Background The design of intensive care units (ICUs) is increasingly acknowledged as a crucial factor affecting patient outcomes. Transitioning from multi-bed patient rooms (MPRs) to single-bed patient rooms (SPRs) aims to improve infection control, patient privacy, and quality of care. However, concerns remain regarding potential patient isolation and reduced staff situational awareness. This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes in SPR-structured ICUs compared to mixed SPR and MPR ICUs.
Methods This multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted across three university-affiliated tertiary hospitals between April 2022 and August 2023. The study population included ICU patients aged ≥18 years, excluding those admitted to cardiac and neonatal ICUs. Outcomes assessed included ICU mortality and severity scores based on Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores.
Results This study included 3,179 ICU patients across three sites: site A consisted exclusively of SPRs, while sites B and C had mixed SPR and MPR arrangements. ICU mortality rates were 8.3%, 15.2%, and 9.7% for sites A, B, and C, respectively (P<0.001). Propensity score matching and logistic regression analysis demonstrated that SPRs were associated with significantly reduced ICU mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.40–0.73).
Conclusions SPRs were associated with a protective effect, reducing ICU mortality. Clinical outcomes in ICUs appear to be influenced by structural design improvements alongside other clinical factors.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Single Versus Shared ICU Rooms and the Risk of Unplanned Extubation: A Real-World Cohort Showing Tube Displacement as an Early Signal Beatriz Amaral Costa Savino, Danilo Franco Guidi, Silvia Helena Ferraz Planard, Viviane Perin, Bruno Augusto Goulart Campos Cureus.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Survival improvement through well-designed intensive care unit architecture Dong Hyun Lee Acute and Critical Care.2025; 40(2): 349. CrossRef
We report a case of subclavian artery laceration caused by the removal of a pigtail pleural drainage catheter in a patient with a pneumothorax. The patient was successfully resuscitated through diagnostic angiography with subsequent balloon occlusion and primary repair of the injured subclavian artery. Although pigtail drainage of a pneumothorax is known to be safe and effective, proper insertion and removal techniques should be emphasized to reduce the risk of complications.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A randomised controlled trial of intrapleural balloon intercostal chest drains to prevent drain displacement Rachel M. Mercer, Eleanor Mishra, Radhika Banka, John P. Corcoran, Cyrus Daneshvar, Rakesh K. Panchal, Tarek Saba, Melanie Caswell, Sarah Johnstone, Daniel Menzies, Sana Ahmer, Mitra Shahidi, Amelia O. Clive, Manish Gautam, Giles Cox, Chris Orton, Judith European Respiratory Journal.2022; 60(1): 2101753. CrossRef
AN UNUSUAL COMPLICATION OF PIGTAIL CATHETER: COLONIC PENETRATION Yakup Ülger, Anıl Delik Gastroenterology Nursing.2021; 44(6): 463. CrossRef
Median Sternotomy for the Management of Life-Threatening Bleeding Resulting from Proximal Upper Extremity Amputation Hyunseong Kang, Gyu Bum Seo, Su Wan Kim Journal of Acute Care Surgery.2020; 10(2): 58. CrossRef