Acute and Critical Care

Review Article

Meta-analysis
The impact of ketamine on outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials: Yerkin Abdildin, Karina Tapinova, Assel Nemerenova, Dmitriy Viderman; Acute Crit Care. 2024;39(1):34-46. Published online February 28, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2023.00829

1,252 View
110 Download

Abstract PDF: Background
This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effects of ketamine in critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients.
Methods
We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library; the search was performed initially in January but was repeated in December of 2023. We focused on ICU patients of any age. We included studies that compared ketamine with other traditional agents used in the ICU. We synthesized evidence using RevMan v5.4 and presented the results as forest plots. We also used trial sequential analysis (TSA) software v. 0.9.5.10 Beta and presented results as TSA plots. For synthesizing results, we used a random-effects model and reported differences in outcomes of two groups in terms of mean difference (MD), standardized MD, and risk ratio with 95% confidence interval. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB tool for RCTs. Our outcomes were mortality, pain, opioid and midazolam requirements, delirium rates, and ICU length of stay.
Results
Twelve RCTs involving 805 ICU patients (ketamine group, n=398; control group, n=407) were included in the meta-analysis. The ketamine group was not superior to the control group in terms of mortality (in five studies with 318 patients), pain (two studies with 129 patients), mean and cumulative opioid consumption (six studies with 494 patients), midazolam consumption (six studies with 304 patients), and ICU length of stay (three studies with 270 patients). However, the model favored the ketamine group over the control group in delirium rate (four studies with 358 patients). This result is significant in terms of conventional boundaries (alpha=5%) but is not robust in sequential analysis. The applicability of the findings is limited by the small number of patients pooled for each outcome.
Conclusions
Our meta-analysis did not demonstrate differences between ketamine and control groups regarding any outcome except delirium rate, where the model favored the ketamine group over the control group. However, this result is not robust as sensitivity analysis and trial sequential analysis suggest that more RCTs should be conducted in the future.

Guideline

Pharmacology
2021 KSCCM clinical practice guidelines for pain, agitation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disturbance in the intensive care unit: Yijun Seo, Hak-Jae Lee, Eun Jin Ha, Tae Sun Ha; Acute Crit Care. 2022;37(1):1-25. Published online February 28, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2022.00094; Correction in: Acute Crit Care 2023;38(1):149

