Chul Park, Nam Su Ku, Dae Won Park, Joo Hyun Park, Tae Sun Ha, Do Wan Kim, So Young Park, Youjin Chang, Kwang Wook Jo, Moon Seong Baek, Yijun Seo, Tae Gun Shin, Gina Yu, Jongmin Lee, Yong Jun Choi, Ji Young Jang, Yun Tae Jung, Inseok Jeong, Hwa Jin Cho, Ala Woo, Sua Kim, Dae-Hwan Bae, Sung Wook Kang, Sun Hyo Park, Gee Young Suh, Sunghoon Park
Acute Crit Care. 2024;39(4):445-472. Published online November 18, 2024
Background Despite recent advances and global improvements in sepsis recognition and supportive care, mortality rates remain high, and adherence to sepsis bundle components in Korea is low. To address this, the Korean Sepsis Alliance, affiliated with the Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine, developed the first sepsis treatment guidelines for Korea based on a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods A de novo method was used to develop the guidelines. Methodologies included determining key questions, conducting a literature search and selection, assessing the risk of bias, synthesizing evidence, and developing recommendations. The certainty of evidence and the strength of recommendations were determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. Draft recommendations underwent internal and external review processes and public hearings. The development of these guidelines was supported by a research grant from the Korean Disease Control and Prevention Agency.
Results In these guidelines, we focused on early treatments for adult patients with sepsis and septic shock. Through the guideline development process, 12 key questions and their respective recommendations were formulated. These include lactate measurement, fluid therapies, target blood pressure, antibiotic administration, use of vasopressors and dobutamine, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and echocardiography.
Conclusions These guidelines aim to support medical professionals in making appropriate decisions about treating adult sepsis and septic shock. We hope these guidelines will increase awareness of sepsis and reduce its mortality rate.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Artificial intelligence-driven cluster analysis for identifying clinical phenotypes in suspected sepsis patients in the emergency department Daun Jeong, Jong Rul Park, Seung Jin Maeng, Jung Won Choi, Gun Tak Lee, Sung Yeon Hwang, Chulhong Kim, Jong Eun Park, Tae Gun Shin BMC Emergency Medicine.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Care Pathway and Outcomes in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Narrative Review from Emergency Department Recognition to PICU Management Efrossini Briassouli, George Briassoulis Children.2026; 13(5): 622. CrossRef
Comparison between norepinephrine plus epinephrine and norepinephrine plus vasopressin after return of spontaneous circulation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Sejoong Ahn, Bo-Yeong Jin, Sukyo Lee, Jong-Hak Park, Hanjin Cho, Sungwoo Moon, Sang Kuk Han, Phil Cho Choi, Young Hwan Lee, Sang O. Park, Jong Seok Lee, Ki Young Jeong, Sung Hyuk Choi, Young Hoon Yoon, Su Jin Kim, Kap Su Han, Min Seob Sim, Gun Tak Lee, Yo Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Recommendations for the use of biomarkers for the management of adults with sepsis: a scoping review and critical appraisal Miriam Mateos-Haro, Ana Garcia-Santa-Vinuela, Daniel Molano-Franco, Ivan Solà, Federico Gordo-Vidal, María Cruz Martín-Delgado, Jesus Lopez-Alcalde, Javier Zamora BMJ Open.2025; 15(7): e090922. CrossRef
Regional Adherence to Early Sepsis Management Bundle and Associated Mortality in Hong Kong Between 2009–2018 Jack Zhenhe Zhang, Chun Hei Chan, Lok Ching Chang, Lok Ching Sandra Chiu, Pauline Yeung Ng, Manimala Dharmangadan, Eunise Ho, Steven Ling, Man Yee Man, Ka Man Fong, Ting Liong, Alwin Wai Tak Yeung, Ka Fai Au, Jacky Ka Hing Chan, Michele Tang, Katy Hoi Ki Open Forum Infectious Diseases.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Outcomes of septic shock from urinary and non-urinary sources in nonagenarians and centenarians admitted to intensive care units Je Min Suh, Laurence Weinberg, Nattaya Raykateeraroj, Jerry Lim, Angelina Yoon, David Pilcher, Dong-Kyu Lee Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Association between emergency department–to–intensive care unit transfer time and mortality in patients with septic shock: a target trial emulation with septic shock in South Korea Ji Hyun Cha, Danbee Kang, Ryoung-Eun Ko, Won Young Kim, Dong-gon Hyun, Yeon Joo Lee, Woo Hyun Cho, Sunghoon Park, Juhee Cho, Gee Young Suh Acute and Critical Care.2025; 40(4): 548. CrossRef
Early Versus Delayed Norepinephrine Initiation in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Observational Studies Chibuzo C Manafa, Oluwayemisi E Ekor, Akintunde C Akinboboye, Okelue E Okobi, Gift Ojukwu, Osemwegie O Ugbo, Michael U Mochu, Emasenyie Isikwei, Sergio Hernandez Borges, Miguel Diaz-Miret Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and variations in recommendations Hong-Yan Li, Shan-Ling Jiang, Jing Wang, Hai-Shan Wang, Li-Hong Wang BMC Infectious Diseases.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Evidence-Based Interventions for Sepsis Management in Critically Ill Adults: A Systematic Review Elsa Jardim Sousa, Michelle de Soresa Virissimo, Abel Mendonça Viveiros, Ana Alves, Valter Gonçalves European Journal of Medical and Health Research.2025; 3(6): 232. CrossRef
