Miguel Ángel Martínez-Camacho, Robert Alexander Jones-Baro, Alberto Gómez-González, Dalia Sahian Lugo-García, Pía Carolina Gallardo Astorga, Andrea Melo-Villalobos, Bárbara Kassandra Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Ángel Augusto Pérez-Calatayud
Acute Crit Care. 2024;39(1):47-60. Published online February 2, 2024
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical staff learned how to manage patients enduring extended stays in an intensive care unit (ICU). COVID-19 patients requiring critical care in an ICU face a high risk of experiencing prolonged intensive care (PIC). The use of invasive mechanical ventilation in individuals with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome can cause numerous complications that influence both short-term and long-term morbidity and mortality. Those risks underscore the importance of proactively addressing functional complications. Mitigating secondary complications unrelated to the primary pathology of admission is imperative in minimizing the risk of PIC. Therefore, incorporating strategies to do that into daily ICU practice for both COVID-19 patients and those critically ill from other conditions is significantly important.
Background The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 outbreak has been identified as a pandemic and global health emergency. It presents as a severe acute respiratory disease. The rapid dissemination of the disease created challenges for healthcare systems and forced healthcare workers (HCWs) to deal with many clinical and nonclinical stresses. The aim of our research is to describe work conditions, symptoms experienced by HCWs, worries about contagion, and generalized anxiety symptoms and compare those findings across regions in Spain. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey. Critical care units throughout Spain were included. The sample comprised HCWs working in intensive care units from March to May 2020. We assessed work variables, physical symptoms, worries about contagion, and anxiety (generalized anxiety disorder-7 questionnaire). Results: The final sample comprised 448 surveys. Among the respondents, 86.9% (n=389) were nursing professionals, and 84.8% (n=380) were women. All participants cared for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients during the study period. Workload during the pandemic in Madrid was judged to be higher than in other regions (P<0.01). The availability of personal protective equipment was found to be higher in Cataluña. The most frequently experienced symptom was headaches (78.1%). Worries about self-infection and the possibility of infecting others received mean scores of 3.11 and 3.75, respectively. Mean scores for generalized anxiety levels were 11.02, with 58.7% of the professionals presenting with generalized anxiety syndrome during the assessment. Conclusions: In this study, we found high levels of anxiety among HCWs caring directly for COVID-19 patients, which could produce long-term psychological alterations that still need to be assessed.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
From Anxiety to Hardiness: The Role of Self-Efficacy in Spanish CCU Nurses in the COVID-19 Pandemic Fernanda Gil-Almagro, Fernando José García-Hedrera, Francisco Javier Carmona-Monge, Cecilia Peñacoba-Puente Medicina.2024; 60(2): 215. CrossRef
Cognitive appraisals and coping strategies of registered nurses in the emergency department combating COVID‐19: A scoping review Chia‐Hung Lin, Shu‐Fen Siao, You‐Jie Lin, Pin‐Hsien Hsin, Mack Shelley, Yen‐Han Lee Journal of Nursing Scholarship.2023; 55(1): 79. CrossRef
The impact of pandemics on healthcare providers' workloads: A scoping review Gemma Doleman, Annemarie De Leo, Dianne Bloxsome Journal of Advanced Nursing.2023; 79(12): 4434. CrossRef
Critical care medicine training in the age of COVID-19 Walter Mickey Journal of Osteopathic Medicine.2023; 123(9): 427. CrossRef
Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Spanish healthcare workers: a systematic review of prevalence and wave-based patterns Irene Jaén, Carolina Ausín, Diana Castilla Current Psychology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on intensive care unit workers: a nationwide survey Sangeeta Mehta, Christopher Yarnell, Sumesh Shah, Peter Dodek, Jeanna Parsons-Leigh, Robert Maunder, Jessica Kayitesi, Catherine Eta-Ndu, Fran Priestap, Danielle LeBlanc, Jennifer Chen, Kimia Honarmand Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie.2022; 69(4): 472. CrossRef
Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly contagious disease that causes respiratory failure. Tracheostomy is an essential procedure in critically ill COVID-19 patients; however, it is an aerosol-generating technique and thus carries the risk of infection transmission. We report our experience with percutaneous tracheostomy and its safety in a real medical setting.
Methods During the COVID-19 outbreak, 13 critically ill patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at Daegu Catholic University Medical Center between February 24 and April 30, 2020. Seven of these patients underwent percutaneous tracheostomy using Ciaglia Blue Rhino. The medical environment, percutaneous tracheostomy method, and COVID-19 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results were retrospectively reviewed. After treatment, the COVID-19 infection status of healthcare personnel was investigated by RT-PCR.
Results The ICU contained negative pressure cohort areas and isolation rooms, and healthcare personnel wore a powered air-purifying respirator system. We performed seven cases of percutaneous tracheostomy in the same way as in patients without COVID-19. Five patients (71.4%) tested positive for COVID-19 by RT-PCR at the time of tracheostomy. The median cycle threshold value for the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase was 30.60 (interquartile range [IQR], 25.50–36.56) in the upper respiratory tract and 35.04 (IQR, 28.40–36.74) in the lower respiratory tract. All healthcare personnel tested negative for COVID-19 by RT-PCR.
Conclusions Percutaneous tracheostomy was performed with conventional methods in the negative pressure cohort area. It was safe to perform percutaneous tracheostomy in an environment of COVID-19 infection.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Sedation and Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Tracheostomy in COVID-19, a Multi-Center Registry Christopher M. Kapp, Ardian Latifi, David Feller-Kopman, Joshua H. Atkins, Esther Ben Or, David Dibardino, Andrew R. Haas, Jeffrey Thiboutot, Christoph T. Hutchinson Journal of Intensive Care Medicine.2022; 37(2): 240. CrossRef
Percutaneous Tracheostomy in Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19 Samuel E. Cohen, Angelena R. Lopez, Philip K. Ng, Oren A. Friedman, George E. Chaux Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology.2022; 29(2): 125. CrossRef
Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) You Shang, Jianfeng Wu, Jinglun Liu, Yun Long, Jianfeng Xie, Dong Zhang, Bo Hu, Yuan Zong, Xuelian Liao, Xiuling Shang, Renyu Ding, Kai Kang, Jiao Liu, Aijun Pan, Yonghao Xu, Changsong Wang, Qianghong Xu, Xijing Zhang, Jicheng Zhang, Ling Liu, Jiancheng Z Journal of Intensive Medicine.2022; 2(4): 199. CrossRef
Commentary: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) tracheostomies—The “how” but not the “why” or “when” Benjamin Wei, Peter Abraham JTCVS Techniques.2021; 6: 190. CrossRef
Association of Tracheostomy With Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Among Health Care Professionals Phillip Staibano, Marc Levin, Tobial McHugh, Michael Gupta, Doron D. Sommer JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery.2021; 147(7): 646. CrossRef
Tracheostomy in COVID Times Yatin Mehta, Gaurav Kochar Journal of Cardiac Critical Care TSS.2021; 5(02): 082. CrossRef