Background The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scoring system and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring system are widely used for critically ill patients. We evaluated whether APACHE II score and SOFA score predict the outcome for trauma patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).
Methods We retrospectively analyzed trauma patients admitted to the ICU in a single trauma center between January 2014 and December 2015. The APACHE II score was figured out based on the data acquired from the first 24 hours of admission; the SOFA score was evaluated based on the first 3 days in the ICU. A total of 241 patients were available for analysis. Injury Severity score, APACHE II score, and SOFA score were evaluated.
Results The overall survival rate was 83.4%. The non-survival group had a significantly high APACHE II score (24.1 ± 8.1 vs. 12.3 ± 7.2, P < 0.001) and SOFA score (7.7 ± 1.7 vs. 4.3 ± 1.9, P < 0.001) at admission. SOFA score had the highest areas under the curve (0.904). During the first 3 days, SOFA score remained high in the non-survival group. In the non-survival group, cardiovascular system, neurological system, renal system, and coagulation system scores were significantly higher.
Conclusions In ICU trauma patients, both SOFA and APACHE II scores were good predictors of outcome, with the SOFA score being the most effective. In trauma ICU patients, the trauma scoring system should be complemented, recognizing that multi-organ failure is an important factor for mortality.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Identification of TRIM52 as a potential biomarker in mortality risk assessment in patients with sepsis Ke Wang, Zhubin Yang, Chun Xiang Wu, Ju Cao Human Immunology.2024; 85(6): 111174. CrossRef
Clinical significance of lactate-to-albumin ratio in patients with influenza A virus-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome: a single-center retrospective study Jinhui Gao, Xuanzhe Yang, Xiang Fang, Ziyi Zhang, Dapeng Wang, Jiajia Wang BMC Anesthesiology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Cell-free DNA as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for adult sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Awirut Charoensappakit, Kritsanawan Sae-khow, Pongpera Rattanaliam, Nuntanuj Vutthikraivit, Monvasi Pecheenbuvan, Suwasin Udomkarnjananun, Asada leelahavanichkul Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Evaluation of the sequential organ failure assessment score and newly introduced criteria – Traumasis - in traffic collision patients Sion Jo, Taeoh Jeong, Boyoung Park The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.2022; 51: 98. CrossRef
Predictive value of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and Revised Trauma Score (RTS) for the short-term prognosis of emergency trauma patients: a retrospective study Zhejun Yu, Feng Xu, Du Chen BMJ Open.2021; 11(3): e041882. CrossRef
Risk factors for abdominal surgical site infection after exploratory laparotomy among combat casualties Joseph D. Bozzay, Patrick F. Walker, David W. Schechtman, Faraz Shaikh, Laveta Stewart, M. Leigh Carson, David R. Tribble, Carlos J. Rodriguez, Matthew J. Bradley Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery.2021; 91(2S): S247. CrossRef
Anaphylactic reaction during the perioperative period typically exhibits rapid onset, varying clinical manifestations, and an expected mortality rate of 1.5-9%. Neuromuscular blocking agents are the leading cause of perioperative anaphylaxis. Here, we report a severe case of anaphylaxis that developed in a 66-year-old man due to cisatracurium administration. And he was successfully managed by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and the patient was successfully weaned off 24 hours later.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Case report: management of differential diagnosis and treatment of severe anaphylaxis in the setting of spinal anesthesia Brian M. Osman, Joni M. Maga, Sebastian M. Baquero Journal of Clinical Anesthesia.2016; 35: 145. CrossRef