Intra-abdominal hypertension can have severe consequences, including abdominal compartment syndrome, which can contribute to multi-organ failure. An increase in intra-abdominal hypertension is influenced by factors such as diminished abdominal wall compliance, increased intraluminal content, and certain systemic conditions. Regular measurement of intra-abdominal pressure is essential, and particular attention must be paid to patient positioning. Nonsurgical treatments, such as decompression of intraluminal content using a nasogastric tube, percutaneous drainage, and fluid balance optimization, play crucial roles. Additionally, point-of-care ultrasonography aids in the diagnosis and treatment of intra-abdominal hypertension. Emphasizing the importance of regular measurements, timely decompressive laparotomy is a definitive, but complex, treatment option. Balancing the urgency of surgical intervention against potential postoperative complications is challenging.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A Multicentre Survey of Paediatric Critical Care Nurses' Awareness, Knowledge and Practice of Intra‐Abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome ZhiRu Li, FangYan Lu, YanHong Dai, Li Ji, HaiLi Huang, PanPan He, WanYing Zhang, HuaFen Wang Nursing in Critical Care.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Severe trauma care: advances and future directions in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques and information technology support Feifei Jin, Shu li, Xuemin Zhang, Wei Huang, Jing Zhou, Zhongdi Liu, Pan Hu, Yanqiu Wu, Zixiao Zhang, Lijun Hou, Xiangjun Bai, Tianbing Wang Medical Review.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Successful Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Using a Reinforced Tissue Matrix After Severe Pancreatitis and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome: A Case Report David A Baer, James R DeLine Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Hemodynamics assessment in critically ill children with increased intra-abdominal pressure Marwa Tolba, Ahmed Mesbah, Ahmed Abd El-Bassat, Amr Mohamed Zoair, Nahed Hablas, Khaled Talaat Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Trajectories of cumulative fluid balance and the association with pressure injuries in ICU patients Xiangping Chen, Peiqi Liu, Bingyan Zhu, Xiumin Qiu, Wei Yu, Yuewen Lao, Xiaoyan Gong, Yiyu Zhuang International Journal of Nursing Sciences.2025; 12(6): 566. CrossRef
Efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture for paralytic ileus in severe stroke: a protocol of multicenter, randomized controlled trial Dehui Nie, Meiling Zhang, Bin Han, Dan Jin, Jianlong Huang, Liming Lu Frontiers in Neurology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
International cross-sectional survey on current and updated definitions of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome Prashant Nasa, Robert D. Wise, Marije Smit, Stefan Acosta, Scott D’Amours, William Beaubien–Souligny, Zsolt Bodnar, Federico Coccolini, Neha S. Dangayach, Wojciech Dabrowski, Juan Duchesne, Janeth C. Ejike, Goran Augustin, Bart De Keulenaer, Andrew W. Kir World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Background Peri-intubation cardiac arrest (PICA) following emergent endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a rare, however, potentially preventable type of cardiac arrest. Limited published data have described factors associated with inpatient PICA and patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors associated with PICA among hospitalized patients emergently intubated at a general ward as compared to non-PICA inpatients. In addition, we identified a difference of clinical outcomes in patients between PICA and other types of inpatient cardiac arrest (OTICA).
Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients at two institutions between January 2016 to December 2017. PICA was defined in patients emergently intubated who experienced cardiac arrest within 20 minutes after ETI. The non-PICA group consisted of inpatients emergently intubated without cardiac arrest. Risk factors for PICA were identified through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Clinical outcomes were compared between PICA and OTICA.
Results Fifteen episodes of PICA occurred during the study period, accounting for 3.6% of all inpatient arrests. Intubation-related shock index, number of intubation attempts, pre-ETI vasopressor use, and neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) use, especially succinylcholine, were independently associated with PICA. Clinical outcomes of intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, survival to discharge, and neurologic outcome at hospital discharge were not significantly different between PICA and OTICA.
