitted to the intensive care unit Song-I Lee, Younsuck Koh, Jin Won Huh, Sang-Bum Hong, Chae-Man Lim Acute and Critical Care.2022; 37(3): 372. CrossRef
Challenges Experienced by Family Caregivers of the Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients in Korea: An Integrative Review JiYeon Choi, Judith A. Tate, Youn-Jung Son Clinical Nursing Research.2021; 30(4): 423. CrossRef
Retrospective Analysis of Long-Term Survival in Very Elderly (age ≥80) Critically Ill Patients of a Medical Intensive Care Unit at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Korea Seung Hun Lee, Ju-Young Kim, Tae Hoon Kim, Sun Mi Ju, Jung-Wan Yoo, Seung Jun Lee, Yu Ji Cho, Yi Yeong Jeong, Jong Deog Lee, Ho Cheol Kim Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases.2020; 83(3): 242. CrossRef
Should Very Old Patients Be Admitted to the Intensive Care Units? Jun Kwon Cha, In-Ae Song The Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine.2017; 32(4): 376. CrossRef