-
Complications of Central Venous Totally Implantable Access Port: Internal Jugular Versus Subclavian Access
-
Pil Young Jung, Hoon Ryu, Jae Hung Jung, Eunbi Lee, Joong Hwan Oh, Chun Sung Byun, Il Hwan Park
-
Korean J Crit Care Med. 2015;30(4):365-365. Published online November 30, 2015
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2015.30.4.365
-
Corrects: Acute Crit Care 2015;30(1):13
-
 PDF
- Thoracic Surgery
-
Complications of Central Venous Totally Implantable Access Port: Internal Jugular Versus Subclavian Access
-
Pil Young Jung, Hoon Ryu, Jae Hung Jung, Eunbi Lee, Joong Hwan Oh, Chun Sung Byun, Il Hwan Park
-
Korean J Crit Care Med. 2015;30(1):13-17. Published online February 28, 2015
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2015.30.1.13
-
Correction in: Acute Crit Care 2015;30(4):365
-
7,183
View
-
90
Download
-
1
Citations
-
 Abstract
PDF
- Background
Totally implantable access port (TIAP) provides reliable, long term vascular access with minimal risk of infection and allows patients normal physical activity. With wide use of ports, new complications have been encountered. We analyzed TIAP related complications and evaluated the outcomes of two different percutaneous routes of access to superior vena cava. Methods: All 172 patients who underwent port insertion with internal jugular approach (Group 1, n = 92) and subclavian approach (Group 2, n = 79) between August 2011 and May 2013 in a single center were analyzed, retrospectively. Medical records were analyzed to compare the outcomes and the occurrence of port related complications between two different percutaneous routes of access to superior vena cava. Results: Median follow-up for TIAP was 278 days (range, 1-1868). Twenty four complications were occurred (14.0%), including pneumothorax (n = 1, 0.6%), migration/malposition (n = 4, 2.3%), pinch-off syndrome (n = 4, 2.3%), malfunction (n = 2, 1.1%), infection (n = 8, 4.7%), and venous thrombosis (n = 5, 2.9%). The overall incidence was 8.7% and 20.3% in each group (p = 0.030). Mechanical complications except infectious and thrombotic complications were more often occurred in group 2 (p = 0.033). The mechanical complication free probability is significantly higher in group 1 (p = 0.040). Conclusions: We suggest that the jugular access should be chosen in patients who need long term catheterization because of high incidence of mechanical complication, such as pinch-off syndrome.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by  - Internal jugular vein versus subclavian vein as the percutaneous insertion site for totally implantable venous access devices: a meta-analysis of comparative studies
Shaoyong Wu, Jingxiu Huang, Zongming Jiang, Zhimei Huang, Handong Ouyang, Li Deng, Wenqian Lin, Jin Guo, Weian Zeng
BMC Cancer.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
|