Conclusions We identified four independent risk factors for PICA, and preintubation hemodynamic stabilization and avoidance of NMBA were possibly correlated with a decreased PICA risk. Clinical outcomes of PICA were similar to those of OTICA.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Incidence and predisposing factors associated with peri-intubation cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis Nattikarn Meelarp, Wachira Wongtanasarasin Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine.2025; 25(2): 130. CrossRef
Risk Factors of Peri-Intubation Cardiac Arrest in Critically Ill Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department of a Low-Income Country: A Case-Control Study Noman Ali, Nazir Najeeb Kapadia, Salman Muhammad Soomar, Ahmed Raheem, Naheed Habibullah, Zahra Habib, Shahan Waheed The Journal of Emergency Medicine.2025; 76: 26. CrossRef
Atemwegssicherung in HD: Standards für Videolaryngoskopie und flexible Endoskopie Katharina Hardt, Henning Niedmers, Frank Wappler AINS - Anästhesiologie · Intensivmedizin · Notfallmedizin · Schmerztherapie.2025; 60(07/08): 415. CrossRef
Nomogram model for predicting post-intubation cardiac arrest in the emergency department: a retrospective study Xiaohua Lou, Bingwen Zhang, Miaomiao Jin, Yuan Fang, Daoyuan Jin, Hao Zhou Resuscitation Plus.2025; 26: 101115. CrossRef
Cardiac Arrest Caused by Tracheal Intubation During Anesthesia Induction: A Case Report Haiyun Gu, Haikun Zhang, Le Cao, Jinxiang Yu, Tao Zhao Clinical Case Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Risk factors for peri-intubation cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis Ting-Hao Yang, Shih-Chieh Shao, Yi-Chih Lee, Chien-Han Hsiao, Chieh-Ching Yen Biomedical Journal.2024; 47(3): 100656. CrossRef
Patient Safety in Anesthesiology: Progress, Challenges, and Prospects Wafaa Harfaoui, Mustapha Alilou, Ahmed Rhassane El Adib, Saad Zidouh, Aziz Zentar, Brahim Lekehal, Lahcen Belyamani, Majdouline Obtel Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Reverse shock index (RSI) as a predictor of post-intubation cardiac arrest (PICA) Mehdi Torabi, Ghazal Soleimani Mahani, Moghaddameh Mirzaee International Journal of Emergency Medicine.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Incidence and factors associated with out-of-hospital peri-intubation cardiac arrest: a secondary analysis of the CURASMUR trial Cédric Gil-Jardiné, Patricia Jabre, Frederic Adnet, Thomas Nicol, Patrick Ecollan, Bertrand Guihard, Cyril Ferdynus, Valery Bocquet, Xavier Combes Internal and Emergency Medicine.2022; 17(2): 611. CrossRef
Risk factors associated with peri-intubation cardiac arrest in the emergency department Ting-Hao Yang, Kuan-Fu Chen, Shi-Ying Gao, Chih-Chuan Lin The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.2022; 58: 229. CrossRef
Comparison of video-stylet and conventional laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in adults with cervical spine immobilization: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis I-Wen Chen, Yu-Yu Li, Kuo-Chuan Hung, Ying-Jen Chang, Jen-Yin Chen, Ming-Chung Lin, Kuei-Fen Wang, Chien-Ming Lin, Ping-Wen Huang, Cheuk-Kwan Sun Medicine.2022; 101(33): e30032. CrossRef
Peri-Intubation Cardiorespiratory Arrest Risk in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review Rohit S. Loomba, Riddhi Patel, Elizabeth Kunnel, Enrique G. Villarreal, Juan S. Farias, Saul Flores Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of Suction Rates Between a Standard Yankauer, a Commercial Large-Bore Suction Device, and a Makeshift Large-Bore Suction Device Dhimitri A. Nikolla, Briana King, Andrew Heslin, Jestin N. Carlson The Journal of Emergency Medicine.2021; 61(3): 265. CrossRef
Emergency Airway Management Outside the Operating Room: Current Evidence and Management Strategies Kunal Karamchandani, Jonathan Wheelwright, Ae Lim Yang, Nathaniel D. Westphal, Ashish K. Khanna, Sheila N. Myatra Anesthesia & Analgesia.2021; 133(3): 648. CrossRef
Further Validation of a Novel Acute Myocardial Infarction Risk Stratification (nARS) System for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Shinnosuke Sawano, Kenichi Sakakura, Kei Yamamoto, Yousuke Taniguchi, Takunori Tsukui, Masaru Seguchi, Hiroshi Wada, Shin-ichi Momomura, Hideo Fujita International Heart Journal.2020; 61(3): 463. CrossRef
Corrigendum to: Risk factors associated with inpatient cardiac arrest during emergency endotracheal intubation at general wards Chul Park Acute and Critical Care.2020; 35(3): 228. CrossRef