15,370 View
1,605 Download
11 Web of Science
22 Crossref

We revised and expanded the “2010 Guideline for the Use of Sedatives and Analgesics in the Adult Intensive Care Unit (ICU).” We revised the 2010 Guideline based mainly on the 2018 “Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption (PADIS) in Adult Patients in the ICU,” which was an updated 2013 pain, agitation, and delirium guideline with the inclusion of two additional topics (rehabilitation/mobility and sleep). Since it was not possible to hold face-to-face meetings of panels due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, all discussions took place via virtual conference platforms and e-mail with the participation of all panelists. All authors drafted the recommendations, and all panelists discussed and revised the recommendations several times. The quality of evidence for each recommendation was classified as high (level A), moderate (level B), or low/very low (level C), and all panelists voted on the quality level of each recommendation. The participating panelists had no conflicts of interest on related topics. The development of this guideline was independent of any industry funding. The Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility (rehabilitation/mobilization), and Sleep Disturbance panels issued 42 recommendations (level A, 6; level B, 18; and level C, 18). The 2021 clinical practice guideline provides up-to-date information on how to prevent and manage pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disturbance in adult ICU patients. We believe that these guidelines can provide an integrated method for clinicians to manage PADIS in adult ICU patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Potentially inappropriate medications with older people in intensive care and associated factors: a historic cohort study
Karina Sichieri, Danilo Donizetti Trevisan, Ricardo Luís Barbosa, Silvia Regina Secoli
Sao Paulo Medical Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Psychiatric Consults Associated With Longer Length of Stay in Trauma Patients—A Retrospective Study
Sanjay Balijepalli, Kathryn Mansuri, Cindy Gonzalez, Oveys Mansuri
Journal of Surgical Research.2024; 293: 46. CrossRef
Sleep in the intensive and intermediate care units: Exploring related factors of delirium, benzodiazepine use and mortality
Adrienne E. van der Hoeven, Denise Bijlenga, Ernst van der Hoeven, Mink S. Schinkelshoek, Floor W. Hiemstra, Laura Kervezee, David J. van Westerloo, Rolf Fronczek, Gert Jan Lammers
Intensive and Critical Care Nursing.2024; 81: 103603. CrossRef
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Indonesian version of the Critical-care Pain Observation Tool
Luthfi Fauzy Asriyanto, Nur Chayati
International Journal of Nursing Sciences.2024; 11(1): 113. CrossRef
Postoperative Psychoses in Patients with Brain Gliomas
O. S. Zaitsev, N. P. Ilyaev, O. A. Maksakova
Psikhiatriya.2024; 21(7): 65. CrossRef
Liberation from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients: Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines
Tae Sun Ha, Dong Kyu Oh, Hak-Jae Lee, Youjin Chang, In Seok Jeong, Yun Su Sim, Suk-Kyung Hong, Sunghoon Park, Gee Young Suh, So Young Park
Acute and Critical Care.2024; 39(1): 1. CrossRef
Prevalence and risk factors of delirium of older adults after cardiac surgery at the intensive care unit: A retrospective study
Jeong-Ok Ryu, Gwi-Ryung Son Hong
Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing.2024; 26(1): 113. CrossRef
Factors that influence critical care nurses’ management of sedation for ventilated patients in critical care: A qualitative study
Danielle Macpherson, Anastasia Hutchinson, Melissa J. Bloomer
Intensive and Critical Care Nursing.2024; 83: 103685. CrossRef
Content analysis of NOC outcomes related to mechanical ventilation in people with COVID-19
Erika Silva de Sá, Aline Batista Maurício, Larissa Giardini Bruni, Larissa Gabrielle Dias Vieira, Vinicius Batista Santos, Agueda Maria Ruiz Zimmer Cavalcante, Alba Lucia Bottura Leite de Barros, Viviane Martins da Silva
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Análise de conteúdo de resultados NOC relacionados à ventilação mecânica em pessoas com COVID-19
Erika Silva de Sá, Aline Batista Maurício, Larissa Giardini Bruni, Larissa Gabrielle Dias Vieira, Vinicius Batista Santos, Agueda Maria Ruiz Zimmer Cavalcante, Alba Lucia Bottura Leite de Barros, Viviane Martins da Silva
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
End‐of‐life care in the intensive care unit
M. Tanaka Gutiez, N. Efstathiou, R. Innes, V. Metaxa
Anaesthesia.2023; 78(5): 636. CrossRef
The Profile of Early Sedation Depth and Clinical Outcomes of Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Korea
Dong-gon Hyun, Jee Hwan Ahn, Ha-Yeong Gil, Chung Mo Nam, Choa Yun, Jae-Myeong Lee, Jae Hun Kim, Dong-Hyun Lee, Ki Hoon Kim, Dong Jung Kim, Sang-Min Lee, Ho-Geol Ryu, Suk-Kyung Hong, Jae-Bum Kim, Eun Young Choi, JongHyun Baek, Jeoungmin Kim, Eun Jin Kim, T
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The relationship between the PRE-DELIRIC score and the prognosis in COVID-19 ICU patients
Bilge Banu Taşdemir Mecit
Journal of Surgery and Medicine.2023; 7(5): 343. CrossRef
Systemic Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatories for Analgesia in Postoperative Critical Care Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials
Chen Hsiang Ma, Kimberly B. Tworek, Janice Y. Kung, Sebastian Kilcommons, Kathleen Wheeler, Arabesque Parker, Janek Senaratne, Erika Macintyre, Wendy Sligl, Constantine J. Karvellas, Fernando G. Zampieri, Demetrios Jim Kutsogiannis, John Basmaji, Kimberle
Critical Care Explorations.2023; 5(7): e0938. CrossRef
Pain Control and Sedation in Neuro Intensive Critical Unit
Soo-Hyun Park, Yerim Kim, Yeojin Kim, Jong Seok Bae, Ju-Hun Lee, Wookyung Kim, Hong-Ki Song
Journal of the Korean Neurological Association.2023; 41(3): 169. CrossRef
Preoperative Anxiety and Its Postoperative Associated Factors in Patients Receiving Post Anesthetic Recovery Care at Surgical Intensive Care Unit
Yul Ha Lee, Hye-Ja Park
Journal of Health Informatics and Statistics.2023; 48(3): 267. CrossRef
Diagnostic Value of the Bispectral Index to Assess Sleep Quality after Elective Surgery in Intensive Care Unit
Naricha Chirakalwasan, Pongpol Sirilaksanamanon, Thammasak Thawitsri, Somrat Charuluxananan
Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine.2023; 27(11): 795. CrossRef
Sedation of patients in intensive care units. Guidelines
V.I. Potievskaya, I.B. Zabolotskikh, I.E. Gridchik, A.I. Gritsan, A.A. Eremenko, I.A. Kozlov, A.L. Levit, V.A. Mazurok, I.V. Molchanov
Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya.2023; (5): 6. CrossRef
Sedation for Patients with Sepsis: Towards a Personalised Approach
José Miguel Marcos-Vidal, Rafael González, María Merino, Eva Higuera, Cristina García
Journal of Personalized Medicine.2023; 13(12): 1641. CrossRef
Performance, Knowledge, and Barrier Awareness of Medical Staff Regarding the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Critical Care Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Hyo-Geun Song, Duckhee Chae, Sung-Hee Yoo
Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2023; 35(4): 379. CrossRef
ICU-Induced Disability Persists With or Without COVID-19—This Is a Call for F to A Bundle Action*
Heidi Engel
Critical Care Medicine.2022; 50(11): 1665. CrossRef
Actigraphy-Based Assessment of Sleep Parameters in Intensive Care Unit Patients Receiving Respiratory Support Therapy
Jiyeon Kang, Yongbin Kwon
Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing.2022; 15(3): 115. CrossRef

Original Article

Neurology
The Effects of a Delirium Notification Program on the Clinical Outcomes of the Intensive Care Unit: A Preliminary Pilot Study: Jaesub Park, Seung-Taek Oh, Sunyoung Park, Won-Jung Choi, Cheung Soo Shin, Se Hee Na, Jae-Jin Kim, Jooyoung Oh, Jin Young Park; Acute Crit Care. 2018;33(1):23-33. Published online February 6, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2017.00584

9,183 View
185 Download
2 Web of Science
1 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Background
Delirium is common among intensive care unit (ICU) patients, so recent clinical guidelines recommended routine delirium monitoring in the ICU. But, its effect on the patient’s clinical outcome is still controversial. In particular, the effect of systems that inform the primary physician of the results of monitoring is largely unknown.
Methods
The delirium notification program using bedside signs and electronic chart notifications was applied to the pre-existing delirium monitoring protocol. Every patient was routinely evaluated for delirium, pain, and anxiety using validated tools. Clinical outcomes, including duration of delirium, ICU stay, and mortality were reviewed and compared for 3 months before and after the program implementation.
Results
There was no significant difference between the two periods of delirium, ICU stay, and mortality. However, anxiety, an important prognostic factor in the ICU survivor’s mental health, was significantly reduced and pain tended to decrease.
Conclusions
Increasing the physician’s awareness of the patient’s mental state by using a notification program could reduce the anxiety of ICU patients even though it may not reduce delirium. The results suggested that the method of delivering the results of monitoring was also an important factor in the success of the delirium monitoring program.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Adaptation and Validation of a Chart‐Based Delirium Detection Tool for the ICU (CHART‐DEL‐ICU)
Karla D. Krewulak, Carmen Hiploylee, E. W. Ely, Henry T. Stelfox, Sharon K. Inouye, Kirsten M. Fiest
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.2021; 69(4): 1027. CrossRef

Review

Pharmacology
Assessment and Treatment of Pain in Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients: Jun Mo Park, Ji Hyun Kim; Korean J Crit Care Med. 2014;29(3):147-159. Published online August 31, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2014.29.3.147

17,954 View
690 Download
3 Crossref

Abstract PDF

In most cases, patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) have suffered from severe trauma, undergone major surgery or been treated for a serious medical illness. Although they often experience more intense pain than general ward patients, they are frequently unable to communicate their experiences to health care providers, thus preventing accurate assessment and treatment of their pain. If appropriate measures are not taken to treat pain in critically ill patients, stress response or sympathetic overstimulation can lead to complications. The short-term consequences of untreated pain include higher energy expenditure and immunomodulation. Longer-term, untreated pain increases the risk of post-traumatic stress disorder. Because pain is quite subjective, the accurate assessment of pain is very difficult in the patients with impaired communication ability. The current most valid and reliable behavioral pain scales used to assess pain in adult ICU patients are the Behavioral Pain Scale and the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool. Once pain has been accurately assessed using these methods, various pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies should be performed by the multidisciplinary care team. Accurate assessment and proper treatment of pain in adult ICU patients will improve patients outcome, which reduces the stress response and decreases the risk of post-traumatic stress disorder.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Nurses’ knowledge, practice, and associated factors of pain assessment in critically ill adult patients at public hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Temesgen Ayenew, Berhanu Melaku, Mihretie Gedfew, Haile Amha, Keralem Anteneh Bishaw
International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences.2021; 15: 100361. CrossRef
Impact of Pain Management Algorithm on Pain Intensity of Patients with Loss of Consciousness Hospitalized in Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Trial
Zahra Dehghani, Asadollah Keikhaei, Fariba Yaghoubinia, Aliakbar Keykha, Masoom Khoshfetrat
Medical - Surgical Nursing Journal.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Ignorance may be Bliss (for Intensivists), but not for ICU Patients!
Atul P. Kulkarni, Sumitra G Bakshi
Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine.2019; 23(4): 161. CrossRef

Randomized Controlled Trial

The Analgesic Effect of Remifentanil on Propofol Injection Pain: Younghoon Jeon, Min Je Choi, Choon Hak Lim; Korean J Crit Care Med. 2011;26(4):212-216.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2011.26.4.212

2,304 View
18 Download

Abstract PDF: BACKGROUND
Pain is a common side-effect of propofol injection. A remifentanil pretreatment has been reported to decrease the incidence and intensity of pain during a propofol injection and has been suggested to act through a central or peripheral effect. This trial was designed to explore the action site of remifentanil on reducing propofol injection pain, using the venous occlusion technique and a time interval between the applications of remifentanil and propofol.
METHODS
This randomized, double-blind study was designed to explore the action site of remifentanil on reducing propofol injection pain in 200 patients scheduled for elective surgery. The peripheral properties were examined using the venous occlusion technique for 30 s while a 1 min time interval between remifentanil and propofol injections was allowed for the central effect. Before the propofol injection, group A was pretreated with remifentanil (0.5 microg/ kg) with a venous occlusion, group B with remifentanil and a 1 min interval, and group C with remifentanil with a venous occlusion and a 1 min interval. Pain severity was assessed using a four-point scale.
RESULTS
40 patients (80%) complained of pain in the placebo group compared with 35 (70%) in group A, 20 (40%) in group B (p < 0.05) and 17 (34%) in group C (p < 0.05). The incidence and severity of propofol injection pain were lower in groups B and C than in group A (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between groups B and C.
CONCLUSIONS
The remifentanil mediated analgesic effect occurs mainly through the central effect.

Original Article

The Effectiveness of Foot -Reflexo- Massage on the Postoperative Pain of Gastrectomy Patients: Houng Hwa Han, Young Ju Lee, Yun Jeong Chae, Jong Sin Eun, Hyun Ho Lee, Jee Won Park; Korean J Crit Care Med. 2005;20(2):136-143.

1,565 View
16 Download

Abstract PDF: BACKGROUND
The objects of this study were to determine the effects of foot reflexo massage on the postoperative pain of the subtotal gastrectomy patients according to quasi-experimental research design, and to provide demonstrative data for using the foot reflexo massage as an intervention for pain nursing. METHODS: The foot reflexo massages were performed on 34 subtotal gastrectomy patients after informed consent was obtained. They were divided into two groups, i.e. control group (n=17) and experimental group (n=17). After 6 hours and 12 hours from the subtotal gastrectomy, the massage was carried out on each foot for 10 minutes twice. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was employed as the measurement tools of pain, and the degree of postoperative pain was measured through frequency of prn (pro re nata) analgesia in chart review. RESULTS: The experimental group with foot reflexo massage 6 hours after the operation have significantly less score of postoperative pain than the control group (5.76+/-0.83, 4.35+/-1.0, p=.000). The experimental group with foot reflexo massage 12 hours after the operation have significantly less score of postoperative pain than the control group (5.12+/-0.53, 3.00+/-1.17, p=.000). The experimental group with foot reflexo massage have significantly less frequency of prn analgesics than the control group from six hours to twelve hours after the operation (p=.004). CONCLUSIONS: It is considered foot reflexo massage is effective for reducing postoperative pain of subtotal gastrectomy patients, as well as useful for an immediate nursing intervention.

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search